A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: A gait analysis study

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 812-818

  Mayr, Eckart ^a   Nogler, Michael ^a   Benedetti, Maria Grazia ^b   Kessler, Oliver ^c   Reinthaler, Andrea ^a   Krismer, Martin ^a   Leardini, Alberto ^b  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c Scientific Affairs   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Functional recovery; Gait analysis; Hip surgery; Minimally invasive

Indexed keywords

CORONAL PLANES; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; GAIT PARAMETERS; HIP FLEXION; HIP JOINTS; HIP SURGERY; KINEMATICS ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL; MOTOR FUNCTION; RANGE OF MOTIONS; SINGLE SUPPORT; STEP TIME; STYLE SHEETS; TIME-DISTANCE; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS; WALKING SPEED;

HIP PROSTHESES; PATIENT MONITORING; SURGERY;

GAIT ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOOT; GAIT; HIP DISEASE; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT MOBILITY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WALKING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349991269     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baker A.S., and Bitounis V.C. Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 71 1 (1989) 47-50
2. Bauer R., Kerschbaumer F., Poisel S., and Oberthaler W. The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 95 1-2 (1979) 47-49
3. Bell A.L., Pedersen D.R., and Brand R.A. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J. Biomech. 23 6 (1990) 617-621
4. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., Campbell J., and Stitt L.W. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J. Rheumatol. 15 12 (1988) 1833-1840
5. Benedetti M.G., Catani F., Leardini A., Pignotti E., and Giannini S. Data management in gait analysis for clinical applications. Clin. Biomech. 13 3 (1998) 204-215
6. Bennett D., Ogonda L., Elliott D., Humphreys L., Lawlor M., and Beverland D. Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study. J. Arthroplasty 22 4 (2007) 490-495
7. Crenshaw A. Surgical Approaches. eighth ed. (1992), Mosby, St. Louis
8. Della Croce U., Leardini A., Chiari L., and Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics. Gait Posture 21 2 (2005) 226-237
9. Downing N.D., Clark D.I., Hutchinson J.W., Colclough K., and Howard P.W. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop. Scand. 72-73 (2001) 215-220
10. Ferrari A., Benedetti M.G., Pavan E., Frigo C., Bettinelli D., Rabuffetti M., Crenna P., and Leardini A. Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis. Gait Posture 28 2 (2008) 207-216
11. Goldstein W.M., Branson J.J., Berland K.A., and Gordon A.C. Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 85-A Suppl. 4 (2003) 33-38
12. Gore D.R., Murray M.P., Sepic S.B., and Gardner G.M. Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 165 (1982) 180-187
13. Hart R., Stipcak V., Janecek M., and Visna P. Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. Acta Orthop. Belg. 71 1 (2005) 60-64
14. Howell J.R., Masri B.A., and Duncan C.P. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 35 2 (2004) 153-162
15. Hurwitz D.E., Hulet C.H., Andriacchi T.P., Rosenberg A.G., and Galante J.O. Gait compensations in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and their relationship to pain and passive hip motion. J. Orthop. Res. 15 4 (1997) 629-635
16. Keggi K.J., Huo M.H., and Zatorski L.E. Anterior approach to total hip replacement: surgical technique and clinical results of our first one thousand cases using non-cemented prostheses. Yale J. Biol. Med. 66 3 (1993) 243-256
17. Krismer M., and Rachbauer F. Direct, Anterior, Single-incision Approach (2004), Springer Medizin Verlag, Heidelberg pp. 47-54
18. Leardini A., Sawacha Z., Paolini G., Ingrosso S., Nativo R., and Benedetti M.G. A new anatomically based protocol for gait analysis in children. Gait Posture 26 4 (2007) 560-571
19. Long W.T., Dorr L.D., Healy B., and Perry J. Functional recovery of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 288 (1993) 73-77
20. Madsen M.S., Ritter M.A., Morris H.H., Meding J.B., Berend M.E., Faris P.M., and Vardaxis V.G. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J. Orthop. Res. 22 1 (2004) 44-50
