Interaction-independent sexual selection and the mechanisms of sexual selection

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 8-18

  Murphy, Christopher G ^a  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interaction dependent sexual selection; Interaction independent sexual selection; Intersexual competition; Mate choice; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

MATING SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION;

EID: 0031901337     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05133.x     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. ANDERSSON, M. 1982. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818-820.
2. _. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. ANDERSSON, S., AND M. ANDERSSON. 1994. Tail ornamentation, size dimorphism and wing length in the genus Eupectes (Ploceinae). Auk 111:80-86.
4. ARAK, A. 1983a. Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians. Pp. 181-210 in P. Bateson, ed. Mate choice. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
5. _. 1983b. Sexual selection by male-male competition in natterjack toad choruses. Nature 306:261-262.
6. ARNOLD, S. J. 1983. Sexual selection: the interface between theory and empiricism. Pp. 67-107 in P. Bateson, ed. Mate choice. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
7. _. 1994. Is there a unifying concept of sexual selection that applies to both plants and animals? Am. Nat. 144 (suppl.):S1-S12.
8. ARNOLD, S. J., AND D. DUVALL. 1994. Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143:317-348.
9. BALMFORD, A., I. L. JONES, AND A. L. R. THOMAS. 1994. How to compensate for costly sexually selected tails: the origin of sexually dimorphic wings in long-tailed birds. Evolution 48:1062-1070.
10. BIRKHEAD, T. R., AND F. M. HUNTER. 1990. Mechanisms of sperm competition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5:48-52.
11. BRADBURY, J. W., AND N. B. DAVIES. 1987. Relative roles of intra-and intersexual selection. Pp. 143-163 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
12. BRADBURY, J. W., AND R. M. GIBSON. 1983. Leks and mate choice. Pp. 109-138 in P. Bateson, ed. Mate choice. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
13. BROWN, J. L. 1983. Intersexual selection. Nature 302:472.
14. CHARLESWORTH, D., D. W. SCHEMSKE, AND V. L. SORK. 1987. The evolution of plant reproductive structures: sexual versus natural selection. Pp. 317-335 in S. C. Stearns, ed. The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland.
15. CONNER, J. K. 1996. Understanding natural selection: an approach integrating selection gradients, multiplicative fitness components, and path analysis. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 8:387-397.
16. CONNER, J. K., S. RUSH, S. KERCHER, AND P. JENNETTEN. 1996. Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). II. Selection through lifetime male and total fitness. Evolution 50:1137-1146.
17. DARWIN, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray, London.
18. _. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
19. DEUTSCH, C. J., M. P. HALEY, AND B. J. LE BOEUF. 1990. Reproductive effort of male northern elephant seals: estimates from mass loss. Can. J. Zool. 68:2580-2593.
20. DRONEY, D. C. 1992. Sexual selection in a lekking Hawaiian Drosophila: the roles of male competition and female choice in mating success. Anim. Behav. 44:1007-1020.
21. DYSON, M. L., N. I. PASSMORE, P. J. BISHOP, AND S. P. HENZI. 1992. Male behavior and correlates of mating success in a natural population of African painted reed frogs (Hyperolius marmoratus). Herpetologica 48:236-246.
22. ENDLER, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
23. _. 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139 (suppl.):S125-S153.
24. FISHER, R. A. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. 2d ed. Dover, New York
25. FORREST, T. G., AND R. RASPERT. 1994. Models of female choice in acoustic communication. Behav. Ecol. 5:293-303.
26. GERHARDT, H. C., R. E. DANIEL, S. A. PERRILL, AND S. SCHRAMM. 1987. Mating behavior and male mating success in the green treefrog. Anim. Behav. 35:1490-1503.
27. GHISELIN, M. T. 1974. The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
28. GIBSON, R. M., AND F. E. GUINNESS. 1980. Behavioural factors affecting male reproductive success in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Anim. Behav. 28:1163-1174.
29. GOMENDIO, M., AND E. R. S. ROLDAN. 1993. Mechanisms of sperm competition: linking physiology and behavioural ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:95-104.
