Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volumn 26, Issue , 1997, Pages 411-437

  Conkey, Margaret W ^a   Gero, Joan M ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000472862     PISSN: 00846570     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411     Document Type: Article

References (210)

1. Allen H. 1996. Ethnography and prehistoric archaeology in Australia. J. Anthropol. Archeol. 15:137-59
2. Archer L, Fischler S, Wyke M. 1994. Women in Ancient Societies: An Illusion in the Night. London: Macmillan
3. Arsenault D. 1991. The representation of women in Moche iconography. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp 313-26
4. Bacus E, Barker AW, Bonevich JD, Dunavan SL, Fitzhugh JB, et al, eds. 1993. A Gendered Past: A Critical Bibliography of Gender in Archaeology. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Mich. Mus. Anthropol.
5. Bailey DW. 1994a. The representation of gender: homology or propaganda. J. Eur. Archeol. 2:189-202
6. Bailey DW. 1994b. Reading prehistoric figurines as individuals. World Archeol. 25: 321-31
7. Balme J, Beck W, eds. 1995. Gendered Archaeology: The Second Australian Women in Archaeology Conference. Canberra: Aust. Natl. Univ.
8. Bender B. 1997. Introduction. In Gender and Material Culture: Representations of Gender from Prehistory to the Present. London" Macmillan
9. Bender S. 1991. Towards a history of women in northeastern U. S. archaeology. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 211-16
10. Bender S. 1992. Marian E. White: pioneer in New York archaeology. Bull. NY State Archeol. Assoc. 104:14-20
11. Benedict JW. 1993. Excavations at Bode's Draw: A Women's Work Area in the Mountains Near Estes Park, Colorado. Ward, CO: Cent. Mt. Archaeol.
12. Bergman J. 1995. The persistence of kinship: recent contributions to feminist anthropology. Anthropol. Q. 68:234-40
13. Billington S, Green M. 1996. The Concept of the Goddess. London: Routledge
14. Bishop R, Lanae F. 1991. The Ceramic Legacy of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, CO: Univ. Press Colo.
15. Boardman J. 1991. Naked truth. Oxford J. Archeol. 10:119-21
16. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
17. Brumfiel E. 1991. Weaving and cooking: women's production in Aztec Mexico. See Gero & Conkey 1991, pp. 224-51
18. Brumfiel E. 1992. Breaking and entering the ecosystem: gender, class, and faction steal the show. Am. Anthropol. 94(3):551-67
19. Brumfiel E. 1993. Review of "Ideology and Pre-Columbian Civilization," ed. A Demarest, G Conrad. J. Anthropol. Res. 49: 412-14
20. Brumfiel E. 1996. Figurines and the Aztec state: testing the effectiveness of ideological domination. See Wright 1996, pp. 143-66
21. Butler J. 1988. Performative acts and gender constitution: an essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre J. 40:519-30
22. Butler J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge
23. Butler J. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". New York/London: Routledge
24. Carman CJ. 1991. Sweatlodge participation among Nez Perce women. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 159-64
25. Chilton E. 1992. Archaeological investigations at the Goat Island rockshelter: new light from old legacies. Hudson Valley Reg. Rev. 9:47-75
26. Chilton E. 1994. In search of paleo-women: gender implications of remains from Paleoindian sites in the Northeast. Bull. Mass. Archeol. Soc. 55:8-14
27. Claassen C, ed. 1992. Exploring Gender Through Archaeology. Madison, WI: Prehistory Press
28. Claassen C. 1993. Black and white women at Irene Mound. South. Archeol. 12:137-47