21. McCrory J.L., White S.C., and Lifeso R.M. Vertical ground reaction forces: objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 14 2 (2001) 104-109
22. Meneghini R.M., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., and Hozack W.J. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 453 (2006) 293-298
23. Meneghini R.M., Smits S.A., Swinford R.R., and Bahamonde R.E. A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: comprehensive gait analysis. J. Arthroplasty 23 6 Suppl. 1 (2008) 68-73
24. Murray M.P., Gore D.R., and Clarkson B.H. Walking patterns of patients with unilateral hip pain due to osteo-arthritis and avascular necrosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 53 2 (1971) 259-274
25. Murray M.P., Brewer B.J., and Zuege R.C. Kinesiologic measurements of functional performance before and after McKee-Farrar total hip replacement. A study of thirty patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, or avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 54 2 (1972) 237-256
26. Nogler M., Mayr E., Krismer M., and Thaler M. Reduced variability in cup positioning: the direct anterior surgical approach using navigation. Acta Orthop. 79 6 (2008) 789-793
27. Ogonda L., Wilson R., Archbold P., Lawlor M., Humphreys P., O'Brien S., and Beverland D. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87 4 (2005) 701-710
28. Perron M., Malouin F., Moffet H., and McFadyen B.J. Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Biomech. 15 7 (2000) 504-515
29. Rachbauer F. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Anterior approach. Orthopade 35 7 (2006) 723-724 6-9
30. Rigas C., and Xenakis T. Pre- and post-operative gait analysis of hip osteoarthritic patients fitted with ceramic Autophor total hip replacement. Eng. Med. 17 1 (1988) 3-6
31. Ritter M.A., Albohm M.J., Keating E.M., Faris P.M., and Meding J.B. Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 10 6 (1995) 737-741
32. Ritter M.A., Harty L.D., Keating M.E., Faris P.M., and Meding J.B. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 385 (2001) 95-99
33. Stauffer R.N., Smidt G.L., and Wadsworth J.B. Clinical and biomechanical analysis of gait following Charnley total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 99 (1974) 70-77
34. Tanaka Y. Gait analysis of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and the those with total hip arthroplasty. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 8 3-4 (1998) 187-196
35. Vaz M.D., Kramer J.F., Rorabeck C.H., and Bourne R.B. Isometric hip abductor strength following total hip replacement and its relationship to functional assessments. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 18 4 (1993) 526-531
36. Vicar A.J., and Coleman C.R. A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 188 (1984) 152-159
37. Ward S.R., Jones R.E., Long W.T., Thomas D.J., and Dorr L.D. Functional recovery of muscles after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Instrum. Course Lect. 57 (2008) 249-254
38. Whatling G.M., Dabke H.V., Holt C.A., Jones L., Madete J., Alderman P.M., and Roberts P. Objective functional assessment of total hip arthroplasty following two common surgical approaches: the posterior and direct lateral approaches. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H] 222 6 (2008) 897-905
39. Wohlrab D., Hagel A., and Hein W. Advantages of minimal invasive total hip replacement in the early phase of rehabilitation. Z. Orthop. Grenzgeb. 142 6 (2004) 685-690
40. Woolson S.T., Mow C.S., Syquia J.F., Lannin J.V., and Schurman D.J. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 86 A7 (2004) 1353-1358
41. Wu G., and Cavanagh P.R. ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. J. Biomech. 28-10 (1995) 1257-1261
42. Wu G., Siegler S., Allard P., Kirtley C., Leardini A., Rosenbaum D., Whittle M., D'Lima D.D., Cristofolini L., Witte H., Schmid O., and Stokes I. Standardization and Terminology Committee of the International Society of Biomechanics. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion - part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J. Biomech. 35 4 (2002) 543-548