Students' anticipated situational engagement: The roles of teacher behavior, personal engagement, and gender

Journal of Genetic Psychology

Volumn 170, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 268-286

  Thijs, Jochem ^a   Verkuyten, Maykel ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Gender; Personal engagement; Situational engagement; Teacher behavior

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; AUTHORITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NETHERLANDS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STUDENT; TEACHING;

ADOLESCENT; AUTHORITARIANISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MOTIVATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NETHERLANDS; PERMISSIVENESS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EID: 70350336723     PISSN: 00221325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221320903218323     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445.
3. Baumrind, D. (1991a). Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition. In P. A. Cowan & M. Hetherington (Eds.), Family transitions (pp. 111-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Baumrind, D. (1991b). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance abuse. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 56-95.
5. Blais, M. R., & Hess, U. (2002). The interaction between global task motivation and the motivational function of events on self-regulation: Is sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander? Montŕeal, Canada: CIRANO.
6. Chao, R. K. (2001). Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Development, 72, 1832-1843.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65, 493-506.
9. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self-processes and development (Vol. 23, pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.
11. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-137.
12. Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145-158.
13. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
14. Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221-234.
15. Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. C. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
16. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162.
17. Glasgow, K. L.,Dornbusch, S.M., Troyer, L., Steinberg, L.,&Ritter, P. L. (1997). Parenting styles, adolescents' attributions, and educational outcomes in nine heterogeneous high schools. Child Development, 68, 507-529.
18. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Oxford University Press.
19. Green, G., Rhodes, J., Heitler Hirsch, A., Súarez-Orozco, C., & Camic, P. M. (2008). Supportive adult relationships and the academic engagement of Latin American immigrant youth. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 393-412.
20. Harper, S. R., Carini, R. M., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2004). Gender differences in student engagement among African American undergraduates at historically black colleges and universities. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 271-284.
21. Hativa, N., & Birenbaum, M. (2000). Who prefers what? Disciplinary differences in students' preferred approaches to teaching and learning styles. Research in Higher Education, 41, 209-236.
22. Hughes, J. N., Zhang, D.,&Hill, C. R. (2006). Peer assessments of normative and individual teacher-student support predict social acceptance and engagement among low-achieving children. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 447-463.
23. Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R.,&Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Students' attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318-340.
24. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 73, 255-276.
25. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Lau, S., & Roeser, R. W. (2002). Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in highschool students' situational engagement and achievement in science. Educational Assessment, 8, 139-162.
27. Leary, T. (1957). An interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
28. Leung, K., Lau, S., & Lam, W. (1998). Parenting styles and academic achievement: A cross-cultural study. Merill-Palmer Quarterly, 44, 157-172.
29. Rasbash, J., Browne,W., Healy, M., Cameron, B., & Charlton, C. (2004). MLwiN (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. New York: Multilevel Models Project Institute of Education.
30. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147-169.
31. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont,M. J. (1993).Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
32. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22-32.
33. Smerdon, B. A. (1999). Engagement and achievement: Differences between African- American and white high school students. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 12, 103-134.
34. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
35. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics(3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
36. Verkuyten, M., & Canatan, K. (2003). Normative orientation and academic achievement in a school context. In L. Hagendoorn, J. Veenman & W. Vollebergh (Eds.), Integrating immigrants in the Netherlands: Cultural versus socio-economic integration. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
37. Verkuyten, M., Thijs, J., & Canatan, K. (2001). Achievement motivation and academic performance among Turkish early and young adolescents in the Netherlands. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 127, 378-408.
38. Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 287-301.
39. Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1992). Do teacher ideals distort the self-reports of their interpersonal behavior? Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 47-58.