Synthetic morphology using alternative inputs

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 9, 2009, Pages

  Tanaka, Hiromasa ^a   Yi, Tau Mu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATING HORMONE ALPHA FACTOR; MATING HORMONE ALPHA FACTOR RECEPTOR; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR FUS3P; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR STE11P; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR STE12P; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR STE4P; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR STE5P; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR STE7P; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN BETA SUBUNIT; PEPTIDE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCING ADAPTOR PROTEIN; STE4 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; STE5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ALTERNATIVE INPUT METHOD; ARTICLE; CELL POLARITY; CELL STIMULATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE DELETION; GENETIC MANIPULATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; MATING SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES CONCERNING CELLS; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; YEAST CELL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SHAPE; CELL SIZE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETICS; MATING FACTOR; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SHAPE; CELL SIZE; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; GTP-BINDING PROTEIN BETA SUBUNITS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PEPTIDES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 70349177735     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006946     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Yeh BJ, Lim WA (2007) Synthetic biology: lessons from the history of synthetic organic chemistry. Nat Chem Biol 3: 521-525.
2. Dohlman HG, Thorner JW (2001) Regulation of G protein-initiated signal transduction in yeast: paradigms and principles. Annu Rev Biochem 70: 703-754.
3. Pryciak PM, Huntress FA (1998) Membrane recruitment of the kinase cascade scaffold protein Ste5 by the Gbetagamma complex underlies activation of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Genes Dev 12: 2684-2697.
4. Elion EA (2001) The Ste5p scaffold. J Cell Sci 114: 3967-3978.
5. Schwartz MA, Madhani HD (2004) Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet 38: 725-748.
6. Pruyne D, Bretscher A (2000) Polarization of cell growth in yeast. I. Establishment and maintenance of polarity states. J Cell Sci 113 (Pt 3): 365-375.
7. Bucking-Throm E, Duntze W, Hartwell LH, Manney TR (1973) Reversible arrest of haploid yeast cells in the initiation of DNA synthesis by a diffusible sex factor. Exp Cell Res 76: 99-110.
8. Bidlingmaier S, Snyder M (2004) Regulation of polarized growth initiation and termination cycles by the polarisome and Cdc42 regulators. J Cell Biol 164: 207-218.
9. Hilioti Z, Sabbagh W, Jr., Paliwal S, Bergmann A, Goncalves MD, et al. (2008) Oscillatory Phosphorylation of Yeast Fus3 MAP Kinase Controls Periodic Gene Expression and Morphogenesis. Curr Biol 18: 1700-1706.
10. Kurjan J (1985) Alpha-factor structural gene mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects on alpha-factor production and mating. Mol Cell Biol 5: 787-796.
11. Cole GM, Stone DE, Reed SI (1990) Stoichiometry of G protein subunits affects the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromone signal transduction pathway. Mol Cell Biol 10: 510-517.
12. Whiteway M, Hougan L, Thomas DY (1990) Overexpression of the STE4 gene leads to mating response in haploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 10: 217-222.
13. Dolan JW, Fields S (1990) Overproduction of the yeast STE12 protein leads to constitutive transcriptional induction. Genes Dev 4: 492-502.
14. Konopka JB, Margarit SM, Dube P (1996) Mutation of Pro-258 in transmembrane domain 6 constitutively activates the G protein-coupled alpha-factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 6764-6769.
15. Cairns BR, Ramer SW, Kornberg RD (1992) Order of action of components in the yeast pheromone response pathway revealed with a dominant allele of the STE11 kinase and the multiple phosphorylation of the STE7 kinase. Genes Dev 6: 1305-1318.
16. Harris K, Lamson RE, Nelson B, Hughes TR, Marton MJ, et al. (2001) Role of scaffolds in MAP kinase pathway specificity revealed by custom design of pathway-dedicated signaling proteins. Curr Biol 11: 1815-1824.
17. Brill JA, Elion EA, Fink GR (1994) A role for autophosphorylation revealed by activated alleles of FUS3, the yeast MAP kinase homolog. Mol Biol Cell 5: 297-312.
18. Leeuw T, Wu C, Schrag JD, Whiteway M, Thomas DY, et al. (1998) Interaction of a G-protein beta-subunit with a conserved sequence in Ste20/PAK family protein kinases. Nature 391: 191-195.
19. Drogen F, O'Rourke SM, Stucke VM, Jaquenoud M, Neiman AM, et al. (2000) Phosphorylation of the MEKK Ste11p by the PAK-like kinase Ste20p is required for MAP kinase signaling in vivo. Curr Biol 10: 630-639.
