Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1060-1071

  Tunney, Richard J ^a,b   Shanks, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNITED KINGDOM; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0345097639     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196127     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ALLWOOD, C. M., GRANHAG, P. A., & JOHANSSON, H. (2000). Realism in confidence judgments of performance based on implicit learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 165-188.
2. BARANSKI, J. V., & PETRUSIC, W. M. (2001). Testing architectures of the decision-confidence relation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 195-206.
3. BROOKS, L. R., & VOKEY, J. R. (1991). Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al. (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 316-323.
4. CHAN, C. (1992). Implicit cognitive processes: Theoretical issues and applications in computer systems design. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Oxford.
5. CHANNON, S., SHANKS, D., JOHNSTONE, T., VAKILI, K., CHIN, J., & SINCLAIR, E. (2002). Is implicit learning spared in amnesia? Rule abstraction and item familiarity in artificial grammar learning. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2185-2197.
6. CHEESMAN, J., & MERIKLE, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 387-395.
7. DEHAENE, S., & NACCACHE, L. (2001). Toward a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1-37.
8. DIENES, Z., & ALTMANN, G. [T. M.] (1997). Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains: How implicit and how abstract? In D. C. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 107-123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. DIENES, Z., ALTMANN, G. T. M., KWAN, L., & GOODE, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1322-1338.
10. DULANY, D. E., CARLSON, R. A., & DEWEY, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-555.
11. ELDRIDGE, L. L., SARFATTI, S., & KNOWLTON, B. J. (2002). The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 139-145.
12. ERDELYI, M. H. (1974). A new look at the new look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review, 81, 1-25.
13. ERIKSEN, C. W. (1960). Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation. Psychological Review, 67, 279-300.
14. GABRIELI, J. D. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 87-115.
15. GOMEZ, R. L., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1994). What is learned from artificial grammars? Transfer tests of simple association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 396-410.
16. HOLENDER, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 9, 1-66.
17. JUSLIN, P., WINMAN, A., & OLSSON, H. (2000). Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard-easy effect. Psychological Review, 107, 384-396.
18. KELLEY, C. M., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 1-24.
19. KELLY, S. W., BURTON, A. M., KATO, T., & AKAMATSU, S. (2001). Incidental learning of real world regularities in Britain and Japan. Psychological Science, 12, 86-89.
20. KINDER, A., & SHANKS, D. R. (2001). Amnesia and the declarative/ procedural distinction: A recurrent network model of classification, recognition, and repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 648-669.
21. KNOWLTON, B. J., RAMUS, S. J., & SQUIRE, L. R. (1992). Intact artificial grammar learning in amnesia: Dissociation of classification learning and explicit memory for specific instances. Pychological Science, 3, 172-179.
22. KNOWLTON, B. J., & SQUIRE, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 169-181.
23. KORIAT, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness & Cognition, 9, 149-171.
24. KUNIMOTO, C., MILLER, J., & PASHLER, H. (2001). Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Consciousness & Cognition, 10, 294-340.
25. LICHTENSTEIN, S., FISCHOFF, B., & PHILLIPS, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306-334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. McCLELLAND, A. G. R., & BOLGER, F. (1994). The calibration of subjective probabilities: Theories and models 1980-94. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 453-482). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
28. MEULEMANS, T., & VAN DER LINDEN, M. (2002). Artificial grammar learning in amnesia. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (pp. 144-164). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
29. NELSON, T. O. 1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
30. NEWELL, B, R., & BRIGHT, J. E. H. (2002). Well past midnight: Calling time on implicit invariant learning? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 185-205.
31. PEIRCE, C. S., & JASTROW, J. (1884). On small differences of sensation. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, 3, 75-83.
32. PERRUCHET, P., & PACTEAU, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
33. REBER, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
34. REBER, A. S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 115-119.
35. REDINGTON, M., & CHATER, N. (2002). Knowledge representation and transfer in artificial grammar learning. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making. (pp. 121-143). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
36. SHANKS, D. R., & ST. JOHN, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
37. SHAW, J. S., III, McCLURE, K. A., & WILKENS, C. E. (2001). Recognition instructions and recognition practice can alter the confidence-response time relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 93-103.
38. TUNNEY, R. J., & ALTMANN, G. T. M. (2001). Two modes of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1322-1333.
39. WELLMAN, H. M. (1977). Tip of the tongue and feeling of knowing experiences: A developmental study of memory monitoring. Child Development, 48, 432-444.
40. WRIGHT, G., & AYTON, P. (1988). Decision time, subjective probability, and task difficulty. Memory & Cognition, 16, 176-185.
41. YATES, J. F. (1990). Judgment and decision making. London: Prentice-Hall.