Influence of prefabricated post dimensions on restored maxillary central incisors

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 141-152

  Rodriguez Cervantes P J ^a,c   Sancho Bru, J L ^a   Barjau Escribano, A ^b   Forner Navarro, L ^b   Perez Gonzalez A ^a   Sanchez Marin F T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^c Campus de Riu Sec ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Biomechanical performance; Elastic modulus; Influence of post dimensions; Prefabricated intraradicular posts; Stress distribution

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; STAINLESS STEEL;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; THEORETICAL MODEL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; STAINLESS STEEL;

EID: 33846416223     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01720.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Walton RE, Torabinejad M. Principles and practice of endodontics, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders and Company; 2002.
2. Robbins JW. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120:558-566.
3. Milot P, Stein S. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:428-435.
4. Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber post. J Endod. 1998;24:807-810.
5. Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I. Factors determining post selection: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:556-562.
6. Barjau-Escribano A, Sancho-Bru JL, Forner-Navarro L, Rodríguez- Cervantes PJ, Pérez-González A, Sánchez-Marín FT. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: fracture strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent. 2006;31:47-54.
7. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:431-437.
8. Christensen GJ. Posts and cores: state of the art. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:96-97.
9. Smith CT, Schuman N. Prefabricated post-and-core systems: an overview. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998;19:1013-1018.
10. Smith CT, Schuman NJ, Wasson W. Biomechanical criteria for evaluating prefabricated post-and-core systems: a guide for the restorative dentist. Quintessence Int. 1998;29:305-312.
11. Ottl P, Lauer HC. Success rates for two different types of post-and-cores. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:752-758.
12. Fox K, Wood DJ, Youngson CC. A clinical report of 85 fractured metallic post-retained crowns. Int Endod J. 2004;37:561-573.
13. Hirschfeld Z, Stern N. Post and core: the biomechanical aspect. Aust Dent J. 1972;17:467-468.
14. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39:400-405.
15. Davy DT, Dilley GL, Krejci RF. Determination of stress patterns in root-filled teeth incorporating various dowel designs. J Dent Res. 1981;60:1301-1310.
16. Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:140-147.
17. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Ozcan M, Platzer U. Effect of length and diameter of tapered posts on the retention. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:28-34.
18. Sen D, Poyrazoglu E, Tuncelli B. The retentive effects of prefabricated posts by luting cements. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:585-589.
19. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:419-424.
20. Nicholls JI, The dental ferrule and the endodontically compromised tooth. Quintessence Int. 2001;32:171-173.
21. Zalkind M, Shkury S, Stern N, Heling I. Effect of prefabricated metal post-head design on the retention of various core materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:483-487.
22. Hochman N, Feinzaig I, Zalkind M. Effect of design of prefabricated posts and post heads on the retention of various cements and core materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:702-707.
23. Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A. The influence of fatigue loading on the quality of the cement layer and retention strength of carbon fiber post-resin composite core restorations. Oper Dent. 2005;30:220-227.
24. Korioth TW, Waldron TW, Versluis A, Schulte JK. Forces and moments generated at the dental incisors during forceful biting in humans. J Biomech. 1997;30:631-633.
25. Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod. 2002;28:629-633.
26. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive and photoelastic properties of two prefabricated endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:488-494.
27. Albuquerque Rde C, Polleto LT, Fontana RH, Cimini CA. Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:936-943.
28. Stern N, Hirshfeld Z. Principles of preparing endodontically treated teeth for dowel and core restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;30:162-165.
29. Mattison GD, Delivanis PD, Thacker RW Jr, Hassell KJ. Effect of post preparation on the apical seal. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:785-789.
30. Kvist T, Rydin E, Reit C. The relative frequency of periapical lesions in teeth with root canal-retained posts. J Endod. 1989;15:578-580.