Combining cognitive and affective support in order to promote learning

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 495-505

  Huk, Thomas ^a   Ludwigs, Stefan ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b University of Applied Sciecens   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive Load Theory; Germane cognitive load; Goal based learning; Self explanation

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349304394     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aleven V., Elmar S., Schworm S., Fischer F., and Wallace R. Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research 73 2 (2003) 277-320
2. Alexander P.A., and Murphy P.K. Profiling the differences in students' knowledge, interest, and strategic processing. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 (1998) 435-447
3. Astleitner H., and Wiesner C. An integrated model of multimedia learning and motivation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13 (2004) 3-22
4. Boekaerts M. Towards a model that integrates motivation, affect and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II Part 2 (2003) 173-189
5. Bonato M. Wissensstrukturierung mittels Struktur-Lege-Techniken. Eine graphentheoretische Analyse von Wissensnetzen (Knowledge structuring via structure-laying-technique. An analysis of knowledge nets) (1990), Lang, Frankfurt A/M, Germany
6. Campbell R., and Monson D. Building a goal-based-scenario learning environment. Educational Technology 34 9 (1994) 9-14
7. Catrambone R., and Yuasa M. Acquisition of procedures: The effects of example elaborations and active learning exercises. Learning and Instruction 16 (2006) 139-153
8. Chi M.T.H. Self-explaining expository texts: The dual process of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In: Glaser R. (Ed). Advances in instructional psychology (2000), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 161-238
9. Chiu M.M., and Xihua Z. Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries. Learning and Instruction 18 (2008) 321-336
10. DeLeeuw K.E., and Mayer R.E. A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology 100 1 (2008) 223-234
11. Gerjets P., and Scheiter K. Goal configurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertext-based instruction. Educational Psychologist 38 1 (2003) 33-41
12. Garner R., Gillingham M., and White C. Effects of "seductive details" on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction 6 (1989) 41-57
13. Gerjets P., Scheiter K., and Catrambone R. Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load: Molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures. Instructional Science 32 (2004) 33-58
14. Gerjets P., Scheiter K., and Catrambone R. Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations?. Learning and Instruction 16 (2006) 104-121
15. van Gog T., Ericsson K.A., Rikers R.M.J.P., and Paas F. Instructional design for advanced learners: Establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice. Educational Technology Research and Development 53 3 (2005) 73-81
16. van Gog T., van Merriënboer J.J.G., and Paas F. Effects of studying sequences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency. Learning and Instruction 18 3 (2008) 211-222
17. Harp S.F., and Mayer R.E. How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 60 (1998) 414-434
18. Heiss A., Eckhardt A., and Schnotz W. Selbst- und Fremdsteuerung beim Lernen mit Hypermedien (Learning with hypermedia: Self-monitoring and external control). Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie 17 3/4 (2003) 211-220
19. Hidi S. Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review 1 (2006) 69-82
20. Hidi S., and Renninger A. The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist 41 (2006) 111-127
21. Huk T., Bieger S., Ohrmann S., and Weigel B. Computer animations in science education: Is background music beneficial or detrimental?. In: Cantoni L., and McLoughlin C. (Eds). ED-MEDIA - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (2004), AACE, Chesapeake, VA 4227-4234
22. Jonassen D.H., Beissner K., and Yacci M. Structural knowledge. techniques for representing, conveying and acquiring structural knowledge (1993), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
23. de Jong T. The guided discovery principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 215-228
24. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning (2001), Cambridge University Press, New York
25. Mayer R.E. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?. American Psychologist 59 (2004) 14-19
26. Mayer R.E. Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 169-182
27. Mayer R.E. Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity principle. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 183-200
28. Mayer R.E., Heiser J., and Lonn S. Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 1 (2001) 187-198
29. van Merriënboer J.J.G., Kirschner P.A., and Kester L. Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist 38 1 (2003) 5-13
30. van Merriënboer J.J.G., Schuurman J.G., de Croock M.B.M., and Paas F.G.W.C. Redirecting learners' attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction 12 1 (2002) 11-37
31. Moreno R., and Mayer R. Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review 19 3 (2007) 309-326
32. Paas F., Tuovinen J.E., van Merriënboer J.J.G., and Darabi A.A. A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 53 3 (2005) 25-34
33. Pekrun R., Goetz T., Titz W., and Perry R. Academic emotions in students`self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 37 2 (2002) 91-105
34. R-Development-Core-Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2007), R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
35. Reinking D., Hayes D.A., and McEneaney J.E. Good and poor readers use of explicitly cued graphic aids. Journal of Reading Behavior 20 (1988) 229-247
36. Renkl A. Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science 21 (1997) 1-29
37. Roy M., and Chi M.T.H. The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 271-286
38. Schank R.C. Goal-based scenarios: A radical look at education. Journal of the Learning Sciences 3 4 (1994) 429-453
39. Schnotz W. An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 49-69
40. Sweller J. Instructional design in technical areas (1999), ACER Press, Camberwell, Australia
41. Sweller J. Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 19-30
42. Sweller J. The worked-example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction 16 2 (2006) 165-169
43. Whelan R.R. Neuroimaging of cognitive load in instructional multimedia. Educational Research Review 2 1 (2007) 1-12