Performance and cost analysis of service-oriented enterprise architectures

Global Implications of Modern Enterprise Information Systems: Technologies and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 49-73

  Jonkers, Henk ^a   Iacob, Maria Eugenia ^b  

^a BiZZdesign ^*  (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449626589     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-146-9.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Alsaadi, A. (2004, January). A performance analysis approach based on the UML class diagram. In Proc 4th International Workshop on Software and Performance: ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 29(1).
2. Andrews, T., Curbera, F., Dholakia, H., Goland, Y., Klein, J., Leymann, F., Liu, K., Roller, D., Smith, D., & Thatte, S. (ed.), Trickovic, I., Weerawarana, S. (2002). Business Process Execution Language for Web Services version 1.1.
3. Balsamo, S., Simeoni, M. (2001a). Deriving Performance Models from Software Architecture Specifications. Proceedings of the 15th European Simulation Multiconference (ESM2001), SCS - Society for Computer Simulation.
4. Balsamo, S., Simeoni, M. (2001b). On Transforming UML models into performance models, Technical Report Saladin Project R-SAL-51, WTUML: Workshop on Transformations in UML, ETAPS 2001 Satellite Event Genova, Italy, April 7th.
5. Bernardi, S., Donatelli, S., & Merseguer, J. (2002). From UML sequence diagrams and statecharts to analysable Petri net models. In Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Software and Performance, Rome, Italy, 35 - 45.
6. BiZZdesign (2007). http://www.bizzdesign.nl.
7. Boehm, B. W., & Sullivan, K. J. (2000). Software economics: a roadmap. In Proceedings Conference on the Future of Software Engineering. Limerick, Ireland, June, pp. 319-343.
8. Boekhoudt, P., Jonkers, H., & Rougoor, M. (2000). Graph-based analysis of business process models. In N. Mastorakis (ed.), Mathematics and Computers in Modern Science, Proc. of the WSES/MIUE/HNA International Conference, Montego Bay, Jamaica, Dec., pp. 227-235.
9. Bosch, J., & Grahn, H. (1998). Characterising the performance of three architectural styles. In Proceedings First International Workshop on Software and Performance, Santa Fe, NM, Oct.
10. BPMI (2003), Business Process Management Initiative: Business process modeling notation. working draft (1.0), Aug.
11. Broens, T., Halteren, A. van Sinderen, M.Van, & Wac, K. (2005). Towards an application framework for context-aware m-health applications", in Proc. 11th Open European Summer School (EUNICE 2005), Colmenarejo, Spain, July.
12. Bucher, T., Fischer, R., Kurpjuweit, S., & Winter, R. (2006). Enterprise architecture analysis and application - An exploratory stury. In Proc. EDOC Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2006), Hong Kong.
13. Buuren, R. van, Jonkers, H., Iacob, M.-E., & Strating, P. (2004). Composition of relations in enterprise architcture models. In H. Ehrig, G. Engels, F. Parisi-Presicce, and G. Rozenberg, editors, Graph Transformations - Proceedings of the Second International Conference (LNCS 3256), pages 39-53, Rome, Italy, Sept.
14. Canevet, C., Gilmore, S., Hillston, J., Kloul, L., & Stevens, P. (2004, January). Analysing UML 2.0 activity diagrams in the software performance engineering process. In Proc 4th International Workshop on Software and Performance: ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 29(1).
15. Cortellessa, V., & Mirandola, R. (2000). Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams. In Proceedings 2nd International Workshop on Software and Performance, Ottawa, Canada, Sept., pp. 58-70.
16. Di Marco, A., & Inverardi, P. (2004). Compositional generation of software architecture performance QN models. In J. Magee et al. (eds.), Proc. 4th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA2004), Oslo, Norway, June, pp 37-46.
17. Eck, P. van, Blanken, H., & Wieringa, R. (2004, September). Project GRAAL. Towards operational architecture alignment, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13(3), 235-255.
18. Eertink H., Janssen, W., Oude Luttighuis, P., Teeuw, W., & Vissers, C. (1999). A business process design language. In Proc. 1st World Congress on Formal Methods, Toulouse, France.
19. Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2001). Designing and evaluating E-Business models. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(4), 11-17.
20. Gu, G. P., & Petriu, D. C. (2002). XSLT transformation from UML models to LQN performance models. In Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Software and Performance, Rome, Italy, 2002, pp. 227-234.
21. Harrison, P., & Patel, N. (1992). Performance Modelling of Communication Networks and Computer Architectures. Addison-Wesley.
22. Herzog, U. (2001). Formal methods for performance evaluation, In Lectures on Formal Methods and Performance Analysis: First EEF/Euro Summer School on Trends in Computer Science (LNCS 2090), pages 1-37. Springer Verlag, 2001.
23. Huang, K. (2007). Towards an information technology infrastructure cost model. M.Sc. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
24. Iacob, M.-E., & Jonkers, H. (2004). Quantitative Analysis of Enterprise Architectures. Technical Report ArchiMate D3.5b, Telematica Instituut, Enschede, the Netherlands, Mar.
25. Iacob, M.-E., & Jonkers, H. (2005), Quantitative analysis of enterprise architectures. In Proc. 1st International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications (INTEROP-ESA'05), Geneva, Switzerland, Feb. 2005.
