Identity and difference: Complicating gender in archaeology

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volumn 38, Issue , 2009, Pages 65-81

  Geller, Pamela L ^a  

^a University of Miami   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioarchaeology; Feminism; Postmodernism; Race; Sexuality

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; FEMINISM; GENDER DISPARITY; GENDER IDENTITY; LABOR DIVISION; POST-MODERNISM; RACE; SEXUALITY;

EID: 70350454000     PISSN: 00846570     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414     Document Type: Article

References (159)

1. Alberti B. 2001. Faience goddesses and ivory bull-leapers: the aesthetics of sexual difference at Late Bronze Age Knossos. World Archaeol. 33(2):189-205
2. Alberti B. 2006. Archaeology, men, and masculinities. See Nelson 2006, pp. 401-34
3. Ardren T, ed. 2002. Ancient Maya Women. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
4. Ardren T, Hixson D. 2006. The unusual sculptures of Telantunich, Yucatan: phalli and the concept of masculinity in ancient Maya thought. Camb. Archaeol. J. 16:1-20
5. Armelagos GJ. 1998. Introduction: sex, gender, and health status in prehistoric and contemporary populations. In Sex and Gender in Paleopathological Perspective, ed. AL Grauer, P Stuart-Macadam, pp. 1-10. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
6. Arnold B. 2005. Teaching with intent: the archaeology of gender. Archaeologies 1(2):83-93
7. Bailey C. 1997. Making waves and drawing lines: the politics of defining the vicissitudes of feminism. Hypatia 12(3):17-28
8. Battle WL. 2004. A yard to sweep: race, gender and the enslaved landscape. PhD thesis. Univ. Tex., Austin. 181 pp.
9. Battle-Baptiste WL. 2007. The other from within: a commentary. In Past Meets Present: Archaeologists Partnering with Museums Curators, Teachers, and Community Groups, ed. JH Jameson, S Baugher, pp. 101-6. New York: Springer
10. Baxter JE. 2008. The archaeology of childhood. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 37:159-75
11. Bertelsen R, Lillehammer A, Naess J-R, eds. 1987. Were They All Men? An Examination of Sex Roles in Prehistoric Society. Acts from a workshop held at Ulstein Kloster, Rogaland, Nov. 2-4, 1979. Stavanger, Nor.: Arkeol. Mus. Stavanger
12. Bevan L, ed. 2001. Indecent Exposure: Sexuality, Society and the Archaeological Record. Glasgow: Cruithne
13. Boellstorff T. 2007. Queer studies in the house of anthropology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 36:17-35
14. Bolger D, ed. 2008. Gender through Time in the Ancient Near East. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
15. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
16. Brumbach HJ, Jarvenpa R. 2006. Gender dynamics in hunter-gatherer society: archaeological methods and perspectives. See Nelson 2006, pp. 503-35
17. Brumfiel EM. 2006. Cloth, gender, continuity, and change: fabricating unity in anthropology. Am. Anthropol. 108(4):862-77
18. Butler J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge
19. Butler J. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge
20. Casella EC. 2000. 'Doing trade': a sexual economy of nineteenth-century Australian female convict prisons. See Dowson 2000, pp. 209-21
21. Claassen C, ed. 1992. Exploring Gender through Archaeology: Selected Papers from the 1991 Boone Conference. Madison, WI: Prehistory Press
22. Clark BJ. 2003. On the edge of purgatory: an archaeology of ethnicity and gender in Hispanic Colorado. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., Berkeley. 307 pp.