29. Claassen C, ed. 1994. Women in Archaeology. Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
30. Claassen C, Joyce R, eds. 1997. Women in Prehistory. North America and Mesoamerica. Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
31. Code L. 1991. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
32. Collins PH. 1989. The social construction of Black feminist thought. SIGNS: J. Women Cult. Soc. 14:745-73
33. Collins PH. 1994. Keep your mind on the prize: a review of "Theorizing Black Feminisms: The Visionary Pragamatism of Black Women," ed. SM James, APA Busia. Women's Rev. Books 12:32
34. Conkey M, Tringham R. 1995. Archaeology and the goddess: exploring the contours of feminist archaeology. See Stanton & Stewart 1995, pp. 199-247
35. Conkey M, Williams S. 1991. Original narratives: the political economy of gender in archaeology. See di Leonardo 1991a, pp. 102-39
36. Conroy LP. 1993. Female figurines of the Upper Paleolithic and the emergence of gender. See du Cros & Smith 1993, pp. 153-60
37. Cordell L. 1991. Sisters of sun and spade, women archaeologists in the Southwest. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 502-9
38. Costin CL. 1993. Textiles, women and political economy in late prehispanic Peru. Res. Econ. Anthropol. 14:3-28
39. Costin CL. 1996. Exploring the relationship between gender and craft in complex societies: methodological and theoretical issues of gender attribution. See Wright 1996, pp. 111-42
40. Crabtree P. 1991. Gender hierarchies and the division of labor in the Natufian culture of the southern Levant. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 384-91
41. Daston L. 1991. Marvelous facts and miraculous evidence in early modern Europe. Crit. Ing. 18:93-124
42. Daston L, Galison P. 1992. The image of objectivity. Representations 40:81-128
43. del Valle T, ed. 1993a. Gendered Anthropology: London/New York: Routledge
44. del Valle T. 1993b. Introduction. See del Valle 1993a, pp. 1-16
45. Dent RJ. 1991. Deep time in the Potomac River Valley: thoughts in Paleoindian life-ways and revisionist archaeology. Archeol. East. North Am. 19:23-41
46. di Leonardo M, ed. 1991a. Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Post-Modern Era. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
47. di Leonardo M. 1991b. Introduction: gender, culture and political economy, feminist anthropology in historical perspective. See di Leonardo 1991a, pp. 1-48
48. di Leonardo M. 1993. What a difference political economy makes: feminist anthropology in the postmodern era. Anthropol. Q. 66:76-80
49. Dobres M-A. 1992. Reconsidering Venus figurines: a feminist inspired re-analysis. In The Archaeology of Ideology, ed. AS Goldsmith, S Garvie, D Selin, J Smith, pp. 245-62. Calgary: Archeol. Assoc. Univ. Calgary
50. Dobres M-A. 1995a. Gender in the Making: Late Magdalenian Social Relations of Production in the French Midi-Pyrénées. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., Berkeley
51. Dobres M-A. 1995b. Gender and prehistoric technology: on the social agency of technical strategies. World Archeol. 27:25-49
52. Dobres M-A. 1995c. Beyond gender attribution: some methodological issues for engendering the past. See Balme & Beck 1995, pp. 51-66
53. Dobres M-A, Hoffman C. 1994. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 1: 211-58
54. Dommasnes LH. 1992. Two decades of women in prehistory and in archaeology in Norway. A review. Nor. Archeol. Rev. 25: 1-14
55. du Cros H, Smith L, eds. 1993. Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique. Canberra: Aust. Natl. Univ.
