Neutrophil morphology and migration are affected by substrate elasticity

Blood

Volumn 114, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1387-1395

  Oakes, Patrick W ^a   Patel, Dipan C ^b   Morin, Nicole A ^b   Zitterbart, Daniel P ^c   Fabry, Ben ^c   Reichner, Jonathan S ^b   Tang, Jay X ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 MORPHOLINO 8 PHENYLCHROMONE; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; 2-(4-MORPHOLINYL)-8-PHENYL-4H-1-BENZOPYRAN-4-ONE; CHROMONE DERIVATIVE; ENZYME INHIBITOR; MORPHOLINE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME INHIBITION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NEUTROPHIL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; CELL MOTION; CYTOLOGY; DRUG ANTAGONISM; DRUG EFFECT; ELASTICITY; GEL; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

1-PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASE; CELL ADHESION; CELL MOVEMENT; CHROMONES; ELASTICITY; ENZYME INHIBITORS; GELS; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MORPHOLINES; NEUTROPHILS;

EID: 70349328417     PISSN: 00064971     EISSN: 15280020     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-11-191445     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Pelham RJ Jr, Wang YL. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:13661-13665.
2. Janmey PA, Weitz DA. Dealing with mechanics: mechanisms of force transduction in cells. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004;29:364-370.
3. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 2005;310:1139-1143. (Pubitemid 41681732)
4. Ali MH, Schumacker PT. Endothelial responses to mechanical stress: where is the mechanosensor? Crit Care Med. 2002;30[suppl]:S198-S206. (Pubitemid 34507991)
5. Lo CM, Wang HB, Dembo M, Wang YL. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J. 2000;79:144-152. (Pubitemid 30436733)
6. Effler JC, Kee YS, Berk JM, Tran MN, Iglesias PA, Robinson DN. Mitosis-specific mechanosensing and contractile-protein redistribution control cell shape. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1962-1967.
7. Ghosh K, Pan Z, Guan E, et al. Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. Biomaterials. 2007;28:671-679. (Pubitemid 44647459)
8. Flanagan LA, Ju YE, Marg B, Osterfield M, Janmey PA. Neurite branching on deformable substrates. Neuroreport. 2002;13:2411-2415.
9. Engler AJ, Griffin MA, Sen S, Bonnemann CG, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J Cell Biol. 2004;166:877-887. (Pubitemid 39249838)
10. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M, Discher D. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J. 2004;86:617-628. (Pubitemid 38067491)
11. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126:677-689. (Pubitemid 44233625)
12. Yeung T, Georges PC, Flanagan LA, et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2005;60:24-34. (Pubitemid 40066224)
13. Wang HB, Dembo M, Hanks SK, Wang Y. Focal adhesion kinase is involved in mechanosensing during fibroblast migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:11295-11300. (Pubitemid 32928722)
14. Smith LA, Aranda-Espinoza H, Haun JB, Dembo M, Hammer DA. Neutrophil traction stresses are concentrated in the uropod during migration. Biophys J. 2007;92:L58-L60. (Pubitemid 46536410)
15. Sato M, Suzuki K, Ueki Y, Ohashi T. Microelastic mapping of living endothelial cells exposed to shear stress in relation to three-dimensional distribution of actin filaments. Acta Biomater. 2007;3:311-319. (Pubitemid 46555120)
16. Mathur AB, Collinsworth AM, Reichert WM, Kraus WE, Truskey GA. Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. J Biomech. 2001;34:1545-1553.
17. Kataoka N, Iwaki K, Hashimoto K, et al. Measurements of endothelial cell-to-cell and cell-to-substrate gaps and micromechanical properties of endothelial cells during monocyte adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:15638-15643. (Pubitemid 35403984)
18. Van Houten EE, Doyley MM, Kennedy FE, Weaver JB, Paulsen KD. Initial in vivo experience with steady-state subzone-based MR elastography of the human breast. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:72-85. (Pubitemid 36034137)
19. Samani A, Bishop J, Luginbuhl C, Plewes DB. Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:2183-2198. (Pubitemid 36934427)
20. Uffmann K, Maderwald S, Ajaj W, et al. In vivo elasticity measurements of extremity skeletal muscle with MR elastography. NMR Biomed. 2004;17:181-190. (Pubitemid 39089245)