23. Cobbs H. 2005. Straight down the line? A queer consideration of hunter-gatherer studies in north-west Europe. World Archaeol. 73:630-36
24. Collier JF, Yanagisako SJ. 1987. Toward a unified analysis of gender and kinship. In Gender and Kinship: Essays toward a Unified Analysis, ed. J Collier, SJ Yanagisako, pp. 14-52. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
25. Conkey MW. 2003. Has feminism changed archaeology? Signs 28(3):867-80
26. Conkey MW. 2005. Dwellingatthe margins, actionatthe intersection? Feministand indigenous archaeologies. Archaeologies 1(1):9-80
27. Conkey MW. 2007a. Questioning theory: Is there a gender of theory in archaeology? J. Archaeol. Method Theory 14(3):285-310
28. Conkey MW. 2007b. Personal histories retrospect. Seminar at the Univ. Cambridge, organized by PJ Smith, 22 Oct. http://www.arch.cam.ac.uk/podcast/ personal-histories-retrospect-2007.mp3
29. Conkey MW, Gero JM. 1997. Programme to practice: gender and feminism in archaeology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 26:411-37
30. Conkey MW, Spector JD. 1984. Archaeology and the study of gender. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 7, ed. MB Schiffer, pp. 1-39. New York: Academic
31. Connell RW. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
32. Dahlberg F, ed. 1981. Woman the Gatherer. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
33. Davis AY. 1981. Women, Race, and Class. New York: Random House
34. Dean C. 2001. Andean androgyny and the making of men. In Gender in Pre-Hispanic America, ed. CF Klein, pp. 143-82. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks
35. De Lauretis T. 1991. Queer theory: lesbian and gay sexualities. Differences 3(2):iii-xviii
36. Delle JA, Mrozowski SA, Paynter R, ed. 2000. Lines that Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class and Gender. Knoxville: Univ. Tenn. Press
37. Dowson T, ed. 2000. Special issue, Queer Archaeologies. World Archaeol. 32(2)
38. Dowson T. 2006. Archaeologists, feminists, and queers: sexual politics in the construction of the past. See Geller & Stockett 2006b, pp. 89-102
39. Elston RG, Zeanah DW. 2002. Thinking outside the box: a new perspective on diet breadth and sexual division of labor in the Prearchaic Great Basin. World Archaeol. 34(1):103-30
40. Engelstad E. 2007. Much more than gender. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 14(3):217-34
41. Eshed V, Gopher A, Galili E, Hershkovitz I.2004. Musculoskeletal stress markers in Natufian hunter-gatherers and Neolithic farmers in the Levant: the upper limb. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 123(4):303-15
42. Flannery KV. 2006. On the resilience of anthropological archaeology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 35:1-13
43. Foucault M. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1. New York: Vintage
44. Franklin M. 1997. Why are there so few black American archeologists. Antiquity 71(274):799-801
45. Franklin M. 2001. A black feminist-inspired archaeology? J. Soc. Archaeol. 1:108-25
46. Galle JE, Young AL, eds. 2004. Engendering African American Archaeology: A Southern Perspective. Knoxville: Univ. Tenn. Press
47. Geller PL. 2004. Transforming bodies, transforming identities: a consideration of pre-Columbian Maya corporeal beliefs and practices. PhD thesis. Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. 606 pp.
48. Geller PL. 2005. Skeletal analysis and theoretical complications. World Archaeol. 37(4):597-609
49. Geller PL. 2008. Conceiving sex: fomenting a feminist bioarchaeology. J. Soc. Archaeol. 8(1):113-38
50. Geller PL. 2009. Biology, bodyscapes, and heteronormativity. Am. Anthropol. 111(4):In press
51. Geller PL, Stockett MK. 2006a. Beyond the academy: feminist anthropology, archaeology, and political debates about abortion. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Anthropol. Assoc., 105th, San Jose
52. Geller PL, Stockett MK, eds. 2006b. Feminist Anthropology: Past, Present, and Future. Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
53. Gero JM. 1985. Sociopolitics of archaeology and the woman-at-home ideology. Am. Antiquity 50:342-50
54. Gero JM. 1993. The social world of prehistoric facts: gender and power in Paleoindian research. In Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, Res. Sch. Pac. Stud., Occas. Pap. Prehistory, No. 23, ed. H du Cros, L Smith, pp. 31-40. Canberra: Aust. Natl. Univ.
55. Gero JM. 2004. Sex pots of ancient Peru: post-gender reflections. In Combining the Past and the Present: Archaeological Perspectives on Society, ed. T Oestigaard, N Anfinset, T Saetersdal, pp. 3-22. Oxford: BAR Int. Ser. 1210 pp.