20. Pruyne D, Bretscher A (2000) Polarization of cell growth in yeast. J Cell Sci 113 (Pt 4): 571-585.
21. Sheu YJ, Santos B, Fortin N, Costigan C, Snyder M (1998) Spa2p interacts with cell polarity proteins and signaling components involved in yeast cell morphogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 18: 4053-4069.
22. Peter M, Neiman AM, Park HO, van Lohuizen M, Herskowitz I (1996) Functional analysis of the interaction between the small GTP binding protein Cdc42 and the Ste20 protein kinase in yeast. Embo J 15: 7046-7059.
23. Dohlman HG, Song J, Ma D, Courchesne WE, Thorner J (1996) Sst2, a negative regulator of pheromone signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: expression, localization, and genetic interaction and physical association with Gpa1 (the G-protein alpha subunit). Mol Cell Biol 16: 5194-5209.
24. Ballon DR, Flanary PL, Gladue DP, Konopka JB, Dohlman HG, et al. (2006) DEP-domain-mediated regulation of GPCR signaling responses. Cell 126: 1079-1093.
25. Siekhaus DE, Drubin DG (2003) Spontaneous receptor-independent heterotrimeric G-protein signalling in an RGS mutant. Nat Cell Biol 5: 231-235.
26. Wedlich-Soldner R, Wai SC, Schmidt T, Li R (2004) Robust cell polarity is a dynamic state established by coupling transport and GTPase signaling. J Cell Biol 166: 889-900.
27. Hawkins KM, Smolke CD (2006) The regulatory roles of the galactose permease and kinase in the induction response of the GAL network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 281: 13485-13492.
28. Moore SA (1983) Comparison of dose-response curves for alpha factor-induced cell division arrest, agglutination, and projection formation of yeast cells. Implication for the mechanism of alpha factor action. J Biol Chem 258: 13849-13856.
29. Moore TI, Chou CS, Nie Q, Jeon NL, Yi TM (2008) Robust spatial sensing of mating pheromone gradients by yeast cells. PLoS One 3: e3865.
30. Wang Y, Chen W, Simpson DM, Elion EA (2005) Cdc24 regulates nuclear shuttling and recruitment of the Ste5 scaffold to a heterotrimeric G protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280: 13084-13096.
31. Chenevert J, Valtz N, Herskowitz I (1994) Identification of genes required for normal pheromone-induced cell polarization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 136: 1287-1296.
32. Giot L, Konopka JB (1997) Functional analysis of the interaction between Afr1p and the Cdc12p septin, two proteins involved in pheromone-induced morphogenesis. Mol Biol Cell 8: 987-998.
33. Bharucha JP, Larson JR, Konopka JB, Tatchell K (2008) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Afr1 protein is a protein phosphatase 1/Glc7-targeting subunit that regulates the septin cytoskeleton during mating. Eukaryot Cell 7: 1246-1255.
34. Matheos D, Metodiev M, Muller E, Stone D, Rose MD (2004) Pheromone-induced polarization is dependent on Fus3p MAPK acting through the formin Bni1p. J Cell Biology 165: 99-109.
35. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, et al. (1999) Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285: 901-906.
36. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294: 2364-2368.
37. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, et al. (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303: 808-813.
38. Sopko R, Huang D, Preston N, Chua G, Papp B, et al. (2006) Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol Cell 21: 319-330.
39. Moriya H, Shimizu-Yoshida Y, Kitano H (2006) In vivo robustness analysis of cell division cycle genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2: e111.
40. Kroll ES, Hyland KM, Hieter P, Li JJ (1996) Establishing genetic interactions by a synthetic dosage lethality phenotype. Genetics 143: 95-102.
41. Drubin DA, Way JC, Silver PA (2007) Designing biological systems. Genes Dev 21: 242-254.
42. Ohya Y, Sese J, Yukawa M, Sano F, Nakatani Y, et al. (2005) High-dimensional and large-scale phenotyping of yeast mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 19015-19020.
43. Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR, Clarke C, Kang IH, et al. (2006) CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7: R100.
44. Guthrie C, Fink GR (1991) Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. Methods Enzymol 194: 1-863.
45. Yi TM, Kitano H, Simon MI (2003) A quantitative characterization of the yeast heterotrimeric G protein cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 10764-10769.
46. Wedegaertner PB, Wilson PT, Bourne HR (1995) Lipid modifications of trimeric G proteins. J Biol Chem 270: 503-506.