56. Duke P. 1991. Recognizing gender in Plains hunting groups: Is it possible or even necessary? See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 280-83
57. Ehrenberg M. 1989. Women in Prehistory. Oklahoma City, OK: Univ. Okla. Press
58. Engelstad E. 1991. Images of power and contradiction: feminist theory and post-processual archaeology. Antiquity 65: 502-14
59. Engelstad E, ed. 1992. Nor. Archaeol. Rev. 25(1):1-72
60. Engelstad E, Mandt G, Naess J-R. 1994. Equity issues in Norwegian archaeology. See Nelson et al 1994, pp. 139-46
61. Epstein CF. 1988. Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender and the Social Order. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
62. Fantham E, Foley HP, Kampen NB, Pomeroy S, Shapiro HA. 1994. Women in the Classical World: Image and Text. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
63. Flax J. 1990. Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West. Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
64. Ford A, Hundt A. 1994 Equity in academia - why the best men still win: an examination of women and men in Mesoamerican archaeology. See Nelson et al 1994, pp. 147-56
65. Fotiadis M. 1993. Regions of the imagination: archaeologists, local people and the archaeological record in fieldwork, Greece. J. Eur. Archeol. 1:151-70
66. Fotiadis M. 1994. What is archaeology's "mitigated objectivism" mitigated by? Comments on Wylie. Am. Antiq. 59(3): 545-55
67. Gailey C. 1987. From Kinship to Kingship: Gender Hierarchy and State Formation in the Tongan Islands. Austin, TX: Univ. Tex. Press
68. Gathercole P, Lowenthal D, eds. 1990. The Politics of the Past. London/Boston: Unwin Hyman
69. Gero J. 1993. The social world of prehistoric facts: gender and power in Paleoindian research. See du Cros & Smith 1993, pp. 31-40
70. Gero J. 1996. Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data. See Wright 1996, pp. 251-80
71. Gero J. 1997. La iconografia Recuay y el estudio de genero. Gaceta Andina 25/26:In press
72. Gero J, Conkey M, eds. 1991. Engendering Archaeology. Women and Prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell
73. Gero J, Lacey D, Blakey M, eds. 1983. The Socio-Politics of Archaeology. Res. Rep. No. 23, Amherst: Univ. Mass.
74. Giddens A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
75. Gifford-Gonzalez D. 1992. Gaps in zooarchaeological analyses of butchery: Is gender an issue? In Bones to Behavior, ed. J Hudson, pp. 181-99 Carbondale: So. Ill. Univ. Cent. Archeol. Invest.
76. Gifford-Gonzalez D. 1993. You can hide, but you can't run: representations of women's work in illustrations of Paleolithic life. Visual Anthropol. Rev. 9:3-21
77. Gilchrist R. 1991. Women's archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision. Antiquity 65:459-501
78. Gimbutas M. 1989. The Language of the Goddess. San Francisco: Harper & Row
79. Golub S. 1992. Periods: From Menarche to Menopause. London: Sage
80. Guillen AC. 1993. Women, rituals and social dynamics at ancient Chalcatzingo. Lat. Am. Antiq. 4:209-24
81. Hamilton N, Marcus J, Bailey D, Haaland G, Haaland R, Ucko P. 1996. Viewpoint. Can we interpret figurines? Cambridge Archeol. J. 6:281-307
82. Handsman R. 1991. Whose art was found at Lepenski Vir? Gender relations and power in archaeology. See Gero & Conkey 1991, pp. 329-65
83. Hanen M, Kelley J. 1992. Gender and archaeological knowledge. In Meta Archaeology: ed. L Embree, pp. 195-225. Netherlands: Kluwer
84. Haraway D. 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism as a site of discourse in the privilege of partial perspective. Fem. Stud. 14:575-600
85. Hasbrouck J. 1996. Gay liberation or gay colonization? Issues and suggestions for the global lesbian, gay and bisexual movement. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Anthropol. Assoc., 95th. San Francisco
86. Hastorf C. 1991. Gender, space, and food in prehistory. See Gero & Conkey 1991, pp. 132-59
87. Hayden B. 1992. Observing prehistoric women. See Claassen 1992, pp. 33-48
88. Hendon JA. 1996. Archaeological approaches to the organization of domestic labor: household practice and domestic relations. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 25:45-61
89. Hingley R. 1991. Domestic organization and gender relations in Iron Age and Romano-British households. In The Social Archaeology of Houses, ed. R Samson, pp. 125-48. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press
90. Hollimon SE. 1991. Health consequences of the division of labor among the Chumash Indians of southern California. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 462-69
91. Hollimon SE. 1992. Health consequences of the division of labor among prehistoric native Americans: the chumash of southern California and the Arikara of the North Plains. See Claassen 1992, pp. 81-88
92. hooks b. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press
93. Irigaray L. 1985. (1974). Speculum of the Other Woman. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
94. Jay N. 1991. Gender and dichotomy: male theories of power. In A Reader in Feminist Knowledge, ed. S Gunew, pp. 89-106. New York: Routledge
95. Jordanova LJ. 1980. Natural facts: a historical perspective on science and sexuality. In Nature, Culture, and Gender, ed. C MacCormack, M Strathern, pp. 42-69. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
96. Joyce RA. 1993a. Embodying Personhood in Prehispanic Costa Rica. Wellesley, MA: Davis Mus. Cult. Cent., Wellesley Coll.
