Erratum to: Dynamic chromosome movements during meiosis: a way to eliminate unwanted connections? [Trends in Cell Biology (2009) 19, 716-724] (DOI:10.1016/j.tcb.2009.09.007);Dynamic chromosome movements during meiosis: a way to eliminate unwanted connections?

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 716-724

  Koszul, Romain ^a   Kleckner, Nancy ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYTOSKELETON; DNA METABOLISM; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HUMAN; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PACHYTENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHASE; REVIEW; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 70449900937     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.12.008     Document Type: Erratum

References (86)

1. Parvinen M., and Soderstrom K.O. Chromosome rotation and formation of synapsis. Nature 260 (1976) 534-535
2. Chikashige Y., et al. Another way to move chromosomes. Chromosoma 116 (2007) 497-505
3. Bozza C.G., and Pawlowski W.P. The cytogenetics of homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis in plants. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 120 (2008) 313-319
4. Bhalla N., and Dernburg A.F. Prelude to a division. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 24 (2008) 397-424
5. Gerton J.L., and Hawley R.S. Homologous chromosome interactions in meiosis: diversity amidst conservation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6 (2005) 477-487
6. Tesse S., et al. Localization and roles of Ski8p protein in Sordaria meiosis and delineation of three mechanistically distinct steps of meiotic homolog juxtaposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 12865-12870
7. Hunter N., and Kleckner N. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106 (2001) 59-70
8. Zickler D. From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation. Chromosoma 115 (2006) 158-174
9. Kleckner N. Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma 115 (2006) 175-194
10. Borner G.V. Balancing the checks: surveillance of chromosomal exchange during meiosis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34 (2006) 554-556
11. Blat Y., et al. Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell 111 (2002) 791-802
12. Padmore R., et al. Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell 66 (1991) 1239-1256
13. Vazquez J., et al. The dynamics of homologous chromosome pairing during male Drosophila meiosis. Curr. Biol. 12 (2002) 1473-1483
14. Kleckner N., and Weiner B.M. Potential advantages of unstable interactions for pairing of chromosomes in meiotic, somatic, and premeiotic cells. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 58 (1993) 553-565
15. Scherthan H. A bouquet makes ends meet. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2 (2001) 621-627
16. Harper L., et al. A bouquet of chromosomes. J. Cell Sci. 117 (2004) 4025-4032
17. Zickler D., and Kleckner N. The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32 (1998) 619-697
18. Bass H.W. Telomere dynamics unique to meiotic prophase: formation and significance of the bouquet. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 60 (2003) 2319-2324
19. Chikashige Y., et al. Telomere-led premeiotic chromosome movement in fission yeast. Science 264 (1994) 270-273
20. Ding D.Q., et al. Oscillatory nuclear movement in fission yeast meiotic prophase is driven by astral microtubules, as revealed by continuous observation of chromosomes and microtubules in living cells. J. Cell Sci. 111 (1998) 701-712
21. Scherthan H. Telomere attachment and clustering during meiosis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64 (2007) 117-124
22. Koszul R., et al. Meiotic chromosomes move by linkage to dynamic actin cables with transduction of force through the nuclear envelope. Cell 133 (2008) 1188-1201
23. Conrad M.N., et al. Rapid telomere movement in meiotic prophase is promoted by NDJ1, MPS3, and CSM4 and is modulated by recombination. Cell 133 (2008) 1175-1187
24. Wanat J.J., et al. Csm4, in collaboration with Ndj1, mediates telomere-led chromosome dynamics and recombination during yeast meiosis. PLoS Genet. 4 (2008) e1000188
25. Kosaka H., et al. Csm4-dependent telomere movement on nuclear envelope promotes meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet. 4 (2008) e1000196
26. Trelles-Sticken E., et al. Meiotic telomere clustering requires actin for its formation and cohesin for its resolution. J. Cell Biol. 170 (2005) 213-223
