Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals

Cognition

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 111-123

  Sebastián Gallés, Núria ^a   Soto Faraco, Salvador ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bilingualism; Catalan; Gating; Spanish; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSONANT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PHONEME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SPEECH; SPEECH DEVELOPMENT; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MULTILINGUALISM; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0345426365     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00024-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Best C.T. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. Strange W. Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience. 1995;171-206 York Press, Baltimore, MD.
2. Best C.T., McRoberts G.W., Sithole N.N. The phonological basis of perceptual loss for non-native contrasts: maintenance of discrimination among Zulu clicks by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 14:1988;345-360.
3. Best C.T. The emergence of native-language phonological influence in infants: a perceptual assimilation model. Goodman J.C., Nusbaum H.C. The Development of Speech Perception: The Transition from Speech Sounds to Spoken Words. 1994;167-224 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Flege J.E. Second language speech learning: theory, findings and problems. Strange W. Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience. 1995;233-272 York Press, Baltimore, MD.
5. Goto H. Auditory Perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds 'l' and 'r'. Neuropsychologia. 9:1971;317-323.
6. Grosjean F. Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics. 28:1980;267-283.
7. Grosjean F. Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes. 11:1988;107-134.
8. Grosjean F. Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes. 11:1996;597-604.
9. Hallé P.A., Seguí J., Frauenfelder U., Meunier C. Processing of illegal consonant clusters: a case of perceptual assimilation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24:1998;592-608.
10. Jamieson D.G., Morosan D.E. Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: acquisition of English /q/-/d/ contrast by francophones. Perception and Psychophysics. 40:1986;205-215.
11. Jusczyk P.W. From general to language-specific capacities: the WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. Journal of Phonetics. 21:1993;3-28.
12. Koster C. Word Recognition in Foreign and Native Language. 1987;Foris, Dordrecht.
13. Lively S.E., Pisoni D.B., Yamada R.A., Tohkura Y., Yamada T. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America. 96:1994;2076-2087.
14. Llisterri J. Anàlisi i síntesi de vocals catalanes. Unpublished Master Thesis. 1984;Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
15. Logan J.S., Lively S.E., Pisoni D.B. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America. 89:1991;874-886.
16. Mack M. Consonant and vowel perception and production: early English-French bilinguals and English monolinguals. Perception and Psychophysics. 46:1989;189-200.
17. Mann V.A. Distinguishing universal and language-dependent levels of speech perception: Evidence from Japanese listeners' perception of English [l] and [r]. Cognition. 24:1986;169-196.
18. Martínez-Celdrán E. Fonética. 1984;Teide, Barcelona.
19. Mayberry R., Eichen E. The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;486-512.
20. Miyawaki K., Strange W., Verbrugge R.R., Liberman A.M., Jenkins J.J., Fujimura O. An effect of linguistic experience: the discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception and Psychophysics. 18:1975;331-340.
21. Nooteboom S., Truin P. Word recognition from fragments of spoken words by native and non-native listeners. IPO Annual Progress Report. 15:1980;42-47.
22. Pallier C., Bosch L., Sebastián N. A limit on behavioral plasticity in vowel acquisition. Cognition. 64:1997;B9-B17.
23. Pallier C., Dupoux E., Jeannin X. EXPE: an expandable programming language for on-line psychological experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 29:(3):1997;322-327.
24. Polivanov E. La perception des sons d'une langue étrangère. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague. 4:1932;79-96.
25. Strange W. Cross-language studies of speech perception: a historical review. Strange W. Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience. 1995;3-48 York Press, Baltimore, MD.
26. Trubetzkoy N. Principles of Phonology (C.A. Baltaxe, Trans.). 1969;University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
27. Werker J.F., Tees R.C. Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development. 7:1984;49-63.
28. Werker J.F., Tees R.C. Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 75:1984;1866-1878.