97. Joyce RA. 1993b. Women's work: images of production and reproduction in pre-Hispanic southern Central America. Curr. Anthropol. 34:255-74
98. Joyce RA. 1996. Performance and inscription: negotiating sex and gender in Classic Maya society. Presented at Pre-Columb. Stud. Symp., Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC
99. Joyce RA. 1997. Performing gender in pre-Hispanic Central America: ornamentation, representation and the construction of the body. RES: Anthropol. Aesthet. In press
100. K. A. N. 1985-. Kvinner i arkeologi i Norge (Women in Archaeology in Norway). Tromsø: Univ. Norway Tromsø
101. Kampen NB. 1995. Looking at gender: the column of Trajan and Roman historical relief. See Stanton & Stewart 1995, pp. 46-73
102. Kastner S, Karlisch SM, eds. 1991. Reader zum Symposium: Feminismus und Archäologie?! Tübingen, Ger: Inst. Frühgesch.
103. Kehoe A. 1991. No possible, probable shadow of doubt. Antiquity 65:129-31
104. Kehoe A. 1992. The muted class: unshackling tradition. See Claassen 1992, pp. 23-32
105. Keller EF. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism. New York: Freeman
106. Keller EF. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
107. Kent S. 1995. Does sedentarization promote gender inequality? A case study from the Kalahari. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 1:513-36
108. Kessler S, McKenna W. 1985. (1978). Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
109. Knight C. 1991. Blood Relations: Menstruation and the Origins of Culture. London: Yale Univ. Press
110. Kus S. 1992. Toward an archaeology of body and soul. In Representations in Archaeology, ed. JC Gardin, C Peebles, pp. 168-77. Bloomington: Ind. Univ. Press
111. Laqueur T. 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
112. Larick R. 1991. Warriors and blacksmiths: mediating ethnicity in East African spears. J. Anthropol. Archeol. 10:299-331
113. Lawrence-Cheney S. 1991. Women and alcohol: female influence on recreational patterns in the West, 1880-1890. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 479-89
114. Lawrence-Cheney S. 1993. Gender on colonial peripheries. See du Cros & Smith 1993, pp. 134-37
115. Leacock E. 1981. History, development, and the division of labor by sex: implications for organization. Signs: J. Women Cult. Soc. 7:474-91
116. Leone MP. 1973. Archaeology as the science of technology: Mormon town plans and fences. In Research and Theory in Contemporary Archaeology, ed. CL Redman, pp. 125-50. New York: Wiley
117. Leone MP. 1982. Some opinions about recovering mind. Am. Antiq. 47:742-60
118. Leone MP. 1986. Symbolic, structural and critical archaeology. In American Archaeology, Past and Future, ed. D Meltzer, J Sabloff, D Fowler, pp. 415-38. Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. Press
119. Lesure R. 1997. Figurines and social identities in early sedentary societies of coastal Chiapas, Mexico, 1550-800 b. c. See Claassen & Joyce 1997, pp. 227-48
120. Levine MA. 1991. An historical overview of research on women in archaeology. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 177-86
121. Levy J. 1995. Gender, power and heterarchy in middle-level societies. Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Am. Archeol., 60th., Minneapolis
