Feminist adventures in hypertext

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 328-358

  Joyce, Rosemary A ^a   Tringham, Ruth E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Feminist critique; Hypertext; Multimedia; Representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548478355     PISSN: 10725369     EISSN: 15737764     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-007-9036-2     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Addison, A. (2000). Emerging trends in virtual heritage. IEEE Multimedia, 7(2), 22-25.
2. AlSayyad, N. (1992). Modelling traditional Islamic cities. Heritage, 43, 26-33.
3. AlSayyad, N. (1999). Virtual Cairo: An urban historian's view of computer simulation. Leonardo, 32(2), 93-100.
4. Anderson, S. (2007). Past indiscretions: Digital archives and recombinant history. In M. Kinder & T. McPherson. (Eds.), Interactive frictions. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Retrieved from http://www.iml.annenberg.edu/instructors/sanderson/words/words.html (in press).
5. Arizpe, L. (1999). Freedom to create: Women's agenda for cyberspace. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), Women@lnternet: creating new cultures in cyberspace (pp. xii-xvi). London: Zed Books.
6. Audouze, F., & Buchsenschutz, O. (1992). Towns, villages and countryside of Celtic Europe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7. Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: BBC and Penguin Books.
8. Berger, J. (1980). About looking. London: Writers and Readers.
9. Bolter, J., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
10. Burnett, R., & Marshall, P. D. (2003). Web theory: An introduction. London: Routledge.
11. Carlson, D. E. A. (1998). Archaeologists in computerland. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, Public Education Committee.
12. Chippindale, C., & Champion, S. (1997). Special review section: Electronic archaeology. Antiquity, 71, 1027-1038.
13. Conkey, M. W., & Tringham, R. E. (1996). Cultivating thinking/challenging authority: Some experiments in feminist pedagogy in archaeology. In R. Wright (Ed.), Gender and Archaeology (pp. 224-225). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14. Connerton, P. (1991). In R. Get (Ed.), How societies remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Consalvo, M. (2002). Selling the internet to women: The early years. In M. Consalvo & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Women and everyday uses of the Internet: Agency and identity (pp. 111-138). New York: Peter Lang.
16. Crane, G. (1998). The Perseus project and beyond: How building a digital library challenges the humanities and technology. In D-Lib. Retrieved January 4, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january98/01crane.html.
17. Crumley, C. (1987). A dialectical critique of hierarchy. In T. Patterson & C. W. Gailey. Power relations and state formation (pp. 155-169). Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association, Archaeology Section.
18. Downes, S. (2003). Design and reusability of learning objects in an academic context: A new economy of education? USDLA. (US Distance Learning Association) Journal, 17(1).
19. Eiteljorg, H. II (2000). The compelling computer image - a doubled-edged sword. Internet Archaeology, 8. Retrieved. January 4, 2004, from http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue8/eiteljorg_toc.html.
20. Escobar, A. (1999). Gender, place and networks: A political ecology of cyberculture. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), Women@Internet: creating new cultures in Cyberspace (pp. 31-54). London: Zed Books.
21. Frischer, B. (2004). The digital roman forum project of the cultural virtual reality laboratory: Remediating the traditions of Roman topography. In 2nd Italy-United States workshop: The reconstruction of archaeological landscapes through digital technologies, Rome, Italy. Retrieved from http://www.cvrlab.org/research/images/FrischerWork.shopPaperIllustratedWeb.htm.
22. Gould, S. J. (October 1993). Dinosaur deconstruction: How we understand life's past is more a consequence of art than of science. New York, NY: Discover.
23. Guyer, C. (1992). Buzz-daze jazz and the quotidian stream.. In: Presented in the session "Hypertext, hypermedia: defining a fictional form" at the annual meeting of the Modern Language Association, New York.
24. Guyer, C. (1996a). Along the Estuary. In S. Birkerts (Ed.), Tolstoy's dictaphone: Technology and the muse. Graywolf Forum 1. St. Paul, MN: Graywolf Press.
25. Guyer, C. (1996b). Fretwork: ReForming me. Readerly/Writerly Texts, Spring.
26. Harcourt, W (1999a). Conclusion: Local/global encounters: WoN weaving together the virtual and actual. In W Harcourt (Ed.), Women@Internet: creating new cultures in cyberspace (pp. 219-225). London: Zed. Books.
27. Harcourt, W (Ed.) (1999b). Women@Internet: Creating new cultures in Cyberspace. London: Zed Books.
28. Hawthorne, S., & Klein, R. (Eds.) (1999). CyberFeminism: Connectivity, critique and creativity. Melbourne: Spinifex Press.
29. Hayles, N. K. (1995). Searching for common ground. In M. Soulé & G. Lease (Eds.), Reinventing nature? (pp. 47-64). Washington, DC: Island Press.
30. Hobley, B. (1982). Roman military structures at 'The Lunt' Roman fort: experimental simulations. In P. J. Drury (Ed.), Structural reconstruction: approaches to the interpretation of the excavated remains of buildings (pp. 223-273). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, no. 110.
