What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery?

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1693-1700

  Botden, Sanne M B I ^a,b   Jakimowicz, Jack J ^a,b  

^a CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b FACULTY OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Minimally invasive surgery; Simulation; Training

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDLINE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL TRAINING; SUTURING METHOD; VIRTUAL REALITY; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EDUCATION; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; REINFORCEMENT; TEACHING; TOUCH;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; TEACHING MATERIALS; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70349759872     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0144-1     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. A Darzi S Smith N Taffinder 1999 Assessing operative skill needs to become more objective Br Med J 318 887 888 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jtVCluw%3D%3D
2. AJ Dufy NJ Hogle H McCarthy JI Lew A Egan P Christos 2005 Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator Surg Endosc 19 401 405 10.1007/s00464-004-8202-9 (Pubitemid 40897943)
3. T Grantcharov 2004 Randomized clinical trail of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training Br J Surg 91 2 146 150 14760660 10.1002/bjs.4407 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2FlvVClsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38233958)
4. R Aggarwal K Moorthy A Darzi 2004 Laparoscopic skills training and assessment Br J Surg 91 1549 1558 15547882 10.1002/bjs.4816 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2cngt12nug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39619916)
5. SMBI Botden F Torab SN Buzink JJ Jakimowicz 2008 The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of Virtual Reality simulation Surg Endosc 22 5 1214 1222 17943369 10.1007/s00464-007-9589-x (Pubitemid 351624378)
6. KK Hyun D Rattner MA Srinivasan 2004 Virtual-reality-based laparoscopic surgical training: the role of simulation fidelity in haptic feedback Comput Aided Surg 9 5 227 234 10.1080/10929080500066997 (Pubitemid 41132331)
7. H Maass B Cantier HK Cakmak C Trantakis UG Kuehnapfel 2003 Fundamentals of force feedback and application to a surgery simulator Comput Aided Surg 8 6 283 291 15742665 10.3109/10929080309146066
8. GBS Tholey JP Desay AE Castellanos 2005 Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis Ann Surg 241 1 102 109 15621997
9. S Gunther J Rosen B Hannaford MN Sinanan 2007 The red DRAGON: a multi-modality system for simulation and training in minimally invasive surgery Stud Health Technol Inform 125 149 154 17377255
10. J Rosen JD Brown L Chang MN Sinanan B Hannaford 2006 Generalized approach for modeling minimally invasive surgery as a stochastic process using a discrete Markov model IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53 3 399 413 16532766 10.1109/TBME.2005.869771 (Pubitemid 43288817)
11. J Rosen C Richards B Hannaford MN Sinanan 2000 Hidden Markov models of minimally invasive surgery Stud Health Technol Inform 70 279 285 10977557 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FgsFWhtg%3D%3D
12. C Richards J Rosen B Hannaford C Pellegrini MN Sinanan 2000 Skills evaluation in minimally invasive surgery using force/torque signatures Surg Endosc 14 9 791 798 11000356 10.1007/s004640000230 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3cvkvFGruw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30737948)
13. J Rosen M Solazzo B Hannaford MN Sinanan 2002 Task decomposition of laparoscopic surgery for objective evaluation of surgical residents' learning curve using hidden Markov model Comput Aided Surg 7 1 49 61 12173880 10.3109/10929080209146016
14. J Rosen M Solazzo B Hannaford MN Sinanan 2001 Objective laparoscopic skills assessments of surgical residents using Hidden Markov Models based on haptic information and tool/tissue interactions Stud Health Technol Inform 81 417 423 11317782 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzmvFSjtw%3D%3D
15. J Rosen JD Brown M Barreca L Chang B Hannaford MN Sinanan 2002 The Blue DRAGON-a system for monitoring the kinematics and the dynamics of endoscopic tools in minimally invasive surgery for objective laparoscopic skill assessment Stud Health Technol Inform 85 412 418 15458124
16. J Rosen L Chang JD Brown B Hannaford MN Sinanan R Satava 2003 Minimally invasive surgery task decomposition-etymology of endoscopic suturing Stud Health Technol Inform 94 295 301 15455911
17. J Rosen B Hannaford CG Richards MN Sinanan 2001 Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48 5 579 591 11341532 10.1109/10.918597 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzktFarsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32378059)
