Model driven performance analysis of enterprise information systems

Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 147-157

  Skene, James ^a   Emmerich, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; MIDDLEWARE; PERFORMANCE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS (EIS); ENTERPRISE JAVA BEAN (EJB); NON-DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; UNIFIED MODELING LANGAUGE (UML);

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 18944401014     PISSN: 15710661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1571-0661(04)81033-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. A. Clark, S. K., A. Evans, "Unambiguous UML (2U) Revised Submission to UML Infrastructure RFP," Object Management Group (2002), http://cgi.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/02-06-14.pdf.
2. Balsamo S. and M. Simeoni, Deriving performance models from software architecture specifications, in: Proceedings of the European Simulation Multiconference 2001 (2001).
3. Balsamo S. and M. Simeoni, On transforming UML models into performance models, in Workshop on Transformations in UML, 2001.
4. Bernardi S., S. Bonatelli and J. Merseguer, From UML sequence diagrams and statecharts to analysable petrie net models, in: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software and Performance (2002), pp. 35-45.
5. Cortellessa V. and R. Mirandola, Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software and Performance (2002), pp. 58-70.
6. Cortellessa V., H. Singh, B., Gunel and V. Bharadwaj, Early reliability assessment of UML based software models, in: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software and Performance (2002), pp. 91-92.
7. Emmerich W. "Engineering Distributed Objecs," 2000;John Wiley and Sons, Ltd
8. Hoeben F., Using UML models for performance calculation, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software and Performance (2000), pp. 77-82.
9. Java Community Process, "UML/EJB Mapping," (2001), http://www.jcp.org/jsr/detail/26.jsp.
10. Kaveh N. and W. Emmerich, Deadlock detection in distributed object systems, in: Joint 8th European Software Engineering Conference (CSEC) and 9th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-9) (2001), pp. 44-51.
11. Lindemann C., A. Thümmler, A. Klemm, M. Lohamann and O. Waldhorst, Performance analysis of time-enhanced UML diagrams based on stochastic processes, in: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software and Performance (2002), pp. 77-82.
12. Lladó C. and P. Harrison, Performance evaluation of an enterprise javabean server implementation, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software and Performance (2000), pp. 180-188.
13. Menascé D., Almedia V. "Capacity Planning for Web Services: Metrics, Models and Methods," 2002;Prentice Hall PTR
14. Microsoft Corporation, ".NET Framework," http://www.microsoft. com/net/.
15. Mos A. and J. Murphy, A framework for performance monitoring, modelling and predication of component oriented distributed systems, in: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software and Performance (2002), pp. 235-236.
16. Object Management Group, "Unified Modelling Language (UML), version 1.3," (2000), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/00-03-01.pdf.
17. Object Management Group, "Model Driven Architecture (MDA)," (2001), http://cgi.omg.org/docs/ormsc/01-07-01.pdf.
18. Object Management Group, "Unified Modelling Language (UML), version 1.4," (2001), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/01-09-67.pdf.
19. Object Management Group, "CORBA Component Model, v33.0," (2002), http://cgi.omg.org/docs/formal/02-06-65.pdf.
20. Object Management Group, "Meta Object Facility (MOF), verison 1.4," (2002), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/02-04-03.pdf.
21. Object Management Group, "UML Profile for Schedulability, Perfor, mance and Time Specification," (2002), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/ 02-03-02.pdf.
22. Petriu D., Shen H. Applying the UML performance profile: Graph grammar-based derivation of LQN models from UML specifications. Performance TOOLS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2324 :2002;159-179
23. Pooley R., Using UML to derive stochastic petri net models, in: Proceedings of the fifteenth UK Performance Engineering Workshop (UKPEW), 1999, pp. 45-56.
24. Pooley R. Using UML to dervice stochastic process algebra models. Proceedigns of the fifteenth UK Performance Engineering Workshop (UKPEW). 1999;23-34
25. Pooley R. Software engineering and performance: A road-map. Future of Software Engineering. 2000;189-200
26. Sun Microsystems, "Enterprise JavaBeans 2.0 Specification Final Release," (2001), http://java.sun.com/j2ee/docs.html.