31. Hodder, I. (1999). Archaeological process: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Hodder, I. (2006). The Leopard's tale: Revealing the Mysteries of Çatalhöyük. London, UK: Thames and Hudson.
33. Isomursu, M., Isomursu, P., Still, K., & Ijäs, J. (2003). Ponycom: The mobile future of a virtual community, hi: 2nd smart objects conference, Grenoble, France. Retrieved. July 21, 2007, from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/584385.html.
34. Joyce, M. (1995). Of two minds: Hypertext pedagogy and poetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
35. Joyce, M. (2000). One story: Present tense spaces of the heart. In Othermindedness: The emergence of network culture (pp. 123-130). Ann. Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36. Joyce, R. A. (2002). The languages of archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
37. Joyce, R. A., Guyer, C., & Joyce, M. (2000). Sister stories. New York: New York University Press. Retrieved January 4, 2004, from http://www.nyupress.org/sisterstories/index.html.
38. Kaplan, N., & Farrell, E. (1994). Weavers of webs: A portrait of young women on the net. The Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture, 2(3). Retrieved July 21, 2007, from http://iat.ubalt.edu/kaplan/weavers/weavers.html.
39. Kramarae, C. (Ed.) (1988). Technology and women's voices: Keeping in touch. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
40. Landow, G. (1992). Hypertext: the convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41. Landow, G. (1997). Hypertext 2.0: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
42. Lavine, S. D. (1991). Museum practices. In I. Karp & S. D. Lavine (Eds.), Exhibiting cultures: The poetics and politics of museum display (pp. 151-158). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
43. Lavine, S. D. (1992). Audience, ownership, and authority: Designing relations between museums and communities. In I. Karp, C. M. Kreamer, & S. D. Lavine (Eds.), Museums and communities: The politics of public culture (pp. 137-157). Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
44. Lopiparo, J., & Joyce, R. A. (2003). Crafting cosmos, telling sister stories, and exploring archaeological knowledge graphically in hypertext environments. In J. H. Jameson, Jr., C. Finn, & J. E. Ehrenhard (Eds.), Ancient muses: Archaeology and the arts (pp. 193-203). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
45. Nelson, T. (1981). Literary machines. Sausalito: Mindful Press.
46. Oksman, V. (2002). So I got it into my head that I should set up my own stable...: Creating virtual stables on the internet as girls' own computer culture. In M. Consalvo & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Women and everyday uses of the Internet: Agency and identity (pp. 211-229). New York: Peter Lang.
47. Perin, C. (1992). The communicative circle: Museums as communities. In I. Karp, C. M. Kreamer, & S. D. Lavine (Eds.), Museums and communities: The politics of public culture (pp. 182-220). Washington DC: Smithsonian. Institution Press.
48. Petrequin, A.-M., & Petrequin, P. (1988). Les Néolithique des lacs: préhistoire des lacs de Chalain et de Clairvaux (4000-2000 av. JC). Paris: Errance.
49. Richards, J. (2002). Digital preservation and access. European Journal of Archaeology, 5(3), 343-366.
50. Shade, L. (2002). Gender and community in the social construction of the internet. New York: Peter Lang.
51. Smith, B. C. (1994). A. case study of applied feminist theories. In J. R. Glaser & A. A. Zenetou (Eds.), Gender perspectives: Essays on women in museums (pp. 137-146). Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
52. Solman, G. (1993). 500 Nations: CGI's future helps revive Native America's past. Millimeter, 32-44 (July).
53. Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. New York: Delta Books.
54. Sorrell, A. (1965). Living history. London: Batsford Ltd.
55. Sorrell, A. (1973). The artist and reconstruction. Current Archaeology, 41, 177-181.
56. Spender, D. (1995). Nattering on the net: Women, power and cyberspace. Melbourne: Spinifex Press.
57. Sundén, J. (2002). Material virtualities: Approaching online textual embodiment. In Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, No. 257. Linköping, Sweden: The Tema Institute, Department of Communication Studies, Linköping University.
58. Tringham, R. (2000). The continuous house: A view from the deep past. In S. Gillespie & R. Joyce (Eds.), Beyond kinship: Social and material reproduction in house societies. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
59. Tringham, R. (2004). Interweaving digital narratives with dynamic archaeological databases for the public presentation of cultural heritage. In W Borner & W. Stadtarcheologie (Eds.), Enter the past: The E-way into the four dimensions of Cultural heritage - CAA2003 (pp. 196-200). (Full version on accompanying CD-ROM). Oxford, UK: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology; Archeopress; BAR International Series 1227.
60. Tringham, R. (2005). Weaving house life and death into places: a blueprint for a hypermedia narrative. In D. Bailey, A. Whittle, & V. Cummings (Eds.), (Unsettling the Neolithic (pp. 98-111). Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books.
61. Wolle, A.-C., & Tringham, R. (2000). Multiple Çatalhö yüks on the World Wide Web. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Towards a reflexive method in archaeology: The example at Çatalhöyük (pp. 207-217). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph No. 28.