Pre-clinical pharmacology training in a student-centered veterinary curriculum

Journal of Veterinary Medical Education

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 260-270

  Buur, Jennifer L ^a  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Case based teaching; Curriculum structure; Pharmacology

Indexed keywords

VETERINARY DRUG;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHARMACOLOGY; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; SCHOOL; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; CALIFORNIA; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, VETERINARY; HUMANS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PHARMACOLOGY; PRECEPTORSHIP; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; SCHOOLS, VETERINARY; VETERINARY DRUGS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 70449435657     PISSN: 0748321X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/jvme.36.3.260     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine. DVM Degree Course Digest . Accessed 12/18/08. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, 2008.
2. North Carolina State University. Doctor of Veterinary Medicine Professional Program: Fourth Year Professional Program . Accessed 12/18/08. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 2008.
3. United States Food and Drug Administration. Green Book On-Line < http://www.fda.gov/cvm/Green-Book/greenbook.html > Accessed 12/11/08. United States Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, 2008.
4. United States Food and Drug Administration. Animal Medicinal Drug Use Clarification Act. Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations, part 530, 1994.
5. Kwan CY. Problem-based learning and teaching of medical pharmacology. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 366: 10-17, 2002.
6. Azer SA, Frauman AG. Seeing the wood for the trees: approaches to teaching and assessing clinical pharmacology and therapeutics in a problem-based learning course. Ann Acad Med Singapore 37: 204-209, 2008.
7. Edmondson KM. Applying what we know about learning to veterinary education. J Vet Med Educ 28: 54-55, 2001.
8. Collins GH. The Professional Practice program in the University of Sydney curriculum. J Vet Med Educ 29: 81-83, 2002.
9. Howell NE, Lane IF, Brace JJ, Shull RM. Integration of problem-based learning in a veterinary medical curriculum: first-year experiences with Application-Based Learning Exercises at the University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine. J Vet Med Educ 29: 169-175, 2002.
10. Turnwald GH, Sponenberg DP, Meldrum JB. Part II: directions and objectives of curriculum structure at veterinary medical and other health professions schools. J Vet Med Educ 35: 74-90, 2008.
11. Karriker M, Wiebe V. Pharmacists in veterinary education: bridging the gap. J Vet Med Educ 33: 248-252, 2006.
12. Kochevar DT. Information technology in veterinary pharmacology instruction. J Vet Med Educ 30: 331-337, 2003.
13. Bajcar J, Kennie N, Iglar K. Teaching pharmacotherapeutics to family medicine residents: a curriculum. Can Earn Physician 54: 549, 2008.
14. Newman MJ. Problem based learning: an introduction and overview of the key features of the approach. J Vet Med Educ 32: 12-20, 2005.
15. Barrows HS. Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 2000.
16. O'Neill G, McMahon T. Student-centered learning: what does it mean for students and lecturers? In O'Neill G, Moore S, McMullin B, eds. Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching. Dublin: AISHE Publishing, 2005: 27-36.
17. Fuentealba C, Mason RV, Johnston SD. Communitybased clinical veterinary education at Western University of Health Sciences. J Vet Med Educ 35: 34-42, 2008.
18. Schmidt PL, Trevejo RT, Tkalcic S. Veterinary public health in a problem-based learning curriculum at the Western University of Health Sciences. J Vet Med Educ 35: 212-218, 2008.
19. American College of Veterinary Clinical Pharmacology. Phase I Examination Information . Accessed 03/31/09. American College of Veterinary Clinical Pharmacology.
20. Michel MC, Bischoff A, Jakobs KH. Comparison of problem-and lecture-based pharmacology teaching. Trends Pharmacol Sci 23: 168-170, 2002. (Pubitemid 34270598)
21. Michel MC, Bischoff A, ZuHeringdorf M, Neumann D, Jakobs KH. Problem-vs. lecture-based pharmacology teaching in a German medical school. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 366: 64-68, 2002.
22. Antepohl W, Herzig S. Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in a course of basic pharmacology: a controlled, randomized study. Med Educ 33: 106-113, 1999.
23. Herzig S, Linke RM, Marxen B, Borner U, Antepohl W. Long-term follow up of factual knowledge after a single, randomised problem-based learning course. BMC Med Educ 3: 3, 2003.
24. Tamayo G, Santibanez M, Javier Meana J. Evaluation of a pharmacology educational activity based on a research project: a randomized, controlled and blind analysis of medical students' perceptions. Med Teach 27: 53-60, 2005.
25. Yew EH, Schmidt HG. Evidence for constructive, self-regulatory, and collaborative processes in problembased learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 14: 251-273, 2009.
26. Matthes J, Look A, Hahne AK, Tekian A, Herzig S. The semi-structured triple jump-a new assessment tool reflects qualifications of tutors in a PBL course on basic pharmacology. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 377: 55-63, 2008.
27. Rangachari PK. Student-designed clinical trials: evaluating self-directed learning in pharmacology. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 366: 144-47, 2002.
28. Jaarsma DA, Dolmans DH, Scherpbier AJ, Van Beukelen P. Preparation for practice by veterinary school: a comparison of the perceptions of alumni from a traditional and an innovative veterinary curriculum. J Vet Med Educ 35: 431-438, 2008.
29. Quinlan KM. Effects of problem-based learning curricula on faculty learning: new lenses, new questions. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 8: 249-259, 2003.