Analysing UML 2.0 activity diagrams in the software performance engineering process

Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Software and Performance, WOSP'04

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 74-78

  Canevet, C ^a   Gilmore, S ^a   Hillston, J ^a   Klouf, L ^a,b   Stevens, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERSAILLES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); MOBILE COMPUTING; PETRI NETS; PROBABILITY; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SYNCHRONIZATION; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

GLOBAL COMPUTING; PEPA NETS; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGES (UML);

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES;

EID: 3543095725     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/974043.974055     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. C. Canevet, S. Gilmore, J. Hillston, M. Prowse, and P. Stevens. Performance modelling with UML and stochastic process algebras. IEE Proceedings: Computers and Digital Techniques, 150(2): 107-120, Mar. 2003.
2. S. Gilmore, J. Hillston, L. Kloul, and M. Ribaudo. Software performance modelling using PEPA nets. In Proc. of Int. Workshop on Software Performance Modelling (WOSP 2004), 2004. (this volume).
3. H. Jungnitz and A. Desrochers. Flow equivalent nets for the performance analysis of flexible manufacturing systems. In Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 122-127, Sacramento, CA, USA, 1991.
4. C. U. Smith and L. G. Williams. Performance solutions: a practical guide to creating responsive, scalable software. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
5. U2P. Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure version 2.0, April 2003. Available from http://www.omg.org/uml/ as ad/03-04-01.