Correlations among fertility components can maintain mixed mating in plants

American Naturalist

Volumn 173, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-11

  Johnston, Mark O ^a   Porcher, Emmanuelle ^b   Cheptou, Pierre Olivier ^b   Eckert, Christopher G ^c   Elle, Elizabeth ^d   Geber, Monica A ^e   Kalisz, Susan ^f   Kelly, John K ^g   Moeller, David A ^h   Vallejo Marín, Mario ⁱ   Winn, Alice A ^j  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^h University of Kansas ^*  (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^j FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Functional relation; Inbreeding depression; Pollen discounting; Selective constraint; Self fertilization; Trade off

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); FITNESS; MATING BEHAVIOR; POLLEN; TRADE-OFF;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; INBREEDING; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION;

ANGIOSPERMS; EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; INBREEDING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLLINATION;

SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 58749103844     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/593705     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arnold, S. J. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. American Naturalist 140(suppl.):S85-S107.
2. Bakker, E. G., E. A. Stahl, C. Toomajian, M. Nordborg, M. Kreitman, and J. Bergelson. 2006. Distribution of genetic variation within and among local populations of Arabidopsis thaliana over its species range. Molecular Ecology 15:1405-1418.
3. Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3:274-284.
4. Blows, M. W., and R. Brooks. 2003. Measuring nonlinear selection. American Naturalist 162:815-820.
5. Charlesworth, D. 2006. Evolution of plant breeding systems. Current Biology 16:R726-R735.
6. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:237-268.
7. -. 1995. Quantitative genetics in plants: the effect of the breeding system on genetic variability. Evolution 49:911-920.
8. Charlesworth, D., M. T. Morgan, and B. Charlesworth. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44:1469-1489.
9. Cheptou, P.-O. 2004. Allee effect and self-fertilization in hermaphrodites: reproductive assurance in demographically stable populations. Evolution 58:2613-2621.
10. Eckert, C. G. 2000. Contributions of autogamy and geitonogamy to self-fertilization in a mass-flowering, clonal plant. Ecology 81:532-542.
11. Fishman, L. 2000. Pollen discounting and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 54:1558-1565.
12. Ghalambor, C. K., D. N. Reznick, and J. A. Walker. 2004. Constraints on adaptive evolution: the functional trade-off between reproduction and fast-start swimming performance in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). American Naturalist 164:38-50.
13. Goodwillie, C., S. Kalisz, and C. G. Eckert. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36:47-79.
14. Grant, V. 1958. The regulation of recombination in plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 23:337-363.
15. Harder, L. D., and J. D. Thomson. 1989. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. American Naturalist 133:323-344.
16. Harder, L. D., and W. G. Wilson. 1998. A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution. American Naturalist 152:684-695.
17. Harder, L. D., S. C. H. Barrett, and W. W. Cole. 2000. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267:315-320.
18. Harder, L. D., S. A. Richards, and M. B. Routley. 2008. Effects of reproductive compensation, gamete discounting and reproductive assurance on mating-system diversity in hermaphrodites. Evolution 62:157-172.
19. Herlihy, C. R., and C. G. Eckert. 2002. Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature 416:320-323.
20. Holsinger, K. E. 1988. Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating system evolution. Evolution 42:1235-1244.
21. Holsinger, K. E., and J. D. Thomson. 1994. Pollen discounting in Erythronium grandiflorum: mass-action estimates from pollen transfer dynamics. American Naturalist 144:799-812.
22. Holsinger, K. E., M. W. Feldman, and F. B. Christiansen. 1984. The evolution of self-fertilization in plants: a population genetic model. American Naturalist 124:446-453.
23. Igic, B., L. Bohs, and J. R. Kohn. 2004. Historical inferences from the self-incompatibility locus. New Phytologist 161:97-105.
24. Ingvarsson, P. K. 2002. A metapopulation perspective on genetic diversity and differentiation in partially self-fertilizing plants. Evolution 56:2368-2373.
25. Jain, S. K. 1976. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7:469-495.
26. Jersakova, J., and S. D. Johnson. 2007. Protandry promotes male pollination success in a moth-pollinated orchid. Functional Ecology 21:496-504.
27. Johnston, M. O. 1998. Evolution of intermediate selfing rates in plants: pollination ecology versus deleterious mutations. Genetica 103:267-278.
28. Karron, J. D., R. J. Mitchell, K. G. Holmquist, J. M. Bell, and B. Funk. 2004. The influence of floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 92:242-248.
29. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157:245-261.
30. Kohn, J. R., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1994. Pollen discounting and the spread of a selfing variant in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata: evidence from experimental populations. Evolution 48:1576-1594.
31. Kondrashov, A. S. 1985. Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. II. Facultative apomixis and selfing. Genetics 111:635-653.
32. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
33. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113:67-97.
34. -. 1992. Self-fertilization and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153:370-380.
35. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
36. Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Burger. 1995. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. American Naturalist 146:489-518.
37. Maynard Smith, J., R. Burian, S. Kauffman, P. Alberch, J. Campbell, B. Goodwin, R. Lande, D. Raup, and L. Wolpert. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution: a perspective from the Mountain Lake Conference on Development and Evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology 60:265-287.
38. Perrin, N., and J. Travis. 1992. On the use of constraints in evolutionary biology and some allergic reactions to them. Functional Ecology 6:361-363.
39. Porcher, E., and R. Lande. 2005a. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:497-508.
40. -. 2005b. Reproductive compensation in the evolution of plant mating systems. New Phytologist 166:673-684.
41. Rademaker, M. C. J., and T. J. De Jong. 1998. Effects of flower number on estimated pollen transfer in natural populations of three hermaphroditic species: an experiment with fluorescent dye. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11:623-641.
42. Schemske, D. W., and R. Lande. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39:41-52.
43. Schoen, D. J., M. O. Johnston, A.-M. L'Heureux, and J. V. Marsolais. 1997. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51:1090-1099.
44. Stebbins, G. L. 1957. Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. American Naturalist 91:337-354.
45. Takebayashi, N., and P. Morrell. 2001. Is self-fertilization a dead end? revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach. American Journal of Botany 88:1143-1150.
46. Uyenoyama, M. K., and D. M. Waller. 1991. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation-selection balance at one and two loci. Theoretical Population Biology 40:14-46.
47. Uyenoyama, M. K., K. E. Holsinger, and D. M. Waller. 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 9:327-381.
48. van Kleunen, M., and K. Ritland. 2004. Predicting evolution of floral traits associated with mating system in a natural plant population. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17:1389-1399.
49. Williams, C. F. 2007. Effects of floral display size and biparental inbreeding on outcrossing rates in Delphinium barbeyi (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany 94:1696-1705.
50. Wyatt, R. 1988. Phylogenetic aspects of the evolution of self-pollination. Pages 109-131 in L. D. Gottlieb and S. K. Jain, eds. Plant evolutionary biology. Chapman & Hall, London.