18. J Rosen M MacFarlane CG Richards B Hannaford MN Sinanan 1999 Surgeon-tool force/torque signatures-evaluation of surgical skills in minimally invasive surgery Stud Health Technol Inform 62 290 296 10538374 1:STN:280: DyaK1MzgvVShtQ%3D%3D
19. VK Narula WC Watson SS Davis K Hinshaw BJ Needleman DJ Mikami JW Hazey JH Winston P Muscarella M Rubin V Patel WS Melvin 2007 A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance Surg Endosc 21 12 2258 2261 17522931 10.1007/s00464-007-9363-0 (Pubitemid 350125954)
20. D Broe PF Ridgway S Johnson S Tierney KC Conlon 2006 Construct validation of a novel hybrid surgical simulator Surg Endosc 20 6 900 904 16738979 10.1007/s00464-005-0530-x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28zisVensQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43825194)
21. EM Ritter TW Kindeland C Michael EA Pimentel MW Bowyer 2007 Concurrent validity of augmented reality metrics applied to the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) Surg Endosc 21 1441 1445 17593461 10.1007/s00464-007-9261-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svjtVSksw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 47125067)
22. SMBI Botden SN Buzink MP Schijven JJ Jakimowicz 2007 Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator World J Surg 31 4 764 772 17361356 10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y (Pubitemid 46496229)
23. KR Sickle Van 2005 Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task Surg Endosc 19 1227 1231 10.1007/s00464-004- 8274-6 (Pubitemid 41558418)
24. Botden SMBI, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ (2008) Face Validity Study of the ProMIS Augmented Reality Laparoscopic Suturing Simulator. Surg Technol Int 17 (in press)
25. L Chang J Petros DT Hess C Rotondi TJ Babineau 2007 Integrating simulation into a surgical residency program: is voluntary participation effective? Surg Endosc 21 3 418 421 17180282 10.1007/s00464-006-9051-5 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXpvVKmsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 46318758)
26. S Maithel R Sierra J Korndorffer P Neumann S Dwason D Jones D Scott 2006 Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS: are we ready for skills assessment using simulators? Surg Endosc 20 1 104 112 16333535 10.1007/s00464-005-0054-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FitFWhtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43097042)
27. SK Maithel L Villegas N Stypolous S Dawson DB Jones 2005 Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue Surg Endosc 19 3 406 411 15624063 10.1007/s00464-004-8177-6 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzhtFyqsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40897944)
28. N Stylopoulos S Cotin SK Maithel M Ottensmeyer PG Jackson RS Bardsley PF Neumann DW Rattner SL Dawson 2004 Computer-enhanced laparoscopic training system (CELTS): bridging the gap Surg Endosc 18 5 782 789 15216861 10.1007/s00464-003-8932-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czhsFWjsA%3D%3D
29. N Stylopoulos S Cotin S Dawson M Ottensmyer P Neumann R Bardsley M Russel P Jackson D Rattner 2003 CELTS: a clinically-based Computer Enhanced Laparoscopic Training System Stud Health Technol Inform 94 336 342 15455919
30. HK Kim DW Rattner MA Srinivasan 2004 Virtual-reality-based laparoscopic surgical training: the role of simulation fidelity in haptic feedback Comput Aided Surg 9 5 227 234 16192064 10.1080/10929080500066997 (Pubitemid 41132331)
31. R Aggarwal K Moorthy A Darzi 2004 Laparoscopic skills training and assessment Br J Surg 91 12 1549 1558 15547882 10.1002/bjs.4816 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cngt12nug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39619916)
32. P Strom L Hedman L Sarna A Kjellin T Wredmark L Fellander-Tsai 2006 Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents Surg Endosc 20 9 1383 1388 16823652 10.1007/s00464-005-0545-3 1:STN:280: DC%2BD28rmtlCrsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44451249)
33. P Lamata EJ Gomez FM Sanchez-Margallo F Lamata M Antolin S Rodriguez A Oltra J Uson 2006 Study of laparoscopic forces perception for defining simulation fidelity Stud Health Technol Inform 119 288 292 16404064
34. R Gonzales S Bowers CD Smith BJ Ramshaw 2004 Does setting specific goals and providing feedback during training resulting better acquisition of laparoscopic skills? Am Surg 70 35 39
35. GM Fried LS Feldman MC Vassiliou SA Fraser D Stanbridge G Ghitulescu CG Andrew 2004 Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery Ann Surg 240 3 518 525 15319723 10.1097/01.sla.0000136941.46529.56 discussion 525-528 (Pubitemid 39121346)
36. AK Madan CT Frantzides N Shervin CL Tebbit 2003 Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers Am Surg 69 12 1112 1114 14700302
37. JR Korndorffer Jr JB Dunne R Sierra D Stefanidis CL Touchard DJ Scott 2005 Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room J Am Coll Surg 201 1 23 29 15978440 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.021 (Pubitemid 40840560)