30. GRANT, V. 1995. Sexual selection in plants: pros and con. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 92:1247-1250.
31. HALLIDAY, T. R. 1983. The study of mate choice. Pp. 3-32 in P. Bateson, ed. Mate choice. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
32. _. 1993. Sex and evolution. Pp. 151-192. in P. J. B. Slater and T. R. Halliday, eds. Behaviour and evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
33. HARDER, L. D., AND J. D. THOMSON. 1989. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. Am. Nat. 133:323-344.
34. HARVEY, P. H., AND J. W. BRADBURY. 1991. Sexual selection. Pp. 203-233 in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. 3d ed. Blackwell, Oxford.
35. HEDENSTÖM, A., AND A. P. MØLLER. 1992. Morphological adaptations to song flight in passerine birds: a comparative study. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 247:183-187.
36. JACOBSON, S. K. 1985. Reproductive behavior and male mating success in two species of glass frogs (Centrolenidae). Herpetologica 41:396-404.
37. KIRKPATRICK, M., AND M. J. RYAN. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33-38.
38. KOENIG, W. D., AND S. S. ALBANO. 1986. On the measurement of sexual selection. Am. Nat. 127:403-409.
39. LAMBRACHTS, M., AND A. A. DHONDT. 1988. The anti-exhaustion hypothesis: a new hypothesis to explain song performance and song switching in the great tit. Anim. Behav. 36:327-334.
40. LE BOEUF, B. J. 1974. Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. Am. Zool. 14:163-76.
41. LEVITAN, D. R., AND C. PETERSEN. 1995. Sperm limiation in the sea. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:228-321.
42. LINDSTEDT, S. L., AND M. S. BOYCE. 1985. Seasonality, fasting endurance, and body size in mammals. Am. Nat. 125:873-878.
43. LLOYD, D. G., AND J. M. A. YATES. 1982. Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphrodite plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution 36:903-911.
44. LYONS, E. E., N. M. WASER, M. V. PRICE, J. ANTONOVICS, AND A. F. MOTTEN. 1989. Sources of variation in plant reproductive success and implications for concepts of sexual selection. Am. Nat. 134:409-433.
45. MARSHALL, D. L., AND M. W. FOLSOM. 1991. Mate choice in plants: an anatomical to population perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22:37-63.
46. MOORE, A. J. 1990. The evolution of sexual dimorphism by sexual selection: the separate effects of intrasexual selection and intersexual selection. Evolution. 44:315-331.
47. MORGAN, M. T. 1994. Models of sexual selection in hermaphrodites, especially in plants. Am. Nat. 144 (suppl.):S100-S125.
48. MURPHY, C. G. 1994a. Determinants of chorus tenure in the barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34:285-295.
49. _. 1994b. Chorus tenure of male barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa). Anim. Behav. 48:763-777.
50. OTTE, D. 1979. Historical development of sexual selection theory. Pp. 1-18 in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
51. PARKER, G. A. 1978a. Searching for mates. Pp. 214-244 in J.R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. 1st ed. Blackwell, London.
52. _. 1978b. Evolution of competitive mate searching. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 23:173-196.
53. _. 1982. Phenotype-limited evolutionary stable strategies. Pp. 173-202 in B. R. Bertram, T. H. Glutton-Brock, R. I. M. Dunbar, D. I. Rubenstein, and R. Wrangham, eds. Current problems in sociobiology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
54. PARTRIDGE, L., AND T. HALLIDAY. 1984. Mating patterns and mate choice. Pp. 222-250 in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3d ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
55. PASSMORE, N. I., P. H. BISHOP, AND N. CAITHNESS. 1992. Calling behaviour influences mating success in male painted reed frogs, Hyperolius marmoratus. Ethology 92:227-241.
56. QUELLER, D. C. 1987. Sexual selection in flowering plants. Pp. 165-179 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
57. RYAN, M. J. 1985. The túngara frog: a study in sexual selection and communication. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
58. SAVALLI, U. M. 1994. Tail length affects territory ownership in the yellow-shouldered widowbird. Anim. Behav. 48:105-111.
