Changing partners: moving from non-homologous to homologous centromere pairing in meiosis

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 564-573

  Stewart, Mara N ^a   Dawson, Dean S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHESIN;

CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; GENE CLUSTER; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHASE; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; WHEAT; YEAST;

ANIMALS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; HUMANS; MEIOSIS; MODELS, GENETIC; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

MUS; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 54849408145     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Bennett M.D. Centromere arrangements in Triticum aestivum and their relationship to synapsis. Heredity 43 (1979) 157
2. Brinkley B.R., et al. Arrangements of kinetochores in mouse cells during meiosis and spermiogenesis. Chromosoma 94 (1986) 309-317
3. Church K., and Moens P.B. Centromere behavior during interphase and meiotic prophase in Allium fistulosum from 3-D, E.M. reconstruction. Chromosoma 56 (1976) 249-263
4. Kleckner N. Meiosis: how could it work?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93 (1996) 8167-8174
5. Yunis J.J., and Yasmineh W.G. Model for mammalian constitutive heterocromatin. In: DuPraw F.J. (Ed). Advances in Cell and Molecular Biology (1972), Academic Press 1-46
6. Prieto P., et al. Chromosomes associate premeiotically and in xylem vessel cells via their telomeres and centromeres in diploid rice (Oryza sativa). Chromosoma 112 (2004) 300-307
7. Dernburg A.F., et al. Direct evidence of a role for heterochromatin in meiotic chromosome segregation. Cell 86 (1996) 135-146
8. Ding D.Q., et al. Dynamics of homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase in fission yeast. Dev. Cell 6 (2004) 329-341
9. Kemp B., et al. A role for centromere pairing in meiotic chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 1946-1951
10. Tsubouchi T., and Roeder G.S. A synaptonemal complex protein promotes homology-independent centromere coupling. Science 308 (2005) 870-873
11. Moore G. Meiosis in allopolyploids-the importance of 'Teflon' chromosomes. Trends Genet. 18 (2002) 456-463
12. Naranjo T., and Corredor E. Nuclear architecture and chromosome dynamics in the search of the pairing partner in meiosis in plants. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 120 (2008) 320-330
13. Maestra B., et al. Chromosome arrangement and behaviour of two rye homologous telosomes at the onset of meiosis in disomic wheat-5RL addition lines with and without the Ph1 locus. Chromosome Res. 10 (2002) 655-667
14. Martinez-Perez E., et al. Homologous chromosome pairing in wheat. J. Cell Sci. 112 (1999) 1761-1769
15. Martinez-Perez E., et al. Polyploidy induces centromere association. J. Cell Biol. 148 (2000) 233-238
16. Jasencakova Z., et al. Chromatin organization and its relation to replication and histone acetylation during the cell cycle in barley. Chromosoma 110 (2001) 83-92
17. Aragon-Alcaide L., et al. Association of homologous chromosomes during floral development. Curr. Biol. 7 (1997) 905-908
18. Martinez-Perez E., et al. The Ph1 locus is needed to ensure specific somatic and meiotic centromere association. Nature 411 (2001) 204-207
19. Martinez-Perez E., et al. Chromosomes form into seven groups in hexaploid and tetraploid wheat as a prelude to meiosis. Plant J. 36 (2003) 21-29
20. Prieto P., et al. Homologue recognition during meiosis is associated with a change in chromatin conformation. Nat. Cell Biol. 6 (2004) 906-908
21. Corredor E., et al. Terminal regions of wheat chromosomes select their pairing partners in meiosis. Genetics 177 (2007) 699-706
22. Clarke L., and Carbon J. Genomic substitutions of centromeres in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 305 (1983) 23-28
23. Loidl J., et al. Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast. J. Cell Biol. 125 (1994) 1191-1200
24. Weiner B.M., and Kleckner N. Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast. Cell 77 (1994) 977-991
25. Moens P.B., and Church K. Centromere sizes, positions, and movements in the interphase nucleus. Chromosoma 61 (1977) 41-48
26. Al-Kaff N., et al. Detailed dissection of the chromosomal region containing the Ph1 locus in wheat Triticum aestivum: with deletion mutants and expression profiling. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 101 (2008) 863-872
27. Griffiths S., et al. Molecular characterization of Ph1 as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat. Nature 439 (2006) 749-752
28. Sym M., et al. ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 72 (1993) 365-378
29. Henderson K.A., and Keeney S. Tying synaptonemal complex initiation to the formation and programmed repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 4519-4524
30. Cheng C.H., et al. SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 20 (2006) 2067-2081
31. Goldstein L.S. Kinetochore structure and its role in chromosome orientation during the first meiotic division in male D. melanogaster. Cell 25 (1981) 591-602
32. Rieder C.L., and Salmon E.D. The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 8 (1998) 310-318
33. Moore L.L., et al. HCP-4/CENP-C promotes the prophase timing of centromere resolution by enabling the centromere association of HCP-6 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 2583-2592
34. Bernard P., et al. Fission yeast Bub1 is essential in setting up the meiotic pattern of chromosome segregation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3 (2001) 522-526
35. Kiburz B.M., et al. Shugoshin promotes sister kinetochore biorientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 19 (2008) 1199-1209