26. IEEE (2000). IEEE standard 1471-2000: Recommended practice for architectural description of soft-ware-intensive systems.
27. Jonkers, H., Janssen, W., Verschut, A., & Wierstra, E. (1998). A unified framework for design and performance analysis of distributed systems. In Proc. 3rd Annual IEEE International Computer Performance and Dependability Symposium (IPDS'98), Durham, NC, USA, Sept., pp. 109-118.
28. Jonkers, H., Boekhoudt, P., Rougoor, M., & Wierstra, E. (1999). Completion time and critical path analysis for the optimisation of business process models. In Obaidat, M., Nisanci, A. and Sadoun, B. editors, Proceedings of the 1999 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, pages 222-229, Chicago, IL, July.
29. Jonkers, H., & Swelm, M. van (1999). Queueing analysis to support distributed system Design, in Obaidat, M.S. and Ajmone Marsan, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, pages 300-307, Chicago, IL, July 1999.
30. Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., Buuren, R. van, Hoppenbrouwers, S., Bonsangue, M., & Torre, L. van der (2004, September). Concepts for Modelling Enterprise Architectures, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13(3), 257-287.
31. Jonkers, H., Iacob, M.-E., Lankhorst, M., & Strating, P. (2005). Integration and Analysis of Functional and Non-Functional Aspects in Model-Driven E-Service Development. In Proc. 9th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2005), Enschede, The Netherlands, Sept.
32. nd International Workshop on Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance (AGTIVE 2003), Charlottesville, VA, USA, Sept. 2003, pp. 243-259.
33. Kazman, R., Bass, L., Abowd, G., & Webb, M. (1994). SAAM: A method for analyzing the properties of software architectures. In Proceedings 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 81-90, Sorento, Italy.
34. Kazman, R., Klein, M., & Clements, P. (2000). ATAM:Method for Architecture Evaluation, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-004 ESC-TR-2000-004, August.
35. Kazman, R., Asundi, J., & Klein, M. (2002). Making Architecture Design Decisions: An Economic Approach, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-035 ESC-TR-2002-035, September.
36. th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2004), Porto, Portugal, April.
37. López-Grao, J. P., Merseguer J., & Campos, J. (2004, January). From UML activity diagrams to Stochastic Petri Nets: Application to software performance engineering. In Proceedings 4th International Workshop on Software and Performance: ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 29(1).
38. Lung, C.-H., Jalnapurkar, A., & El-Rayess, A.(1998). Performance-oriented software architecture analysis: An experience report. In Proceedings First International Workshop on Software and Performance, Santa Fe, NM, Oct.
39. Miller, J., & Mukerji, J. (eds.), (2003). MDA Guide Version 1.0.1, Object Management Group, June.
40. Misof, D. (2007). Process costing with ARIS Business Optimizer. ARIS Expert Paper, IDS Scheer, Jan.
41. OMG (2003), UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance and Time Specification, Version 1.0 (formal/03-09-01), Sept.
42. OMG (2004), UML Profile for Modeling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance Characteristics and Mechanisms (ptc/2004-06-01), 2004.
43. Pooley, R., (1999). Using UML to Derive Stochastic Process Algebra Models, in N. Davies and J. Bradley, editors. UKPEW '99, Proceedings of the Fifteenth UK Performance Engineering Workshop, The University of Bristol, July 1999, pp 23-33.
44. Scheer, A.-W. (1994). Business Process Engineering: Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises, Springer, Berlin, 2nd ed.
45. Schomig, A. and Rau, H. (1995). A petri net approach for the performance analysis of business processes. Technical Report 116, Lehrstuhl fur Informatik III, Universitat Wurzburg.
46. Scott, K. (2004). Fast Track UML 2.0. Apress.
47. Skene, J., & Emmerich, W. (2003a). Model driven performance analysis of enterprise information systems. In Proc. International Workshop on Test and Analysis of Component Based Systems (ETAPS/TACoS), 82(6). Warsaw, Poland, April 2003. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science
48. Skene, J., & Emmerich, W. (2003b). A model driven architecture approach to non-functional analysis of software architectures. In Proc. 18th IEEE Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE'03), Toronto, Canada. Oct.
49. Smith, C. (1990). Performance Engineering of Software Systems. Addison-Wesley.
50. Smith, C. U., & Williams, L. G. (2000). Performance and scalability of disributed software architectures: An SPE approach. Parallel and Distributed Computing Practices, 3(4).
51. Soley, R., & the OMG Staff Strategy Group (2000). Model Driven Architecture. Object Management Group White Paper, Draft 3.2, Nov.
52. Sowa, J. F., & Zachman, J. A. (1992). Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architectures. IBM Systems Journal, 31(3), 590-616.
53. Spitznagel, B., & Garlan, D. (1998). Architecture-based performance analysis. In Proceedings 1998 Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, San Francisco Bay, June.
54. Steen, M. W. A., Akehurst, D. H., Doest, H. W. L. ter, & Lankhorst, M. M. (2004). Supporting viewpoint-oriented enterprise architecture. In Proc. 8th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2004), Monterey, CA, USA, Sept., pp. 201-211.