Effects of post materials and length on the stress distribution of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors: A 3D finite element analysis

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 821-830

  Hsu, M L ^a   Chen, C S ^a   Chen, B J ^a   Huang, H H ^a   Chang, C L ^b  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b SHIN KONG WU HO SU MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Adhesive resin cement; Finite element analysis; Glass fiber post; Post length; Post material; Stress distribution; Von Mises stress

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; DENTAL PROCEDURE; PROCEDURES;

BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCISOR; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 70350169791     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02000.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. J Dent. 2007 35 : 778 786.
2. Martinez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fibre post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 80 : 527 532.
3. Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Patterns of vertical root fracture: factors affecting stress distribution in the root canal. J Endod. 2003 29 : 523 528.
4. Neagley RL. The effect of dowel preparation on the apical seal of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969 28 : 739 745.
5. Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 81 : 380 385.
6. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent. 1984 52 : 28 35.
7. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part III. Tooth preparation considerations. J Prosthodont. 1995 4 : 122 128.
8. Vichi A, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fibre posts into a root canal: a microscopic investigation. J Endod. 2002 28 : 355 360.
9. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dent Mater. 2001 17 : 422 429.
10. Ferrari M, Mannocci F. A 'one-bottle' adhesive system for bonding a fibre post into a root canal: an SEM evaluation of the post-resin interface. Int Endodont J. 2000 33 : 397 400.
11. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fibre, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont. 2001 10 : 26 36.
12. Yu WJ, Kwon TY, Kyung HM, Kim KH. An evaluation of localized debonding between fibre post and root canal wall by finite element simulation. Int Endodont J. 2006 39 : 959 967.
13. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-and-core designs cemented with two different cements: an in vitro study. Part I. Quintess Int. 2003 34 : 301 306.
14. Katebzadeh N, Dalton BC, Trope M. Strengthening immature teeth during and after apexification. J Endod. 1998 24 : 256 259.
15. Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 86 : 304 308.
16. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Mater. 2006 22 : 477 485.
17. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fibre, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 17 : 476 482.
18. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 89 : 307 360.
19. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 87 : 431 437.
20. Varvara G, Perinetti G, Di IorioD, Murmura G, Caputi S. In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and failure mode of internally restored endodontically treated maxillary incisors with differing heights of residual dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 98 : 365 372.
21. Isidor F, Odman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fibre posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1996 9 : 131 136.
22. Boschian PestL, Guidotti S, Pietrabissa R, Gagliani M. Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 33 : 690 697.
23. Genovese K, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech. 2005 38 : 2375 2389.
24. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. In : J Dolan, ed. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO : Mosby Elsevier 2006 : 336 378.
25. Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod. 2002 28 : 629 633.
26. De Jager N, de Kler M, van der Zel JM. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns. Dent Mater. 2006 22 : 234 242.
27. Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater. 2005 21 : 709 715.
28. Sorrentino R, Aversa R, Ferro V, Auriemma T, Zarone F, Ferrari M et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strain and stress distributions in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different post, core and crown materials. Dent Mater. 2007 23 : 983 993.
29. Romeed SA, Fok SL, Wilson NH. A comparison of 2D and 3D finite element analysis of a restored tooth. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 33 : 209 215.
30. Rodriguez-Cervantes PJ, Sancho-Bru JL, Barjau-Escribano A, Forner-Navarro L, Perez-Gonzalez A, Sanchez-Marin FT. Influence of prefabricated post dimensions on restored maxillary central incisors. J Oral Rehabil. 2007 34 : 141 152.
31. Yaman SD, Alacam T, Yaman Y. Analysis of stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor subjected to various post and core applications. J Endod. 1998 24 : 107 111.
32. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res. 1996 75 : 871 878.
33. Cailleteau JG, Rieger MR, Akin JE. A comparison of intracanal stresses in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method. J Endod. 1992 18 : 540 544.
34. Toparli M. Stress analysis in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 30 : 470 476. (Pubitemid 37249073)
35. Albuquerque RdeC, Polleto LT, Fontana RH, Cimini CA. Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 30 : 936 943.
36. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials. 2002 23 : 2667 2682.
37. Ukon S, Moroi H, Okimoto K, Fujita M, Ishikawa M, Terada Y et al. Influence of different elastic moduli of dowel and core on stress distribution in root. Dent Mater J. 2000 19 : 50 64.
38. Waltimo A, Kemppainen P, Kononen M. Maximal contraction force and endurance of human jaw-closing muscles in isometric clenching. Scand J Dent Res. 1993 101 : 416 421.
39. Waltimo A, Kononen M. Bite force on single as opposed to all maxillary front teeth. Scand J Dent Res. 1994 102 : 372 375.