Concepts for modeling enterprise architectures

International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 257-287

  Jonkers, Henk ^a   Lankhorst, Marc ^a   Van Buuren, René ^a   Hoppenbrouwers, Stijn ^b   Bonsangue, Marcello ^c   Van Der Torre, Leendert ^d  

^a TELEMATICA INSTITUUT   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d National Research Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Business ict alignment; Concepts; Enterprise architecture; Modeling; Service oriented architectures

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; VISUALIZATION;

ARCHITECTURAL DOMAIN; BUSINESS-ICT ALIGNMENT; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; SERVICE-ORIENTED ARCHITECTURES; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 8644282175     PISSN: 02188430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218843004000985     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. A. Arkin, Business Process Modeling Language, BPMI.org (2002), http://www.bpmi.org/bpmi-downloads/BPML1.0.zip.
2. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh and I. Jacobson, The Unified Modeling Language User Guide (Addison-Wesley, 1999).
3. Business Process Management Initiative, Business Process Modeling Notation, Working Draft (1.0) (August 2003), http://www.bpmi.org.
4. Business Process Project Team, ebXML Business Process Specification Schema Version 1.01 (2001), UN/CEFACT and OASIS, http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ ebBPSS.pdf.
5. H. Eertink, W. Janssen, P. O. Luttighuis, W. Teeuw and C. Vissers, A business process design language, in Proc. 1st World Congress on Formal Methods, September 1999, Toulouse, France.
6. H.-E. Eriksson and M. Penker, Business Modeling with UML: Business Patterns at Work (J. Wiley, 2000).
7. D. S. Frankel, Model Driven Architecture: Applying MDA to Enterprise Computing (Wiley, 2003).
8. D. Garlan, R. T. Monroe and D. Wile, ACME: An Architecture Description Interchange Language, in Proc. CASCON '97, November 1997, Toronto, Canada, pp. 169-183.
9. J. C. Henderson and N. Venkatraman, Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations, IBM Systems Journal 32(1) 1993.
10. IDEF, Integration Definition for Function Modeling (IDEF0) Draft, Federal Information Processing Standards Publication FIPSPUB 183, US Department of Commerce, December 1993, Springfield, VA, USA.
11. IEEE Computer Society, IEEE Std 1471-2000: IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems, October 9, 2000.
12. ISO, Basic Reference Model for Open Systems Interconnection, ISO 7498, International Organization for Standardisation, 1984.
13. ITU-T, Information technology - Open Distributed Processing - Reference Model -Enterprise Language, ITU-T Recommendation X.911 ISO/IEC 15414. International Telecommunication Union, 2002.
14. H. Jonkers et al., Towards a language for coherent enterprise architecture description, in Proc. 7th IEEE Int. Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conf. (EDOC 2003), eds. M. Steen and B. R. Bryant, September 2003, Brisbane, Australia.
15. G. Labovitz and V. Rosansky, The Power of Alignment (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1997).
16. N. Medvidovic and R. N. Taylor, A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages, IEEE Trans. Software Engineering 26(1) (January 2000) 70-93.
17. J. Morabito, I. Sack and A. Bhate, Organizational Modeling (Prentice Hall PTR, 1999).
18. D. A. Nadler, M. S. Gerstein, R. B. Shaw and Associates, Organizational Architecture: Designs for Changing Organizations (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1992).
19. Object Management Group, Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, version 1.4, April 2002a.
20. Object Management Group, UML Profile for Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Specification (2002b), www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-09-05.pdf.
21. Object Managment Group, Unified Modeling Language (UML) Specification: Infrastructure. Version 2.0 (2003a), www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-09-15.pdf.
22. Object Managrnent Group, UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification (2003b), www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-08-02.pdf.
23. V. E. van Reijswoud and J. L. G. Dietz, DEMO Modeling Handbook, Delft University of Technology, Department of Information Systems, 1 (1999).
24. A.-W. Scheer, Business Process Engineering: Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
25. J. F. Sowa and J. A. Zachman, Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture, IBM Systems J. 31(3) (1992) 590-616.
26. M. W. A. Steen, M. M. Lankhorst and R. G. van de Wetering, modeling networked enterprises, in Proc. 6th Int. Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conf. (EDOC'02), September 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 109-119.
27. The Open Group, The Open Group Architectural Framework Version 8 (2003), http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/.
28. S. Tyndale-Biscoe, RM-ODP Enterprise Language ISO/ITU-T 15414/X911 (2002), http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/com17/tutorial/81999_pp7.ppt.
29. R. van Buuren, S. Hoppenbrouwers, H. Jonkers and M. Lankhorst, Architecture Language Reference Manual, ArchiMate deliverable D2.2.2b, version 3.0, Telematica Instituut, April 2004, Enschede, the Netherlands.