122. Linke U. 1992. Manhood, femaleness and power: a cultural analysis of prehistoric images. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 34: 579-620
123. Little B. 1994. Consider the hermaphroditic mind: comment on "the interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: recent archaeological research on gender." Am. Antiq. 59(3):539-44
124. Longino H. 1987. Can there be a feminist science? Hypatia 2:51-64
125. Longino H. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
126. Longino H. 1993. Essential tensions - phase two: feminist, philosophical and social studies of science. In A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, ed. L Antony, C Witt, pp. 257-72. Boulder, CO: Westview
127. Longino H. 1994. In search of feminist epistemology. Monist 77:472-85
128. Lorber J. 1994. Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
129. M. T. 1993. Challenging assumptions: Lorraine Daston. Univ. Chicago Mag Apr: 34-35
130. Marcus M. 1994. Dressed to kill: women and pins in early Iran. Oxford Art J. 17:3-15
131. Mazel A. 1992. Gender and the hunter-gatherer archaeological record: a view from the Thukela Basin. South Afr. Archeol. Bull. 47:122-26
132. McBryde I. 1996. Past and present indivisible? In From Prehistory to Politics: John Muvaney and the Making of a Public Intellectual, ed. T Bonyhady, T Griffiths, pp. 64-84. Melbourne: University Press
133. McCafferty SD, McCafferty GG. 1991. Spinning and weaving as female gender identity in post-Classic Mexico. In Textile Traditions of Mesoamerica and the Andes, ed. M Schevill, JC Berlo, E Dwyer, 2:19-44. Hamden, CT: Garland
134. McCafferty SD, McCafferty GG. 1994. Engendering Tomb 7 at Monte Alban: respinning an old yarn. Curr. Anthropol. 35: 143-66
135. McDonald J. 1992. The Great Mackerel rock-shelter excavation: women in the archaeological record. Aust. Archeol. 35:32-50
136. McGuire K. Hildebrandt WR. 1994. The possibilities of women and men: gender and the California milling stone horizon. J. Calif. Great Basin Anthropol. 16: 41-59
137. McGuire R, Paynter R. 1991. The Archaeology of Inequality. Oxford: Blackwell
138. Merchant C. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row
139. Meskell L. 1995. Goddesses, Gimbutas and 'New Age' archaeology. Antiquity 69: 74-86
140. Miller V, ed. 1988. The Role of Gender in Pre-Columbian Art and Architecture. Lanham, MD: Univ. Press Am.
141. Moore H. 1991. Epilogue. See Gero & Conkey 1991, pp. 407-11
142. Moore H. 1993. The differences within and the differences between. See del Valle 1993a, pp. 193-204
143. Moss M. 1993. Shellfish, gender and status on the Northwest coast: reconciling archaeological, ethnographic and ethnohistoric records of the Tlingit. Am. Anthropol. 95: 631-52
144. Moulton J. 1983. A paradigm of philosophy: the adversary method. In Discovering Reality, ed. S Harding, MB Hintikka, pp. 149-64. Dordrecht: Reidel
145. Muller F. 1991. 'Kulturelle Vielfalt': Das bild der frau in der Schweitz vor 2350 jahren. Archaol. Schweitz 14:115-23
146. Nelson M, Nelson S, Wylie A, eds. 1994. Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology. Archaeological Papers 5. Washington, DC: Am. Anthropol. Assoc.