56. Gero JM, Conkey MW, eds. 1991. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
57. Gero JM, Scattolin MC. 2002. Beyond complementarity and hierarchy: new definitions for archaeological gender relations. In Pursuit of Gender: Worldwide Archaeological Approaches, ed. SM Nelson, M Rosen-Ayalon, pp. 155-72. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
58. Gifford-Gonzalez D. 1993. You can hide, but you can't run: representation of women's work in illustrations of palaeolithic life. Vis. Anthropol. Rev. 9:3-21
59. Gilchrist R. 2000. Unsexing the body: the interior sexuality of medieval religious women. See Schmidt & Voss 2000, pp. 89-103
60. Gutmann MC. 1997. Trafficking in men: the anthropology of masculinity. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 26:385-409
61. Hamilton S. 2007. Women in practice: women in British contract field archaeology. See Hamilton et al. 2007a, pp. 121-46
62. Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Wright KI, eds. 2007a. Archaeology and Women: Ancient and Modern. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
63. Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Wright KI. 2007b. Introduction. See Hamilton et al. 2007a, pp. 13-24
64. Hanen MP, Kelley J. 1992. Gender and archaeological knowledge. In Metaarchaeology: Reflections by Archaeologists and Philosophers, ed. L Embree, pp. 195-227. Boston: Kluwer
65. Hanks B. 2008. Reconsidering warfare, status, and gender in the Eurasian Steppe Iron Age. In Are All Warriors Male? Gender Roles on the Ancient Eurasian Steppe, ed. KM Linduff, KS Rubinson, pp. 15-34. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
66. Haraway D. 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism as a site of discourse in the privilege of partial perspective. Fem. Stud. 14:575-600
67. Harding S. 1987. Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In Feminism and Methodology, ed. S Harding, pp. 1-14. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
68. Hays-Gilpin K. 2000. Feminist scholarship in archaeology. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 571:89-106
69. Hekman S. 1990. Gender and Knowledge: Elements of a Postmodern Feminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity
70. Hendon J. 2006. Feminist perspectives and the teaching of archaeology: implications from the inadvertent ethnography of the classroom. See Geller & Stockett 2006b, pp. 129-42
71. Hildebrandt W, McGuire K. 2002. The ascendance of hunting during the California Middle Archaic: an evolutionary perspective. Am. Antiquity 67(2):231-56
72. Hollimon S. 1997. The third gender in native California: two-spirit undertakers among the Chumash and their neighbors. In Women in Prehistory, ed. C Claassen, RA Joyce, pp. 173-88. Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
73. Hollimon S. 2000. Archaeology of the 'aqi': gender and sexuality in prehistoric Chumash society. See Schmidt & Voss 2000, pp. 179-96
74. Hollimon S. 2001. The gendered peopling of America: addressing the antiquity of systems of multiple genders. In The Archaeology of Shamanism, ed. N Price, pp. 123-34. London: Routledge
75. Hollimon S. 2006. The archaeology of nonbinary genders in Native North American societies. See Nelson 2006, pp. 435-50
76. hooks b. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge
77. Jagose A. 1996. Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York Univ. Press
78. Jarvenpa R, Brumbach HJ. 2006. Revisiting the sexual division of labor: thoughts on ethnoarchaeology and gender. In Integrating the Diversity of Twenty-First-Century Anthropology: The Life and Intellectual Legacies of Susan Kent, Archeol. Pap. Am. Anthropol. Assoc., No. 16, ed. W Ashmore, M Dobres, S Nelson, A Rosen, pp. 97-107. Arlington, VA: Am. Anthropol. Assoc.
79. Joyce RA. 2000a. Girling the girl and boying the boy: the production of adulthood in ancient Mesoamerica. World Archaeol. 31(1):473-83
80. Joyce RA. 2000b. A PreColumbian gaze: male sexuality among the ancient Maya. See Schmidt & Voss 2000, pp. 263-83
81. Joyce RA. 2005. Archaeology of the body. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 34:139-58
82. Joyce RA. 2008. Ancient Bodies, Ancient Lives. New York: Thames & Hudson
83. Joyce RA, Tringham RE. 2007. Feminist adventures in hypertext. See Wylie & Conkey 2007, pp. 328-58
84. Kinser AE. 2004. Negotiating spaces for/through third-wave feminism. NWSA J. 16(3):124-53
85. Knapp AB. 1998. Boys will be boys: masculinist approaches to a gendered archaeology. In Reader in Gender Archaeology, ed. K Hays-Gilpin, DS Whitley, pp. 365-73. London: Routledge
86. Kreps B. 1972. Radical feminism 1. In Women Unite!: An Anthology of the Canadian Women's Movement, pp. 71-75. Toronto: Can. Women's Educ. Press
87. Kuhn SL, Stiner MC. 2006. What's a mother to do? The division of labor among Neandertals and modern humans in Eurasia. Curr. Anthropol. 47(6):953-80
88. Lambert PM. 2001. Auditory exostoses: a clue to gender in prehistoric and historic farming communities of North Carolina and Virginia. In Archaeological Studies of Gender in the Southeastern United States, ed. JM Eastman, CB Rodning, pp. 152-72. Gainseville: Univ. Press Fla.
