Effect of temperature on the structure and phase behavior of water confined by hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and heterogeneous surfaces

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 113, Issue 42, 2009, Pages 13723-13734

  Giovambattista, Nicolas ^a,b   Rossky, Peter J ^c   Debenedetti, Pablo G ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b Princeton University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFINED FLOW; CONTACT ANGLE; COOLING; COOLING WATER; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; LIQUIDS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; ORGANIC POLYMERS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); SURFACE CHEMISTRY; TEMPERATURE; THERMAL EFFECTS; WATER VAPOR;

BILAYER ICE; COLD DENATURATION; CONFINED WATER; CONSTANT TEMPERATURE; CRITICAL SEPARATION; CRYSTAL PHASIS; DENSITY PROFILE; EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE; EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE; FIXED TEMPERATURE; HETEROGENEOUS SURFACE; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC; HYDROPHOBIC CAVITIES; HYDROPHOBIC PLATES; HYDROPHOBIC SURFACES; ISOBARIC COOLING; ISOTHERMAL COMPRESSIONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; NANO SCALE; NANOSCALE CONFINEMENT; PLATE SEPARATION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; SOFT MATTER; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; VAPOR PHASE; WATER CONTACT ANGLE; WATER DENSITY;

PHASE INTERFACES;

EID: 70350091577     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp9018266     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Yang, B.; van Hoek, A. N.; Verkman, A. S. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 7625.
2. Pohl, P.; Saparov, S. M.; Borgnia, M. J.; Agre, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 9624.
3. Fujiyoshi, Y.; Mitsuoka, K.; de Groot, B. L.; Philippsen, A.; Grubmüller, H.; Agre, P.; Engel, A. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002, 12, 509.
4. Zhu, Y.; Granick, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 096104.
5. Raviv, U.; Giasson, S.; Frey, J.; Klein, J. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 9275.
6. Opitz, A.; Ahmed, I.-U.; Schaefer, J. A.; Scherge, M. Surf. Sci. 2002, 504, 199.
7. Chmiola, J.; Yushin, G.; Gogotsi, Y.; Portet, C.; Simon, P.; Taberna, P. L. Science 2006, 313, 1760.
8. Jinesh, K. B.; Franken, J. W. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 036101.
9. Koga, K.; Zeng, X. C.; Tanaka, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79, 5262.
10. Tanford, C. The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membranes, 2nd ed.; Wiley; New York, 1980.
11. Levy, Y.; Onuchic, J. N. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2006, 35, 389.
12. Kauzmann. W. Adv. Protein Chem. 1959, 14, 1.
13. Luni, K.; Chandler, D.; Weeks, J. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 4570.
14. Ben-Naim, A. Hydrophobic Interactions; Plenum; New York, 1980.
15. Wu. J.; Prausnitz, J. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105. 9512.
16. Huang, X.; Margulis, C. J.; Berne, B. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 11953.
17. Linse, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8793.
18. Widom, B.; Bhimalapuram, P.; Koga, K. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 3085.
19. Ashbaugh, H. S.; Pratt, L. R. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2006, 78, 159.
20. Structure and Dynamics of Mambranes. In Handbook of Biological Physics; Lipowsky R., Sackmann E., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995; Vols 1A and 1B.
21. Faeder, J.; Ladanyi, B. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 1033.
22. Faeder, J.; Ladanyi, B. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 6732.
23. Harpham, M. R.; Ladanyi, B. M.; Levinger, N. E.; Herwig, K. W. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 7855.
24. Brandem, C.; Tooze, J. Introduction to protein structure, 2nd ed.; Garland Publishing; New York, 1998.
25. Dill, K. A. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 7133.
26. Fersht, A. R. Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science; W. H. Freeman and Co.: New York; 1999.
27. Brooks, C. L.; Onuchic, J. N.; Wales, D. J. Science 2001, 293, 612.
28. Brooks, C. L.; Gruebele, M.; Onuchic, J. N.; Wolynes, P. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 11037.
29. Dobson, C. M.; Sali, A.; Karplus, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 868.
30. Privalov, P. L.; Makhatadze, G. I. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 232, 660.
31. Honig, B.; Yang, A.-S. Protein Chem. 1995, 46, 27
32. Sturtevant, J. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1977, 74, 2236.
33. Williams, D. H.; Searle, M. S.; Mackay, J. P.; Gerhard, U.; Maplestone, R. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 1172.
34. Froloff, N.; Windemuth, A.; Honig, B. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 1293.
35. Chandler, D. Nature 2005, 437, 640.
36. Lu, L.; Berkowitz, M. L. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 101101.
37. Li, L.; Bedrov, D.; Smith, G. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 10509.
38. Zangi, R.; Hagen, M.; Berne, B. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4678.
39. Lund, M.; Jungwirth, P.; Woodward, C. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 258105.
40. Bratko, D.; Curtis, R. A.; Blanch, H. W.; Prausnitz, J. M. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 3873.
41. Rajamani, S.; Truskett, T. M.; Garde, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 9475.
42. Ravindra, R.; Winter, R. ChemphysChem 2003, 4, 359.
43. Giovambattista, N.; Rossky, P. J.; Debenedetti, P. G. Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2006, 73, 041604.
