Scaffolding science teachers in open-inquiry teaching

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 829-850

  van der Valk, Ton ^a   de Jong, Onno ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449567437     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690802287155     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adams, J.E. (2000). Taking charge of curriculum: Teacher networks and curriculum implementation. New York: Teacher College Press.
2. Bailey, T.R., Hughes, K.L., & Moore, D.T. (2004). Working knowledge. Work-based learning and education reform. New York/London: RoutledgeFalmer.
3. Baxter, J.A., & Lederman, N.G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 147-161). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
4. Berg, C.A.R., Bergendahl, V.C.B., Lundberg, B.K.S., & Tibell, L.A.E. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 351-372.
5. Bliss, J., Askew, M., & Macrae, S. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Scaffolding revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 22, 37-61.
6. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning. Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3-16.
7. Crawford, B.A., Krajcik, J.S., & Marx, R.W. (1999). Elements of a community of learners in a middle school science classroom. Science Education, 83, 701-723.
8. Davis, E.A., & Linn, M.C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 819-837.
9. de Jong, O., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (1998). Research on science teacher education in Europe: Teacher thinking and conceptual change. In B. Frazer & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 745-758). Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Boston, MA: Kluwer.
10. Fellows, N. (1994). A window to thinking: using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 985-1001.
11. Gallagher, J.J., & Tobin, K. (1987). Teacher management and student engagement in high school science. Science Education, 71, 535-555.
12. Gibson, H.L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes towards science. Science Education, 86, 693-705.
13. Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22, 85-142.
14. Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M, & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791-806.
15. Hofstein, A., Shore, R., & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 47-62.
16. Janesick, V.J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 379-399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Korthagen, F.J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Lunetta, V.N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M.P. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: an analysis of research, theory, and practice. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393-441). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. McBride, J.W., I Bhatti, M., Hannan, M.A., & Feinberg, M. (2004). Using an inquiry approach to teach science to secondary school science teachers. Physics Education, 39, 434-439.
20. McDermott, L.C. (1996). Physics by inquiry. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
21. Mercer, N., & Fisher, E. (1992). How do teachers help children to learn? An analysis of teachers' interventions in computer-based tasks. Learning and Instruction, 2, 339-355.
22. Putnam, R.T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15.
23. Reigosa, C., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.-P. (2007). Scaffolding problem-solving in the physics and chemistry laboratory: Difficulties hindering students' assumption of responsibility. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 307-329.
24. Richardson, V. (1992). The agenda-setting dilemma in a constructivist staff development process. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 287-300.
25. Roth, W.-M. (1994). Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 197-223.
26. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Boston, MA: Kluwer.
27. Roydchoudhury, A. & Roth, W. (1996). Interactions in an open-inquiry physics laboratory. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 423-445.
28. Smits, Th. J.M. (2003). Werken aan kwaliteitsverbetering van leerlingonderzoek [Working on quality improvement of student investigations]. Ph.D. thesis, Catholic University Nijmegen. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-β Press.
29. Solomon, J., Scott, L., & Duveen, J. (1996). Large-scale exploration of pupils' understanding of the nature of science. Science Education, 80, 493-508.
30. Tomkins, S.P., & Tunnicliffe, S.D. (2001). Looking for ideas: Observation, interpretation and hypothesis-making by 12 year-old pupils undertaking science investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 791-813.
31. Van Driel, J., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137-158.
32. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processess. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Wood, D., Bruber, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.