|
Volumn 142, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 685-690
|
Advantages of minimal invasive total hip replacement in the early phase of rehabilitation;Vorteile der minimalinvasiven implantation von hüfttotalendoprothesen in der frühen postoperativen rehabilitationsphase
|
Author keywords
Mayo hip; Minimal invasive; One incision technique; Short stem hip prosthesis; Total hip arthroplasty
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
GLUTEUS MAXIMUS MUSCLE;
HARRIS HIP SCORE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MALE;
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY;
MOBILIZATION;
MUSCLE INJURY;
NERVE INJURY;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION;
SKIN INCISION;
SOFT TISSUE INJURY;
STANDARD;
SURGICAL APPROACH;
TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;
VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;
AGED;
ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP;
EARLY AMBULATION;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP;
OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
REHABILITATION CENTERS;
RISK FACTORS;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;
|
EID: 12444278973
PISSN: 00443220
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-832447 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (74)
|
References (9)
|