44. Giovambattista, N.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Rossky, P. J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1323.
45. Goel, G.; Athawale, M. V.; Garde. S.; Truskett, T. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 13193.
46. Hummer, G.; Rasaiah, J. C.; Noworyta, J. P. Nature 2001, 414, 188.
47. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma. J. P. M.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; DiNola. A.; Haak, J. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 81, 3684.
48. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Grigera, J. R.; Stroatsma, T. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269.
49. Sanz, E.; Vega, C.; Abascal, J. L. F.; MacDowell, L. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 255701.
50. Iler, R. K. The Chemistry of Silica; Wiley: New York, 1979.
51. Hammond, C. The Basics of Crystallography and Diffraction; Oxford University Press: New York, 2001; p 31.
52. Toukmaji, A. Y.; Board, J. A., Jr. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1996, 95, 73.
53. Nymand, T. M.; Linse, P. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 6152.
54. Starr, F. W.; Sciortino, F.; Stanley, H. E. Phys. Rev. E 1999, 60, 6757.
55. Leung, K.; Luzar, A.; Bratko, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90, 65502.
56. Harrington, S.; Poole, P.; Sciortino, F.; Stanley, H. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 7443.
57. For a better comparison with our results, the values of P taken from, refs 54 and 56 have been corrected so Lennard-Jones corrections are eliminated (see footnote 86 in ref. 57). Therefore, the data shown in Figure 3 for the bulk case correspond to data at P = -0.1 GPa in refs 54 and 56 Our conclusions hold even if one considers the bulk densities at P = -0 GPa from these works.
58. Kumar, P.; Buldyrev, S. V.; Starr, F. W.; Giovambattista, N.; Stanley, H. E. Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2005, 72, 051503.
59. Meyer, M.; Stanley, H. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 9728.
60. Derjaguin, B. V.; Karasev, V. V.; Khromova, E. N. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1986, 109, 586.
61. Xu, S.; Simmons, G. C.; Scherer, G. W. Mater Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2004, 790, 85.
62. Garofalini, S. H.; Mahadevan, T. S.; Xu, S.; Scherer, G. W. ChemPhysChem 2008, 9, 1997.
63. Lopez, C. F.; Darst, R. K.; Rossky, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. B 2008, 112, 5961.
64. Patel, B. A.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Stillinger, F. H.; Rossky, P. J. Biophys. J. 2007, 93, 4116.
65. Hawley, S. A. Biochemistry 1971, 10, 2436.
66. We define the coordination number of a given water molecule as the number of neighboring oxygen, atoms within a distance 0.32 nm from the molecule's oxygen atom. The neighboring oxygen atoms can belong to neighboring water molecules or to the plates.
67. Errington, J. R.; Debenedetti, P. G. Nature 2001, 409, 318.
68. In both hydrophobic and hydrophilic cases, molecules adjacent to the plates can have oxygen nearest-neighbors belonging to the surface. These surface oxygen atoms are also included in the calculations of water molecule tetrahedral order (q) and coordination number (CN).
69. Romero-Vargas Castrillón, S.; Giovambattista, N.; Aksay, I. A.; Debenedetti, P. G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 1438.
70. Lombardo, T. G.; Giovambattista, N.; Debenedetti, P. G. Faraday Discuss. 2009, 141, 359.
71. Giovambattista, N.; Rossky, P. J.; Debenedetti, P. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 050603.
72. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids; Oxford University Press: New York, 2004.
73. Werder. T.; Walther, J. H.; Jaffe, R. L.; Halicioglu, T.; Koumoutsakos, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 1345.
74. Giovambattista, N.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Rossky, P. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 9581.
75. Daub, C. D.; Bratko, D.; Leung, K.; Luzar, A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 505.
76. Koishi, T.; Yasuoka, K.; Ebisuzaki, T.; Yoo, S.; Cheng, X. C. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 204707.
77. To calculate the contact angle of the hydrophobic surface, we use a cubic system with, sides of length. L = 13.86 nm. A square wall of dimenesions L x. L is located on one side of the system box, parallel to the x-y plane. The atomic-scale wall structure is the same as the hydrophobic plates used in Section. III. We use periodic boundary conditions along the x and y axes. Therefore, the wall is effectively "infinite" along these directions.
78. Lee, C. Y.; McCammon, J. A.; Rossky, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 4448.
79. Hummer, G.; Garde, S.; García, A. E.; Paulaitis, M. E.; Pratt, L. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 1552.
80. We note that the there is a mistake in the labels of Figure 12b of ref 43. In that figure, the labels P = -0.05 GPa and P = 0.2 GPa should be exchanged.
81. Lee, C. Y.; Rossky, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 3334.
82. 4 tetrahedra that point into the confined volume.
83. Hua, L.; Huang, X.; Liu, P.; Zhou, R.; Berne, B. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 9069.
84. Ball, P. ChemPhysChem 2008, 9, 2677.
85. Tsonopoulos, C. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2001, 185, 186.
86. Ashbaugh, H. S.; Truskett, T. M.; Debenedetti, P. G. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 2907.
87. Giovambattista, N.; Lopez, C. F.; Rossky, P. J.; Debenedetti. P. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 2214.