89. Lather P. 2007. Getting Lost: Feminist Efforts toward a Double(d) Science. Albany: SUNY Press
90. Lazzari M. 2003. Archaeological visions: gender, landscape and optic knowledge. World Archaeol. 3(2):194-222
91. Lewin E, Leap WL, eds. 2002. Out in Theory: the Emergence of Lesbian and Gay Anthropology. Chicago: Univ. Ill. Press
92. Lorentz K. 2008. From life course to longue duré e: headshaping as gendered capital? See Bolger 2008, pp. 281-311
93. MacKinnon CA. 1991. From practice to theory, or, what is a white woman anyway? Yale J. L. Feminism 4(2):13-22
94. Maggiano IS, Schultz M, Kierdorf H, Sierra Sosa T, Maggiano CM, Tiesler Blos V. 2008. Cross-sectional analysis of long bones, occupational activities and long-distance trade of the Classic Maya from Xcambó-archaeological and osteological evidence. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 136(4):170-77
95. Marchi DO, Sparacello VS, Holt BM, Formicola V. 2006. Biomechanical approach to the reconstruction of activity patterns in Neolithic western Liguria, Italy. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 131:447-55
96. Meskell LM. 2000. Cycles of life and death: narrative homology and archaeological realities. World Archaeol. 31(3):423-41
97. Meskell LM. 2002. The intersections of identity and politics in archaeology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 31:279-301
98. Mohanty CT. 1984. Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. boundary212(3):333-58
99. Molleson T. 2007. Bones of work at the origins of labor. See Hamilton et al. 2007a, pp. 185-98
100. Moore H. 1988. Feminism and Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Polity
101. Moraga C, Anzalduá G, eds. 1981. This Bridge Called my Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. Watertown, MA: Persephone
102. Moser S. 2007. On disciplinary culture: archaeology as fieldwork and its gendered associations. See Wylie & Conkey 2007, pp. 235-63
103. Nelson MC, Nelson SM, Wylie A, eds. 1994.Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology. Washington, DC: Archaeol. Pap. Am. Anthropol. Assoc.
104. Nelson SM, ed. 2006. Handbook of Gender in Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
105. Nicholson L, ed. 1990. Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge
106. Norder J, Rizvi UZ. 2008. Reassessing the present for an archaeology of the future: equity, diversity, and change. SAA Archaeol. Rec. 8(4):12-14
107. Novak S. 2006. Beneath the façade: a skeletal model of domestic violence. In The Social Archaeology of Funerary Remains, ed. C Knü sel, R Gowland, pp. 238-52. Oxford: Oxbow Books
108. Ortner S. 1974. Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Woman, Culture, and Society, ed. MZ Rosaldo, L Lamphere, pp. 67-88. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
109. Ortner S. 1996. Making Gender: The Politics and Erotics of Culture. Boston: Beacon
110. Owen LR. 2005. Distorting the Past: Gender and the Division of Labor in the European Upper Paleolithic. Tub̈ingen: Kerns Verlag
111. Patterson TC, Geller PL, Boites SZ. 2004. The growth and changing composition of anthropology: 1966-2002. http://www.aaanet.org/ar/ ChangingComposition.pdf
112. Perry EM. 2004. Bioarchaeology of labor and gender in the prehispanic American Southwest. PhD thesis. Univ. Ariz., Tucson. 442 pp.
113. Perry EM, Joyce RA. 2001. Providing a past for Bodies that Matter: Judith Butler's impact on the archaeology of gender. Int. J. Sex. Gend. Stud. 6(1/2):63-76
114. Peterson J. 2002. Sexual Revolutions: Gender and Labor at the Dawn of Agriculture. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
115. Pyburn KA. 2004. Introduction: rethinking complex societies. In Ungendering Civilization, ed. KA Pyburn, pp. 1-46. New York: Routledge
116. Raddeker HB. 2007. Sceptical History: Feminist and Postmodern Approaches in Practice. New York: Routledge
117. Reeder G. 2000. Same-sex desire, conjugal constructs, and the tomb of Niankhkhnum and Khnumhotep. See Dowson 2000, pp. 193-208
118. Rich A. 1980. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs 5(4):631-60
119. Robin C. 2006. Gender, farming, and long-term change: Maya historical and archaeological perspectives. Curr. Anthropol. 47(3):409-33
120. Robin C, Brumfiel EM, eds. 2008. Gender, Households, and Society: Unraveling the Threads of the Past and the Present, Archeol. Pap. Am. Anthropol. Assoc., No. 18. Malden, MA: Blackwell
121. Rotman DL. 2006. Separate spheres? Beyond the dichotomies of domesticity. Curr. Anthropol. 47(4):666-74
122. Rubin G. 1984. Thinking sex: notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, ed. C Vance, pp. 287-319. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul
123. Rubin G. 2002. Studying sexual subcultures: excavating the ethnography of gay communities in urban North America. See Lewin & Leap 2002, pp. 17-68
124. Schmidt RA. 2002. The Iceman cometh: queering the archaeological past. See Lewin & Leap 2002, pp. 155-85
125. Schmidt RA, Voss BL, eds. 2000. Archaeologies of Sexuality. New York: Routledge
126. Scott E. 2001. The use and misuse of rape in prehistory. See Bevan 2001, pp. 1-18
127. Scott JW. 1996. After history? Common Knowl. 5(3):9-26
128. Sedgwick EK. 1990. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
129. Seifert DJ, O'Brien EB, Balicki J. 2000. Mary Ann Hall's first-class house: the archaeology of a capital brothel. See Schmidt & Voss 2000, pp. 117-28
130. Sladeḱ V, Berner M, Sosna D, Sailer R. 2007. Human manipulative behavior in the central European Late Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age: humeral bilateral asymmetry. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 133:669-81
131. Slocum S. 1975. Woman the gatherer: male bias in anthropology. In Toward an Anthropology of Women, ed. RR Reiter, pp. 36-50. New York: Monthly Rev. Press
132. Sofaer JR. 2006. The Body as Material Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
133. Somerville S. 1997. Scientific racism and the inventionofthe homosexual body. In The Gender/Sexuality Reader: Culture, History, Political Economy, ed. RN Lancaster, M di Leonardo, pp. 37-52. New York: Routledge
134. Sørensen MLS. 2000. Gender Archaeology. Cambridge, UK: Polity
135. Spector JD. 1993. What this Awl Means: Feminist Archaeology at a Wahpeton Dakota Village. St. Paul: Minn. Hist. Soc. Press
136. Spector JD. 2007. Feminist archaeology: what this all means (after all these years). In Feminist Waves, Feminist Generations, ed. H Aikau, K Erickson, J Pierce, pp. 46-66. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
137. Spivak GC. 1985. Three women's texts and a critique of imperialism. Crit. Inq. 12(1):243-61
138. Stockett MK. 2005. On the importance of difference: re-envisioning sex and gender in ancient Mesoamerica. World Archaeol. 37(4):566-78
139. Sullivan N. 2003. A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. New York: NY Univ. Press
140. Surovell TA. 2000. Early Paleoindian women, children, mobility, and fertility. Am. Antiquity 65(3):493-508
141. Tringham RE. 1991. Household with faces: the challenge of gender in prehistoric architectural remains. See Gero & Conkey 1991, pp. 93-131
142. Tringham RE. 1994. Engendered places in prehistory. Gender Place Cult. 1(2):169-203
143. Valian V. 1998. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
144. Voss BL. 2008a. Gender, race, and labor in the archaeology of the Spanish Colonial Americas. Curr. Anthropol. 49(5):861-93
145. Voss BL. 2008b. Sexuality studies in archaeology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 37:317-36
146. Waguespack NM. 2005. The organization of male and female labor in foraging societies: implications for early Paleoindian archaeology. Am. Anthropol. 107(4):666-76
147. Walde D, Willows ND, eds. 1991. The Archaeology of Gender: Proc. 22nd Annu. Chacmool Conf. Calgary: Univ. Calgary Archaeol. Assoc.
148. Walker PL, Cook DC. 1998. Brief communication: gender and sex: vive la difference. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 106:255-59
149. Wasson C, Brondo K, LeMaster B, Turner T, Cudhea M, et al. 2008. We've Come a Long Way, Maybe: Academic Climate Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in Anthropology. Washington, DC: Am. Anthropol. Assoc.
150. West MS, Curtis JW. 2006. AAUP Faculty Gender Equity Indicators 2006. Washington, DC: Am. Assoc. Univ. Profr.
151. Whitehouse RD. 2007. Gender archaeology and archaeology of women: Do we need both? See Hamilton et al. 2007a, pp. 27-40
152. Wilkie LA. 2003. The Archaeology of Mothering: An African-American Midwife's Tale. New York: Routledge
153. Wright RP. 2008. Gendered relations and the Ur III dynasty: kinship, property, and labor. See Bolger 2008, pp. 247-79
154. Wylie A. 1992. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests. Am. Antiquity 57:15-35
155. Wylie A. 2002. The constitution of archaeological evidence: gender politics and science. In Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology, pp. 185-99. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
156. Wylie A. 2007. Doing archaeology as a feminist: introduction. See Wylie & Conkey 2007, pp. 209-16
157. Wylie A, Conkey MW, eds. 2007. Special issue, Doing Archaeology as a Feminist. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 14(3)
158. Yamin R. 2005. Wealthy, free, and female: prostitution in nineteenth-century New York. Hist. Archaeol. 25(4):132-55
159. Yates T. 1993. Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. In Interpretive Archaeology, ed. C Tilley, pp. 31-72. Oxford: Berg