27. Storlazzi A., et al. Meiotic double-strand breaks at the interface of chromosome movement, chromosome remodeling, and reductional division. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 2675-2687
28. Phillips C.M., and Dernburg A.F. A family of zinc-finger proteins is required for chromosome-specific pairing and synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans. Dev. Cell 11 (2006) 817-829
29. Stewart M.N., and Dawson D.S. Changing partners: moving from non-homologous to homologous centromere pairing in meiosis. Trends. Genet. 24 (2008) 564-573
30. Yamamoto A., and Hiraoka Y. Cytoplasmic dynein in fungi: insights from nuclear migration. J. Cell Sci. 116 (2003) 4501-4512
31. Vogel S.K., et al. Self-organization of dynein motors generates meiotic nuclear oscillations. PLoS Biol. 7 (2009) e1000087
32. Boldogh I.R., and Pon L.A. Mitochondria on the move. Trends Cell Biol. 17 (2007) 502-510
33. Penkner A., et al. The nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1 is required for homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. Dev. Cell 12 (2007) 873-885
34. Starr D.A., and Fischer J.A. KASH 'n Karry: the KASH domain family of cargo-specific cytoskeletal adaptor proteins. Bioessays 27 (2005) 1136-1146
35. Tzur Y.B., et al. SUN-domain proteins: 'Velcro' that links the nucleoskeleton to the cytoskeleton. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7 (2006) 782-788
36. Wilhelmsen K., et al. KASH-domain proteins in nuclear migration, anchorage and other processes. J. Cell Sci. 119 (2006) 5021-5029
37. Starr D.A. A nuclear-envelope bridge positions nuclei and moves chromosomes. J. Cell Sci. 122 (2009) 577-586
38. Malone C.J., et al. UNC-84 localizes to the nuclear envelope and is required for nuclear migration and anchoring during C. elegans development. Development 126 (1999) 3171-3181
39. Starr D.A., and Han M. Role of ANC-1 in tethering nuclei to the actin cytoskeleton. Science 298 (2002) 406-409
40. Conrad M.N., et al. MPS3 mediates meiotic bouquet formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 8863-8868
41. Ding X., et al. SUN1 is required for telomere attachment to nuclear envelope and gametogenesis in mice. Dev. Cell 12 (2007) 863-872
42. Schmitt J., et al. Transmembrane protein Sun2 is involved in tethering mammalian meiotic telomeres to the nuclear envelope. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 7426-7431
43. Chikashige Y., et al. Meiotic proteins bqt1 and bqt2 tether telomeres to form the bouquet arrangement of chromosomes. Cell 125 (2006) 59-69
44. Tang X., et al. Bqt2p is essential for initiating telomere clustering upon pheromone sensing in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 173 (2006) 845-851
45. Miki F., et al. Two-hybrid search for proteins that interact with Sad1 and Kms1, two membrane-bound components of the spindle pole body in fission yeast. Mol. Genet. Genomics 270 (2004) 449-461
46. Miki F., et al. The 14-kDa dynein light chain-family protein Dlc1 is required for regular oscillatory nuclear movement and efficient recombination during meiotic prophase in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 13 (2002) 930-946
47. Bupp J.M., et al. Telomere anchoring at the nuclear periphery requires the budding yeast Sad1-UNC-84 domain protein Mps3. J. Cell Biol. 179 (2007) 845-854
48. Jaspersen S.L., et al. Mps3p is a novel component of the yeast spindle pole body that interacts with the yeast centrin homologue Cdc31p. J. Cell Biol. 159 (2002) 945-956
49. Yamashita A., and Yamamoto M. Fission yeast Num1p is a cortical factor anchoring dynein and is essential for the horse-tail nuclear movement during meiotic prophase. Genetics 173 (2006) 1187-1196
50. Ding D.Q., et al. Dynamics of homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase in fission yeast. Dev. Cell 6 (2004) 329-341
51. Trelles-Sticken E., et al. Meiotic telomere protein Ndj1p is required for meiosis-specific telomere distribution, bouquet formation and efficient homologue pairing. J. Cell Biol. 151 (2000) 95-106
52. Goldman A.S., and Lichten M. Restriction of ectopic recombination by interhomolog interactions during Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 (2000) 9537-9542
53. Schlecht H.B., et al. Compartmentalization of the yeast meiotic nucleus revealed by analysis of ectopic recombination. Genetics 168 (2004) 1189-1203
54. Wells J.L., et al. Homologous chromosome pairing in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 23 (2006) 977-989
