Lexical plasticity in early bilinguals does not alter phoneme categories: II. Experimental evidence

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2343-2357

  Sebastián Gallés, Núria ^a,b,c   Vera Constán, Fátima ^a   Larsson, Johan P ^b   Costa, Albert ^b,c   Deco, Gustavo ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^c INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTILINGUALISM; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350437593     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21152     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alcina, J., & Blecua, J. M. (1975). Gramática española [Spanish grammar]. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.
2. Bentin, S. (1987). Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition. Brain and Language, 31, 308-327.
3. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-355. (Pubitemid 15136898)
4. Black, A., & Taylor, P. (1997). Festival speech synthesis system: System documentation. Technical report, Human Communication Research Centre.
5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. ( Version 4.3.01) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
6. Bonafonte, A. (2007). Phonetic Catalan dictionary (adaptation to Catalan of the FESTIVAL project). Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Unpublished manuscript.
7. Bosch, L., Costa, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2000). First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 189-222. (Pubitemid 30438985)
8. Cerdà, R. (1972). El timbre vocálico en catalán [Vowel pitch in Catalan]. Madrid: CSIC.
9. Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3647-3658.
10. Connine, C. M. (2004). It's not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1084-1089.
11. Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2007). Hearing speech sounds: Top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception. Hearing Research, 229, 132-147.
12. Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 222-241. (Pubitemid 40687793)
13. Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 224-238. (Pubitemid 40900516)
14. Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2006). Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1950-1953.
15. Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F., & Konopczynski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1276-1293.
16. Friedrich, C., Eulitz, C., & Lahiri, A. (2006). Not every pseudoword disrupts word recognition: An ERP study. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2, 1-36. (Pubitemid 44734198)
17. Goldinger, S. D. (2007). A complementary-systems approach to abstract and episodic speech perception (pp. 49-54). XVI International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany.
18. Holcomb, P. J. (1988). Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic processing. Brain and Language, 35, 66-85. (Pubitemid 18233383)
19. Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47-61.
20. Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O'Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938-950. (Pubitemid 34899144)
21. Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. J. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 281-312.
22. Institut d'Estudis Catalans. (2007). Diccionari de la llengua catalana [Dictionary of the Catalan language]. Barcelona: Enciclopèdia Catalana. Retrieved from http://dlc.iec.cat/index.html. January, 2008.
23. Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? Cognitive Psychology, 51, 141-178.
24. Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 262-268.
25. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463-470.
26. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205. (Pubitemid 10141432)
27. Lahiri, A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 38, 254-294.
28. Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2002). Underspecified recognition. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Werner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology VII (pp. 637-675). Berlin: Mouton.
29. Larsson, J. P., Vera, F., Sebastian-Galles, N., & Deco, G. (2008). Lexical plasticity in early bilinguals does not alter phoneme categories: I. Neurodynamical modelling. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 76-94.
30. Martínez Celdrán, E. (1994). Fonética [Phonetics]. Barcelona: Teide.
31. Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 32, 543-562.
32. Maye, J., & Gerken, L. A. (2001). Learning phonemes: How far can the input take us? Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference in Language Development, Boston, MA, 1, 480-490.
33. Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101-B111. (Pubitemid 34017394)
34. McCallum, W. C., Farmer, S. F., & Pocock, P. V. (1984). The effects of physical and semantic incongruities on auditory event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 59, 477-488.
35. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neo-cortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionists models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457.
36. McLennan, C. T., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (2003). Representation of lexical form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 539-553.
37. McQueen, J., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30, 1113-1126.
38. Mirman, D., McClelland, J. L., & Holt, L. L. (2006). An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 958-965.
39. Munro, M., Derwing, T., & Flege, J. (1999). Canadians in Alabama: A perceptual study of dialect acquisition in adults. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 385-403.
40. Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., et al. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432-434. (Pubitemid 27065927)
41. Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P., & Winkler, I. (2001). "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 283-288.
42. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204-238.
43. Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64, B9-B17. (Pubitemid 127437170)
44. Pallier, C., Colome, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12, 445-449. (Pubitemid 33653559)
45. Pallier, C., Dupoux, E., & Jeannin, X. (1997). EXPE: An expandable programming language for on-line psychological experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29, 322-327.
46. Pallier, C., Sebastian-Galles, N., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A., & Mehler, J. (1998). Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: A cross-linguistic study. Memory & Cognition, 26, 844-851. (Pubitemid 28354796)
47. Peltola, M. S., Kujala, T., Tuomainen, J., Ek, M., Aaltonen, O., & Näätänen, R. (2003). Native and foreign vowel discrimination as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) response. Neuroscience Letters, 352, 25-28. (Pubitemid 37412317)
48. Rafel, J. (1980). Dades sobre la freqüència de les unitats fonològiques del català. Estudis Universitaris Catalans, 24, 473-496.
49. Rafel i Fontanals, J. (1998). Diccionari de freqüències. 3, dades globals [Frequency dictionary. 3, global data]. Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis Catalans.
50. Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Berns, S. M., Pardo, J. S., & Lang, J. M. (1994). On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychological Review, 101, 129-156.
51. Rugg, M. D., & Nagy, M. E. (1987). Lexical contribution to nonword-repetition effects: Evidence from event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 15, 473-481.
52. Sebastian-Galles, N., Dupoux, E., Costa, A., & Mehler, J. (2000). Adaptation to time-compressed speech: Phonological determinants. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 834-842.
53. Sebastian-Galles, N., Echeverria, S., & Bosch, L. (2005). The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 240-255. (Pubitemid 40233698)
54. Sebastian-Galles, N., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., de Diego-Balaguer, R., & Diaz, B. (2006). First- and second-language phonological representations in the mental lexicon. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1277-1291. (Pubitemid 44400746)
55. Sebastian-Galles, N., & Soto-Faraco, S. (1999). Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals. Cognition, 72, 111-123. (Pubitemid 29462586)
56. Smith, M. E., & Halgren, E. (1987). Event-related brain potentials during lexical decision: Effects of repetition, word-frequency, pronounceability, and concreteness. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Supplement, 40, 417-421.
57. Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 322-338. (Pubitemid 40382351)