Supporting viewpoint-oriented enterprise architecture

Proceedings - IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, EDOC

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 201-211

  Steen, M W A ^a   Akehurst, D H ^b   Ter Doest, H W L ^a   Lankhorst, M M ^a  

^a TELEMATICA INSTITUUT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTIONS; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE; STAKEHOLDERS;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SEMANTICS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY;

EID: 17744365750     PISSN: 15417719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EDOC.2004.1342516     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Akehurst, D.H., S. Kent, and O. Patrascoiu, "A relational approach to defining and implementing transformations between metamodels," Journal on Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 2, pp. 215, 2003.
2. Booch G, Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison-Wesley, 1999.
3. Buchanan, R.D., and R.M. Soley. Aligning Enterprise Architecture and IT Investments with Corporate Goals. OMG, 2002.
4. Codagen Technologies Corporation, Codagen MOF 2.0 Query / Views / Transformations Initial Submission, OMG Document ad/03-03-23.
5. Compuware Corporation and Sun Microsystems, Compuware/Sun Initial Submission to the MOF 2.0 Q/V/T RFP. OMG Document ad/03-03-24.
6. Creasy, P. N. and Ellis, G., A Conceptual Graph Approach to Conceptual Schema Integration. In Proc. ICCS'93, Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge Representation: First International Conference on Conceptual Structures. Quebec, Canada, 1993.
7. Czarnecki, K. and Helsen, S., Classification of Model Transformation Approaches, In: OOPSLA'03 Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture, 2003.
8. Finkelstein, A., J. Kramer, B. Nuseibeh, L. Finkelstein, and M. Goedicke. Viewpoints: a framework for integrating multiple perspectives in system development. International Journal on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Special issue on Trends and Research Directions in Software Engineering Environments, 2(1), pp. 31-58, March 1992.
9. Gardner, T., Griffin, C., Koehler, J, and Hauser, R., A review of OMG MOF 2.0 Query / Views / Transformations Submissions and Recommendations towards the final standard. OMG Document ad/03-08-02.
10. Garlan D, Monroe, RT, Wile D. ACME: An Architecture Description Interchange Language, in Proc.CASCON '97, Toronto, Canada, Nov. 1997, p. 169-183.
11. Iacob, M.-E., et al., State of the Art in Architecture Support, ArchiMate deliverable D3.1, Telematica Instituut, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2002. https://doc.telin.nl/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-27882/
12. IEEE Architecture Working Group. IEEE Std 1471-2000, IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems. IEEE, USA, 2000.
13. ITU, ITU Recommendation X.901 ISO/IEC 10746-1: 1996, Open Distributed Processing - Reference Model - Part 1: Overview, 1996.
14. th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2003), Brisbane, Australia, Sept. 2003.
15. Jonkers, H. (ed.), de Boer, F., Bonsangue, M., van Buuren, R., Groenewegen, L., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Lankhorst, M.M., Proper, H.A., Stam, A., van der Torre, L., Veldhuijzen van Zanten, G., Concepts for Architectural Description v3.0, Enschede: Telematica Instituut, 2004.
16. KMF-team, "Kent Modelling Framework (KMF)," 2002, www.cs.kent.ac.uk/projects/kmf
17. Kotonya, G. and I. Sommerville. Viewpoints for requirements definition. IEE/BCS Software Engineering Journal, 7(6):375-387, November 1992.
18. Kruchten, P., Architectural Blueprints - The "4+1" view model of software architecture, IEEE Software, 12 (6), Nov. 1995, pp. 42-50.
19. Nuseibeh, B.A., A Multi-Perspective Framework for Method Integration. PhD thesis, Imperial College, University of London, 1994.
20. Object Management Group, Model Driven Architecture, http://www.omg.org/ mda
21. Object Management Group, MOF 2.0 Query/Views/Transformations RFP, OMG, ad/2002-04-10, April 2002.
22. Open Group, The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF): http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/start.htm
23. Reeves, J., M. Marashi, and D. Budgen. A software design framework or how to support real designers. IEE/BCS Software Engineering Journal, 10(4):141-155, July 1995.
24. Schefstroem D, and G. van den Broek. Tool Integration: Environments and Frameworks, New York: Wiley, 1993.
25. Sowa, J.F. and J.A. Zachman, Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture, IBM Systems Journal, 31 (3), 1992, pp. 590-616.
26. Wegmann, A., On the systemic enterprise architecture methodology (SEAM). In: Proceedings International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2003), Angers, France, 2003.
27. White SA. Business Process Modeling Notation, Working Draft (1.0) August 25, 2003. Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI), 2003.