147. Nelson S. 1991a. The 'Goddess Temple' and the status of women at Niuheliang, China. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 302-8
148. Nelson S. 1991b. Women archaeologists in Asia and the Pacific. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 217-19
149. Nelson S. 1992. Diversity of the Upper Paleolithic "Venus" figurines and archaeological mythology. In Gender in Cross-Cultural Perspective, ed. C Brettel, C Sargent, pp. 51-58. New York: Prentice Hall
150. Ortner S. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 26: 126-66
151. Øvrevik S. 1991. Sex ratios in archaeological organisations in Norway. Masters thesis. Univ. Bradford, UK
152. Parezo N, ed. 1993. Hidden Scholars: Women Anthropologists and the Native American Southwest. Albuquerque: Univ. N. M. Press
153. Patai D, Koertge N. 1994. Professing Feminism: Inside the Strange World of Women's Studies. New York: New Republic/Basic Books
154. Pinsky V, Wylie A, eds. 1989. Critical Traditions in Archaeology: Essays in the Philosophy, History and Sociopolitics of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
155. Pohl M. 1991. Women, animal rearing and social status: the case of the Formative period Maya of Central America. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 392-99
156. Pollock S. 1991. Women in a men's world: images of Sumerian women. See Gero & Conkey 1991, pp. 366-87
157. Pomeroy SB. 1975. Goddesses, Whores. Wives and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity. New York: Schocken Books
158. Pomeroy SB. 1991. Women's History and Ancient History. Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. N. C. Press
159. Preucel R, Joyce RA. 1994. Feminism, fieldwork, and the practice of archaeology. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Anthropol. Assoc., 93rd, Atlanta
160. Rabinowitz NS, Richlin A, eds. 1993. Feminist Theory and the Classics. New York/London: Routledge
161. Reyman J, ed. 1992. Rediscovering Our Past: Essays on the History of American Archaeology. Aldershot, UK: Avebury
162. Robb J. 1994. Gender contradictions, moral coalitions and inequality in prehistoric Italy. J. Eur. Archeol. 2:20-49
163. Roberts C. 1993. A critical approach to gender as a category of analysis in archaeology. See du Cros & Smith 1993, pp. 16-21
164. Rogers CL, Fowler DD. 1994. Feminist archaeology and cultural resource management. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Anthropol. Assoc., 93rd, Atlanta
165. Roseberry W. 1988. Political economy. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 17:161-85
166. Rossiter MW. 1982. Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press
167. Russell P. 1991. Men only? The myths about European Paleolithic artists. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 346-51
168. Sassaman KE. 1992. Lithic technology and the hunter-gatherer sexual division of labor North Am. Archeol. 13:249-62
169. Sassaman KE. 1997. Acquiring Stone, Acquiring Power. Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Am. Archeol. 62nd, Nashville, TN
170. Schrire C. 1995. Digging Through Darkness: Chronicles of an Archaeologist. Charlottesville: Univ. Va. Press
171. Scott EM. 1994. Those of Little Note: Gender, Race and Class in Historical Archaeology. Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
172. Seifert D, ed. 1991. Gender in historical archaeology. Hist. Archaeol. 25(4):1-155
173. Seifert D. 1994. Mrs. Starr's profession. In Those of Little Note: Gender, Race and Class in Historical Archaeology, ed. E Scott, pp. 149-74. Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
174. Silverblatt I. 1987. Moon, Sun and Witches: Gender Ideologies and Class in Inca and Colonial Peru. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
175. Silverblatt I. 1991. Interpreting women in states: new feminist ethnohistories. See di Leonardo 1991a, pp. 140-71
176. Smith L, du Cros H. 1995. Reflections on women in archaeology. See Balme & Beck 1995, pp. 7-27
177. Solomon A. 1992. Gender, representation and power in San art and ethnography. J. Anthropol. Archeol. 11:291-329
178. Sommers CH. 1994. Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women. New York: Simon & Schuster
179. Spector J. 1991. What this awl means. See Gero & Conkey 1991, pp 388-406
180. Spector J. 1993. What This Awl Means: Feminist Archaeology in a Wahpeton Dakota Village. Minneapolis: Minn. Hist. Soc.