36. Maure J.F., et al. Mps1 kinase promotes sister-kinetochore bi-orientation by a tension-dependent mechanism. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 2175-2182
37. Hauf S., et al. Aurora controls sister kinetochore mono-orientation and homolog bi-orientation in meiosis-I. EMBO J. 26 (2007) 4475-4486
38. Monje-Casas F., et al. Kinetochore orientation during meiosis is controlled by Aurora B and the monopolin complex. Cell 128 (2007) 477-490
39. Petronczki M., et al. Monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores at meiosis I requires casein kinase 1. Cell 126 (2006) 1049-1064
40. Yokobayashi S., et al. Cohesins determine the attachment manner of kinetochores to spindle microtubules at meiosis I in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (2003) 3965-3973
41. Toth A., et al. Functional genomics identifies monopolin: a kinetochore protein required for segregation of homologs during meiosis i. Cell 103 (2000) 1155-1168
42. Yokobayashi S., and Watanabe Y. The kinetochore protein Moa1 enables cohesion-mediated monopolar attachment at meiosis I. Cell 123 (2005) 803-817
43. McCleland M.L., et al. The highly conserved Ndc80 complex is required for kinetochore assembly, chromosome congression, and spindle checkpoint activity. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 101-114
44. Zickler D. From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation. Chromosoma 115 (2006) 158-174
45. Conrad M.N., et al. Rapid telomere movement in meiotic prophase is promoted by NDJ1, MPS3 and CSM4 and is modulated by recombination. Cell 133 (2008) 1175-1187
46. Koszul R., et al. Meiotic chromosomes move by linkage to dynamic actin cables with transduction of force through the nuclear envelope. Cell 133 (2008) 1188-1201
47. Parvinen M., and Soderstrom K.O. Chromosome rotation and formation of synapsis. Nature 260 (1976) 534-535
48. Bass H.W., et al. The desynaptic (dy) and desynaptic1 (dsy1) mutations in maize (Zea mays L) cause distinct telomere-misplacement phenotypes during meiotic prophase. J. Exp. Bot. 54 (2003) 39-46
49. Chikashige Y., et al. Meiotic proteins bqt1 and bqt2 tether telomeres to form the bouquet arrangement of chromosomes. Cell 125 (2006) 59-69
50. Conrad M.N., et al. Ndj1p, a meiotic telomere protein required for normal chromosome synapsis and segregation in yeast. Science 276 (1997) 1252-1255
51. Jin Y., et al. Fission yeast mutants affecting telomere clustering and meiosis-specific spindle pole body integrity. Genetics 160 (2002) 861-876
52. Nimmo E.R., et al. Defective meiosis in telomere-silencing mutants of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature 392 (1998) 825-828
53. Koehler K.E., et al. Recombination and nondisjunction in humans and flies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5 Spec No (1996) 1495-1504
54. Rockmill B., et al. Centromere-proximal crossovers are associated with precocious separation of sister chromatids during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 174 (2006) 1745-1754
55. Beadle G.W. A possible influence of the spindle fibre on crossing-over in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 18 (1932) 160-165
56. Lambie E.J., and Roeder G.S. Repression of meiotic crossing over by a centromere (CEN3) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 114 (1986) 769-789
57. Watanabe Y. Shugoshin: guardian spirit at the centromere. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17 (2005) 590-595
58. Karpen G.H., et al. Centric heterochromatin and the efficiency of achiasmate disjunction in Drosophila female meiosis. Science 273 (1996) 118-122
59. Bridges C.B. Non-disjunction as proof of the chromosome theory of heredity. Genetics 1 (1916) 1-52
60. Xiang Y., and Hawley R.S. The mechanism of secondary nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics 174 (2006) 67-78
61. Nicklas R.B. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275 (1997) 632-637
62. Gilliland W.D., et al. The multiple roles of mps1 in Drosophila female meiosis. PLoS Genet. 3 (2007) e113
63. Hawley R.S., and Theurkauf W.E. Requiem for distributive segregation: achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females. Trends Genet. 9 (1993) 310-317
64. Cheslock P.S., et al. The roles of MAD1, MAD2 and MAD3 in meiotic progression and the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes. Nat. Genet. 37 (2005) 756-760
65. Gilliland W.D., et al. The meiotic defects of mutants in the Drosophila mps1 gene reveal a critical role of Mps1 in the segregation of achiasmate homologs. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) 672-677
66. Östergren G. The mechanism of co-orientation in bivalents and multivalents. Hereditas 37 (1951) 85-156
67. LeMaire-Adkins R., et al. Lack of checkpoint control at the metaphase/anaphase transition: a mechanism of meiotic nondisjunction in mammalian females. J. Cell Biol. 139 (1997) 1611-1619
68. Lacefield S., and Murray A.W. The spindle checkpoint rescues the meiotic segregation of chromosomes whose crossovers are far from the centromere. Nat. Genet. 39 (2007) 1273-1277
69. Kouznetsova A., et al. Bi-orientation of achiasmatic chromosomes in meiosis I oocytes contributes to aneuploidy in mice. Nat. Genet. 39 (2007) 966-968
70. Hassold T., and Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2 (2001) 280-291
71. Xu H., et al. A new role for the mitotic RAD21/SCC1 cohesin in meiotic chromosome cohesion and segregation in the mouse. EMBO Rep. 5 (2004) 378-384
72. Marston A.L., and Amon A. Meiosis: cell-cycle controls shuffle and deal. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5 (2004) 983-997
73. Padmore R., et al. Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell 66 (1991) 1239-1256