Individual strategies in artificial grammar learning

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 293-307

  Visser, Ingmar ^a   Raijmakers, Maartje E J ^a   Pothos, Emmanuel M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECALL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS; SYMBOLISM;

HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS; SYMBOLISM; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 70350743189     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267-281). Budapest: Academiai Kiado.
2. Altmann, G. T. M., Dienes, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 899-912.
3. Berry, C. J., Shanks, D. R., & Henson, R. N. A. (2008). A single-system account of the relationship between priming, recognition, and fluency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 97-111.
4. Boucher, L., & Dienes, Z. (2003). Two ways of learning associations. Cognitive Science, 27, 807-842.
5. Bouwmeester, S., Sijtsma, K., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent class regression analysis to describe cognitive developmental phenomena: An application to transitive reasoning. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 67-86.
6. Chan, C. (1992). Implicit cognitive processes: Theoretical issues and applications in computer systems design. Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.
7. Chater, N., & Hahn, U. (1997). Representational distortion, similarity and the universal law of generalization. In Proceedings of the Similarity and Categorization Workshop 97 (pp. 31-36). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
8. Cleeremans, A. (2005). Computational correlates of consciousness. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 81-98.
9. Conway, C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Modality constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 24-39.
10. Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2006). Statistical learning within and between modalities: Pitting abstract against stimulus specific representations. Psychological Science, 17, 905-912.
11. Dienes, Z. (1992). Connectionist and memory-array models of artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Science, 16, 41-79.
12. Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 735-808.
13. Dulany, D. E. (1997). Consciousness in the explicit (deliberative) and implicit (evocative). In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 179-211). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Dulany, D. E. (2003). Strategies for putting consciousness in its place. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 33-43.
15. Dulany, D. E., Carlson, R. A., & Dewey, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-555.
16. Eldridge, L. L., Masterman, D., & Knowlton, B. J. (2002). Intact implicit habit learning in Alzheimer's disease. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 722-726.
17. Gebauer, G. F., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2007). Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 34-54.
18. Grün, B., & Leisch, F. (2007). Fitting finite mixtures of generalized linear regressions in R. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51, 5247-5252.
19. Henson, R. (2006). Forward inference using functional neuroimaging: Dissociations versus associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 64-69.
20. Higham, P. A. (1997). Dissociations of grammaticality and specific similarity effects in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1029-1045.
21. Huang, G.-H., & Bandeen-Roche, K. (2004). Building an identifiable latent class model with covariate effects on underlying and measured variables. Psychometrika, 69, 5-32.
22. Jamieson, R. K., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2005). The influence of grammatical, local, and organizational redundancy on implicit learning: An analysis using information theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 9-23.
23. Johansen, M. K., & Palmeri, T. J. (2002). Are there representational shifts during category learning? Cognitive Psychology, 45, 482-553.
24. Johnstone, T., & Shanks, D. (1999). Two mechanisms in implicit grammar learning? Comment on Meulemans and Van der Linden (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 524-531.
25. Juola, P., & Plunkett, K. (1998). Why double dissociations don't mean much. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 561-566). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Kim, J. (1992). Multiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52, 1-26.
27. Kinder, A., & Assmann, A. (2000). Learning artificial grammars: No evidence for the acquisition of rules. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1321-1332.
28. Kinder, A., & Shanks, D. R. (2001). Amnesia and the declarative/ nondeclarative distinction: A recurrent network model of classification, recognition, and repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 648-669.
29. Knowlton, B. J. (1999). What can neuropsychology tell us about category learning? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 123-124.
30. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 169-181.
31. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
32. Leisch, F. (2004). FlexMix: A general framework for finite mixture models and latent class regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 11. Retrieved January 7, 2008, from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v11/i08/
33. Lin, T. H., & Dayton, C. M. (1997). Model selection information criteria for non-nested latent class models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 249-264.
34. Lorch, R. F. Jr., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
35. Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., Stanley, W. B., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J. R., & Druhan, B. (1989). Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1083-1100.
36. McAndrews, M. P., & Moscovitch, M. (1985). Rule-based and exemplar-based classification in artificial grammar learning. Memory & Cognition, 13, 469-475.
37. McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.
38. Meulemans, T., & van der Linden, M. (1997). Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1007-1028.
39. Miller, G. A. (1958). Free recall of redundant strings of letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 485-491.
40. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
41. Plunkett, K., & Bandelow, S. (2006). Stochastic approaches to understanding dissociations in inflectional morphology. Brain and Language, 98, 194-209.
42. Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 59-63.
43. Pothos, E. M. (2005). The rules versus similarity distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 1-49.
44. Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 227-244.
45. Pothos, E. M., & Bailey, T. M. (2000). The importance of similarity in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 847-862.
46. Pothos, E. M., Chater, N., & Ziori, E. (2006). Does stimulus appearance affect learning? American Journal of Psychology, 119, 277-301.
47. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with the " the language-as-fixedeffect fallacy" : Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.
48. Raijmakers, M. E. J., & Visser, I. (2009). Statistical models of intra-and inter-individual differences and errors in category learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
49. R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
50. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
51. Reber, A. R., & Allen, R. (1978). Analogic and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functional interpretation, Cognition, 6, 189-221.
52. Redington, F. M., & Chater, N. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: Methodological issues and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123-138.
53. Schmitz, N., Malla, A., Norman, R., Archie, S., & Zipursky, R. (2007). Inconsistency in the relationship between duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and negative symptoms: Sorting out the problem of heterogeneity. Schizophrenia Research, 93, 152-159.
54. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
55. Shanks, D. R., Johnstone, T., & Staggs, L. (1997). Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 216-252.
56. Shanks, D. R., & Perruchet, P. (2002). Dissociation between priming and recognition in the expression of sequential knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 362-367.
57. Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
58. Tunney, R. J., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2001). Two models of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 614-639.
59. Tunney, R. J., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1060-1071.
60. Visser, I., Schmittmann, V. D., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2007). Markov process models for discrimination learning. In K. van Montfort, H. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 337-365). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Vokey, J. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammar. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 328-344.
62. Wang, P., & Puterman, M. L. (1998). Mixed logistic regression models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 3, 175-200.
63. Wang, P., Puterman, M. L., Cockburn, I. M., & Le, N. D. (1996). Mixed Poisson regression models with covariate dependent rates. Biometrics, 52, 381-400.
64. Yamaguchi, K. (2000). Multinomial logit latent-class regression models: An analysis of the predictors of gender-role attitudes among Japanese women. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1702-1740.