55. von Wettstein D., et al. The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Ann. Rev. Genet. 18 (1984) 331-413
56. Golubovskaya I.N., et al. The pam1 gene is required for meiotic bouquet formation and efficient homologous synapsis in maize (Zea mays L.). Genetics 162 (2002) 1979-1993
57. Niwa O., et al. Telomere-led bouquet formation facilitates homologous chromosome pairing and restricts ectopic interaction in fission yeast meiosis. EMBO J 19 (2000) 3831-3840
58. Davis L., and Smith G.R. The meiotic bouquet promotes homolog interactions and restricts ectopic recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 174 (2006) 167-177
59. Taddei A., et al. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 441 (2006) 774-778
60. Cabal G.G., et al. SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 441 (2006) 770-773
61. Schmid M., et al. Nup-PI: the nucleopore-promoter interaction of genes in yeast. Mol. Cell 21 (2006) 379-391
62. Nagai S., et al. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 322 (2008) 597-602
63. Therizols P., et al. Telomere tethering at the nuclear periphery is essential for efficient DNA double strand break repair in subtelomeric region. J. Cell Biol. 172 (2006) 189-199
64. Oza P., et al. Mechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery. Genes Dev. 23 (2009) 912-927
65. Nicklas R.B. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275 (1997) 632-637
66. Poirier M.G., and Marko J.F. Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 55 (2003) 75-141
67. Dernburg A.F., et al. Direct evidence of a role for heterochromatin in meiotic chromosome segregation. Cell 86 (1996) 135-146
68. Itano N., et al. Cell spreading controls endoplasmic and nuclear calcium: a physical gene regulation pathway from the cell surface to the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 5181-5186
69. Dahl K.N., et al. Power-law rheology of isolated nuclei with deformation mapping of nuclear substructures. Biophys. J. 89 (2005) 2855-2864
70. Pajerowski J.D., et al. Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 15619-15624
71. King M.C., et al. A network of nuclear envelope membrane proteins linking centromeres to microtubules. Cell 134 (2008) 427-438
72. Schober H., et al. Yeast telomerase and the SUN domain protein Mps3 anchor telomeres and repress subtelomeric recombination. Genes Dev. 23 (2009) 928-938
73. Kalocsay M., et al. Chromosome-wide Rad51 spreading and SUMO-H2A.Z-dependent chromosome fixation in response to a persistent DNA double-strand break. Mol. Cell 33 (2009) 335-343
74. Chuang C.H., et al. Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 825-831
75. Ye J., et al. Nuclear myosin I acts in concert with polymeric actin to drive RNA polymerase I transcription. Genes Dev. 22 (2008) 322-330
76. Dundr M., et al. Actin-dependent intranuclear repositioning of an active gene locus in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 179 (2007) 1095-1103
77. McDonald D., et al. Nucleoplasmic beta-actin exists in a dynamic equilibrium between low-mobility polymeric species and rapidly diffusing populations. J. Cell Biol. 172 (2006) 541-552
78. Gieni R.S., and Hendzel M.J. Actin dynamics and functions in the interphase nucleus: moving toward an understanding of nuclear polymeric actin. Biochem. Cell Biol. 87 (2009) 283-306
79. Gruenbaum Y., et al. The nuclear lamina comes of age. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6 (2005) 21-31
80. Wang N., et al. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10 (2009) 75-82
81. Cohen T.V., and Stewart C.L. Fraying at the edge mouse models of diseases resulting from defects at the nuclear periphery. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 84 (2008) 351-384
82. Jaalouk D.E., and Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10 (2009) 63-73
83. Janmey P.A., and McCulloch C.A. Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9 (2007) 1-34
84. van Heemst D., et al. Spo76p is a conserved chromosome morphogenesis protein that links the mitotic and meiotic programs. Cell 98 (1999) 261-271
85. Kezer J., et al. The meiotic structure and behavior of the strongly heteromorphic X/Y sex chromosomes of neotropical plethodontid salamanders of the genus Oedipina. Chromosoma 98 (1989) 433-442
86. Rasmussen S.W. The meiotic prophase in Bombyx mori females analyzed by three dimensional reconstructions of synaptonemal complexes. Chromosoma 54 (1976) 245-293