21. Matsumoto T, Abe H, Ohashi T, Kato Y, Sato M. Local elastic modulus of atherosclerotic lesions of rabbit thoracic aortas measured by pipette aspiration method. Physiol Meas. 2002;23:635-648. (Pubitemid 35386572)
22. Georges PC, Hui J-J, Gombos Z, et al. Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: implications for fibrosis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G1147-G1154. (Pubitemid 350255055)
23. Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:173-182.
24. Choi M, Salanova B, Rolle S, et al. Short-term heat exposure inhibits inflammation by abrogating recruitment of and nuclear factor-κB activation in neutrophils exposed to chemotactic cytokines. Am J Pathol. 2008;172:367-377. (Pubitemid 351282024)
25. Sheetz MP, Felsenfeld DP, Galbraith CG. Cell migration: regulation of force on extracellular-matrix-integrin complexes. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:51-54. (Pubitemid 28056811)
26. Van Haastert PJ, Devreotes PN. Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:626-634.
27. Bershadsky AD, Balaban NQ, Geiger B. Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003;19:677-695.
28. Martin P. Wound healing-aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science. 1997;276:75-81. (Pubitemid 27161246)
29. Raupach C, Zitterbart DP, Mierke CT, Metzner C, Muller FA, Fabry B. Stress fluctuations and motion of cytoskeletal-bound markers. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007;76:011918. (Pubitemid 47173207)
30. Müller O, Gaub H, Bärmann M, Sackmann E. Viscoelastic moduli of sterically and chemically cross-linked actin networks in the dilute to semidilute regime: measurements by an oscillating disk rheometer. Macromolecules. 1991;24:3111-3120. (Pubitemid 21682689)
31. Butler JP, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Fabry B, Fredberg JJ. Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;282:C595-C605. (Pubitemid 34663176)
32. Landau L, Lifshitz E. Theory of Elasticity. Oxford, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1986.
33. Sabass B, Gardel ML, Waterman CM, Schwarz US. High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. Biophys J. 2008;94:207-220.
34. Dembo M, Wang YL. Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys J. 1999;76:2307-2316. (Pubitemid 29266384)
35. Young B, Lowe S, Stevens A, Heath J. Wheater's Functional Histology: A Text and Colour Atlas. 5th Ed. New York, NY: Churchill-Livingstone; 2006: 49-64.
36. Zaman MH, Trapani LM, Sieminski AL, et al. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:10889-10894.
37. Ridley AJ, Schwartz MA, Burridge K, et al. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science. 2003;302:1704-1709. (Pubitemid 37505725)
38. Heit B, Liu L, Colarusso P, Puri KD, Kubes P. PI3K accelerates, but is not required for, neutrophil chemotaxis to fMLP. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:205-214. (Pubitemid 351228453)
39. Sai J, Raman D, Liu Y, Wikswo J, Richmond A. Parallel phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent and Src-dependent pathways lead to CXCL8-mediated Rac2 activation and chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:26538-26547.
40. Peyton SR, Putnam AJ. Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion. J Cell Physiol. 2005;204:198-209.
41. Kong HJ, Polte TR, Alsberg E, Mooney DJ. FRET measurements of cell-traction forces and nanoscale clustering of adhesion ligands varied by substrate stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:4300-4305. (Pubitemid 40397106)
42. Ghibaudo M, Saez A, Trichet L, et al. Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions. Soft Matter. 2008;4:1836-1843.
43. Wong J, Velasco A, Rajagopalan P, Pham Q. Directed movement of vascular smooth muscle cells on gradient-compliant hydrogels. Langmuir. 2003;19:1908-1913.
44. Gupton SL, Waterman-Storer CM. Spatiotemporal feedback between actomyosin and focal-adhesion systems optimizes rapid cell migration. Cell. 2006;125:1361-1374.
45. Iwasaki T, Wang YL. Cytoplasmic force gradient in migrating adhesive cells. Biophys J. 2008;94:L35-L37.
46. Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell. 1996;84:359-369.
47. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science. 2001;294:1708-1712. (Pubitemid 33104840)
48. Tzima E, Irani-Tehrani M, Kiosses WB, et al. A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature. 2005;437:426-431. (Pubitemid 41613506)
49. Hughes PE, Pfaff M. Integrin affinity modulation. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:359-364.