181. Spencer-Wood S. 1991. Toward an historical archaeology of materialistic domestic reform. See McGuire & Paynter 1991, pp. 231-86
182. Spielman K. 1994. A feminist approach to archaeological field schools. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Anthopol. Assoc., 93rd, Atlanta
183. Spielman K. 1995. The Archaeology of gender in the American Southwest. J. Anthropol. Res. 51
184. Stacey J. 1988. Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women's Stud. Int. Forum 11: 22-27
185. Stanton D, Stewart A, eds. 1995. Feminisms in the Academy. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
186. Sternhill C. 1994. The proper study of womankind. Women's Rev. Books 12:1,3-4
187. Trigger B. 1980. Archaeology and the image of the American Indian. Am. Antiq. 45: 662-76
188. Trigger B. 1984. Alternative archaeologies: nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man 19:355-70
189. Trigger B. 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
190. Tringham R. 1991. Households with faces: the challenge of gender in prehistoric architectural remains. See Gero & Conkey 1991, pp. 93-131
191. Tringham R. 1994. Engendered places in prehistory. Gender Place Cult. Gender 1(2): 169-203
192. Wadley L. 1989. Gender relations in the Thukela Basin. South Afr. Archeol. Bull. 44:122-26
193. Walde D, Willows N, eds. 1991. The Archaeology of Gender. Calgary: Archeol. Assoc. Univ. Calgary
194. Wall D. 1994. The Archaeology of Gender: Separating the Spheres in Urban America. New York: Plenum
195. Walsh L, Burke T, Markos J, Hause L. 1994. Final Report: Archaeological Testing and Evaluations of Five Prehistoric Sites in Indian Wells Valley, Kern County, California for the Proposed Redrock 4-Lane Upgrade. Archeol. Res. Serv., Virginia City, NV
196. Watson PJ, Kennedy M. 1991. The development of horticulture in the Eastern Woodlands of North America: women's role. See Gero & Conkey 1991, pp. 255-75
197. West C, Zimmerman DH. 1987. Doing gender. Gender Soc. 1:125-52
198. Whelan M. 1991. Gender and archaeology: mortuary studies and the search for the origins of gender differentiation. See Walde & Willows 1991, pp. 358-65
199. Whelan M. 1995. Beyond hearth and home on the range: feminist approaches to Plains archaeology. In Beyond Subsistence: Plains Archaeology and the Postprocessual Critique, ed. P Duke, MC Wilson, pp. 46-65. Tuscaloosa, AL: Univ. Ala. Press
200. Woodbury N. 1992. In the shadow of man, or just the shade of the lab tent? SAA Bull. 9:6-7
201. Wright R. 1996. Gender and Archaeology. Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
202. Wylie A. 1992. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: recent archaeological research on gender. Am. Antiq. 57:15-35
203. Wylie A. 1994a. On "capturing facts alive in the past" (or present): response to Fotiadis and Little. Am. Antiq. 59(3):556-60
204. Wylie A. 1994b. Pragmatism and politics: understanding the emergence of gender research in archaeology: Presented as Skomp Disting. Lect. Anthropol., Indiana Univ., Bloomington
205. Wylie A. 1994c. Evidential constraints: pragmatic objectivism in archaeology. In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, ed. M Martin, L McIntyre, pp. 747-65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
206. Wylie A. 1995. Doing philosophy as a feminist: Longino on the search for a feminist epistemology. Philos. Top. 23(2):345-58
207. Wylie A. 1996. The constitution of archaeological evidence: gender politics and science. In The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, Power, ed. P Galison, DJ Stump, pp. 311-43. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
208. Wylie A. 1997. Good science, bad science or science as usual?: feminist critiques of science. In Women in Human Evolution, ed. LD Hager, pp. 29-55. New York/London: Routledge
209. Yentsch A. 1991. The symbolic divisions of pottery: sex-related attributes of English and Anglo-American household pots See McGuire & Paynter 1991, pp. 192-230
210. Zeanah D, Carter J, Dugas D, Elston R, Hammett J. 1995. An optimal foraging model of hunter-gatherer land use in the Carson Desert. Prepared for the US Fish Wildlife Serv./US Dep. Navy. Silver City, NV: Intermountain Res.