59. SCHROEDER, M. A., AND G. C. WHITE. 1993. Dispersion of greater prairie chicken nests in relation to lek location: evaluation of the hot-spot hypothesis of lek evolution. Behav. Ecol. 4:266-270.
60. SCHWAGMEYER, P. L. 1988. Scramble-competition polygyny in an asocial mammal: male mobility and mating success. Am. Nat. 131:885-892.
61. SCHWAGMEYER, P. L., AND G. A. PARKER. 1987. Queuing for mates in thirteen-lined ground squirrels. Anim. Behav. 35:1015-1025.
62. SCHWAGMEYER, P. L., AND S. J. WOOTNER. 1986. Scramble competition polygyny in thirteen-lined ground squirrels: the relative contributions of overt conflict and competitive mate searching. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19:359-364.
63. SMUTS, B. B., AND R. W. SMUTS. 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Pp. 1-63 in P. J. Slater, J. S. Rosenblatt, C. T. Snowdon, and M. Milinski, eds. Advances in the study of behavior. Vol. 22. Academic Press, New York.
64. SNOW, A. A. 1994. Postpollination selection and male fitness in plants. Am. Nat. 144 (suppl.):S69-S83.
65. SNOW, A. A., AND T. P. SPIRA. 1991. Pollen vigour and the potential for sexual selection in plants. Nature 352:796-797.
66. STANTON, M. L. 1994. Male-male competition during pollination in plant populations. Am. Nat. 144 (suppl.):S40-S68.
67. STEPHENSON, A. G., AND R. I. BERTIN. 1983. Male competition, female choice, and sexual selection in plants. Pp. 109-149 in L. Real, ed. Pollination Biology. Academic Press, New York.
68. SULLIVAN, B. K., AND S. H. HINSHAW. 1992. Female choice and selection of male calling behaviour in the grey treefrog Hyla versicolor. Anim. Behav. 44:733-744.
69. SUTHERLAND, W. J. 1987. Random and deterministic components of mating success. Pp. 209-219 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
70. THORNHILL, R., AND J. ALCOCK. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
71. WAAGE, J. K. 1979. Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203:916-918.
72. WALKER, T. J. 1983. Diel patterns of calling in nocturnal Orthoptera. Pp. 45-72 in D. T. Gwynne and G. K. Morris, eds. Orthopteran mating systems: sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
73. WEBSTER, M. S., S. PRUETT-JONES, D. F. WESTNEAT, S. J. ARNOLD. 1996. Measuring the effects of pairing success, extra-pair copulations, and mate quality on the opportunity for sexual selection. Evolution 49:1147-1157.
74. WESTCOTT, D. A. 1997. Lek locations and patterns of female movement and distribution in a Neotropical frugivorous bird. Anim. Behav. 53:235-247.
75. WEST-EBERHARD, M. J. 1979. Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proc. Am. Philo. Soc. 123:222-234.
76. _. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155-183.
77. WEST-EBERHARD, M. J., J. W. BRADBURY, N. B. DAVIES, P.-H. GOUYON., P. HAMMERSTEIN, B. KÖNIG, G. A. PARKER, D. C. QUELLER, N. SACHSER, T. SLAGSVOLD, F. TRILLMICH, AND C. VOGEL. 1987. Conflicts between and within the sexes in sexual selection. Pp. 143-163 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
78. WTLEY, R. H., AND J. POSTON. 1996. Indirect mate choice, compeition for mates and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50: 1371-1381.
79. WILLSON, M. F. 1990. Sexual selection in plants and animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5:210-214.
80. _. 1994. Sexual selection in plants: perspectives and overview. Am. Nat. 144 (suppl.):S13-S39.
81. WILLSON, M. F., AND N. T. BURLEY. 1983. Mate choice in plants. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
82. ZAHAVI, A. 1991. On the definition of sexual selection, Fisher's model, and the evolution of waste and of signals in general. Anim. Behav. 42:501-503.
83. _. 1997. A reply to John. Anim. Behav. 54:228-229.