Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 690-697

  Boschian Pest, L ^a   Guidotti, S ^a   Pietrabissa, R ^a   Gagliani, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Finite element method; Luting material; Mastication force; Posts; Retention

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; STAINLESS STEEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM;

EID: 33747053898     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01538.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989;15:512-516.
2. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res. 1989;68:1540-1544.
3. Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:458-467.
4. Lambjerg-Hansen H, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. J Oral Rehab. 1997;24:882-887.
5. Cailleteau J G, Rieger MR, Akin JE. A comparison of intracanal stresses in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method. J Endod. 1992;18:540-544.
6. Rengo S, Apicella A, Ausiello P, Morra M, Di Palma L. The importance of the elastic interface in endodontically treated teeth restorations by carbon fiber posts. G It Endo. 1998;4:216-221.
7. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:565-567.
8. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;42:39-44.
9. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumat. 1985;1:108-111.
10. Kvist T, Rydin E, Reit C. The relative frequency of periapical lesions in teeth with root canal-retained posts. J Endod. 1989;15:578-580.
11. Ravanshad S, Torabinejad M. Coronal dye penetration of the apical filling materials after post space preparation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;74:644-647.
12. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:28-35.
13. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:36-40.
14. Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:442-448.
15. Peters MC, Poort HW, Farah JW, Craig RG. Stress analysis of a tooth restored with a post and core. J Dent Res. 1983;62:760-763.
16. Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:304-308.
17. Brandal JL, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. A comparison of three restorative techniques for endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58:161-165.
18. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak B, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:535-543.
19. Hunter AJ, Feiglin B, Williams JF. Effects of post placement on endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:166-172.
20. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. The retentive and stress distributing properties of split threaded endodontic dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:436-442.
21. Mentink AGB, Creugers NHJ, Hoppenbrouwers PMM, Meeuwissen R. Qualitative assessment of stress distribution during insertion of endodontic posts in photoelastic material. J Dent. 1998;26:125-131.
22. Pao YC, Reinhardt RA, Krejci RF. Root stresses with tapered-end post design in periodontally compromised teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:281-286.
23. Augereau D, Pierrisnard L, Renault P, Barquins M. Prosthetic restoration after coronoradicular resection: mechanical behavior of the distal root remaining and surrounding bone. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:467-473.
24. Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod. 2002;28:629-633.
25. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomat. 2002;23:2667-2682.
26. Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:140-147.
27. De Castro Albuquerque R, De Abreu Polleto LT, Fontana RH, Cimini CA. Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts. J Oral Rehab. 2003;30:936-943.
28. Toparli M. Stress analysis in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method. J Oral Rehab. 2003;30:470-476.
29. Ko C, Chu C, Lee M. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:421-427.
30. Cavalli G, Bertani P, Generali P. Finite element stress analysis in post and crown restored teeth. G It Endo. 1996;3:107-112.
31. Cavalli G, Bertani P, Generali P. Il restauro preprotesico e protesico del dente trattato endodonticamente. Strategie cliniche. Dent Cad. 1998;11:9-28.
32. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Ozcan M, Platzer U. Effect of length and diameter of tapered posts on the retention. J Oral Rehab. 2002;29:28-34.