Integration and analysis of functional and non-functional aspects in model-driven e-service development

Proceedings - IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, EDOC

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 229-238

  Jonkers, Henk ^a   Iacob, Maria Eugenia ^a   Lankhorst, Marc M ^a   Strating, Patrick ^a  

^a TELEMATICA INSTITUUT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; FUNCTIONS; INTEGRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

E-SERVICE DEVELOPMENTS; MODEL TRANSFORMATIONS; NON FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS; SERVICE DESIGN PROCESSES;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 33746098452     PISSN: 15417719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EDOC.2005.18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Alsaadi, A., "A performance analysis approach based on the UML class diagram", in Proc 4th International Workshop on Software and Performance: A CM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 29, no. 1, Jan. 2004.
2. Balsamo, S., Simeoni M., Deriving Performance Models from Software Architecture Specifications, Proceedings of the 15th European Simulation Multiconference (ESM2001), SCS - Society for Computer Simulation, 2001.
3. Balsamo, S., Simeoni M., On Transforming UML models into performance models, Technical Report Saladin Project R-SAL-51, WTUML: Workshop on Transformations in UML, ETAPS 2001 Satellite Event Genova, Italy, April 7th, 2001.
4. Bernardi, S., S. Donatelli and J. Merseguer, "From UML sequence diagrams and statecharts to analysable Petri net models", in Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Software and Performance, Rome, Italy, 2002, pp. 35-45.
5. Boekhoudt, P., H. Jonkers and M. Rougoor, "Graph-based analysis of business process models", in N. Mastorakis (ed.), Mathematics and Computers in Modern Science, Proc, of the WSES/MIUE/HNA International Conference, Montego Bay, Jamaica, Dec. 2000, pp. 227-235.
6. Broens, T., A. van Halteren, M. van Sinderen and K. Wac, "Towards an application framework for context-aware m-health applications", in Proc. 11th Open European Summer School (EUNICE 2005), Colmenarejo, Spain, July 2005.
7. Canevet, C., S. Gilmore, J. Hillston, L. Kloul and P. Stevens, "Analysing UML 2.0 activity diagrams in the software performance engineering process", in Proc 4th International Workshop on Software and Performance: ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 29, no, 1, Jan. 2004.
8. Cortellessa, V. and R. Mirandola, "Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams", in Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Software and Performance, Ottawa, Canada, Sept. 2000, pp, 58-70.
9. Di Marco, A. and P. Inverardi, "Compositional generation of software architecture performance QN models", in J. Magee et al. (eds.), Proc. 4th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA2004), Oslo, Norway, June 2004, pp 37-46.
10. Eck, P. van, H. Blanken and R. Wieringa, "Project GRAAL. Towards operational architecture alignment", International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, vol. 13, nr, 3, Sept. 2004, pp. 235-255.
11. Eertink H., W. Janssen, P. Oude Luttighuis, W. Teeuw and C. Vissers, "A business process design language", in Proc. 1st World Congress on Formal Methods, Toulouse, France, 1999.
12. Gu, G.P. and D.C, Petriu, "XSLT transformation from UML models to LQN performance models", in Proc, 3rd International Workshop on Software and Performance, Rome, Italy, 2002, pp, 227-234.
13. Iacob, M.-E. and H. Jonkers, "Quantitative analysis of enterprise architectures", in Proc. 1st International Confer ence on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications (INTEROP-ESA'05), Geneva, Switzerland, Feb. 2005.
14. Jonkers, H., W. Janssen, A. Verschut and E. Wierstra, "A unified framework for design and performance analysis of distributed systems", in Proc. 3rd Annual IEEE International Computer Performance and Dependability Symposium (IPDS'98), Durham, NC, USA, Sept. 1998, pp. 109-118.
15. Jonkers, H., M. Lankhorst, R. van Buuren, S. Hoppenbrouwers, M. Bonsangue and L. van der Torre, "Concepts for Modelling Enterprise Architectures", International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, vol. 13, no. 3, Sept. 2004, pp. 257-287.
16. Keller, A. and H. Ludwig, "The WSLA framework: Specifying and monitoring Service Level Agreements for Web Services", Journal of Network and Systems Management, Special Issue on E-Business Management, vol. 11, nr. 1, March 2003.
17. th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2004), Porto, Portugal, April 2004.
18. López-Grao, J.P., J. Merseguer and J. Campos, "From UML activity diagrams to Stochastic Petri Nets: Application to software performance engineering", in Proc. 4th International Workshop on Software and Performance: ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 29, no. 1, Jan. 2004.
19. Miller, J. and J. Mukerji (eds.), MDA Guide Version 1.0.1, Object Management Group, June 2003.
20. Object Management Group, UML Profile for Schedulability,Performance and Time Specification, Version 1.0 (formal/03-09-01), Sept. 2003.
21. Object Management Group, UML Profile for Modeling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance Characteristics and Mechanisms (ptc/2004-06-01), 2004.
22. Pooley, R., "Using UML to Derive Stochastic Process Algebra Models", in N. Davies and J. Bradley, editors. UKPEW '99, Proceedings of the Fifteenth UK Performance Engineering Workshop, The University of Bristol, July 1999, pp23-33.
23. Scheer, A.-W., Business Process Engineering: Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises, Springer, Berlin, 2nd ed., 1994.
24. Skene, J. and W. Emmerich, "Model driven performance analysis of enterprise information systems", in Proc. International Workshop on Test and Analysis of Component Based Systems (ETAPS/TACoS), Warsaw, Poland, April 2003. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science vol. 82, no. 6, 2003a.
25. Skene, J. and W. Emmerich, "A model driven architecture approach to non-functional analysis of software architectures", in Proc. 18th IEEE Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE'03), Toronto, Canada. Oct. 2003b.
26. Skene, J., D.D. Lamanna and W. Emmerich, "Precise Service Level Agreements", in Proc. 26th Int. Conference on Software Engineering, Edinburgh, UK, May 2004, pp. 179-188.
27. Smith, C.U. and L.G. Williams, "Performance and scalability of disributed software architectures: An SPE approach", Parallel and Distributed Computing Practices, vol. 3, nr 4, 2000.
28. Soley, R. and the OMG Staff Strategy Group, Model Driven Architecture, Object Management Group White Paper, Draft 3.2, Nov. 2000.
29. Sowa, J.F. and J.A. Zachman, 'Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architectures', IBM Systems Journal, 31(3), 1992, pp. 590-616.
30. Steen, M.W.A, D.H. Akehurst, H.W.L. ter Doest and M.M. Lankhorst, "Supporting viewpoint-oriented enterprise architecture", in Proc. 8th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2004), Monterey, CA, USA, Sept. 2004, pp. 201-211.