Strategies for collaborative writing and phases of knowledge construction in CSCL environments

Computers and Education

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1256-1265

  Onrubia, Javier ^a   Engel, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Cooperative collaborative learning; Pedagogical issues; Post secondary education; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE/COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES; POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGIES;

CESIUM ALLOYS; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

GROUP TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 69949083406     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Barnes D. From communication to curriculum (1976), Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK
2. Bereiter C. Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist 29 1 (1994) 3-12
3. Blaye A., and Light P. Computer-based learning: The social dimensions. In: Foot H.C., Morgan M.J., and Shute R.H. (Eds). Children helping children (1990), J. Wiley & sons, Chichester 135-150
4. Cazden C.B. Classroom discourse. The language of teaching and learning (1988), Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH
5. Cerrato T. Collaborating with writing tools. An instrumental perspective on the problem of computer-supported collaborative activities. Interacting with Computers 15 (2003) 737-757
6. Chi M.T.H. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences 6 (1997) 271-315
7. Cohen E. Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research 64 (1994) 1-35
8. Cole M. Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline (1996), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
9. Coll, C., Mauri, T., & Onrubia, J. (2008a). Análisis de los usos reales de las TIC en contextos educativos formales: una aproximación sociocultural. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 10(1). Retrieved 08.08.08.
10. Coll C., Mauri T., and Onrubia J. La utilización de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en educación: del diseño tecno-pedagógico a las prácticas de uso. In: Coll C., and Monereo C. (Eds). Psicología de la educación virtual. Enseñar y aprender con las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (2008), Morata, Madrid 74-103
11. Coll C., Onrubia J., and Mauri T. Tecnología y prácticas pedagógicas: Las TIC como instrumentos de mediación de la actividad conjunta de profesores y estudiantes. Anuario de Psicología 38 3 (2007) 377-400
12. Coll C., Onrubia J., and Mauri T. Ayudar a aprender en contextos educativos: El ejercicio de la influencia educativa y el análisis de la enseñanza. Revista de Educación 346 (2008) 33-70
13. Daniels H. Vygotsky and pedagogy (2001), Routledge, New York, NY
14. De Laat, M. (2006). Networked Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands. Retrieved 08.08.08.
15. De Laat M., and Lally V. Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science 31 (2003) 7-39
16. De Laat M., and Lally V. Investigating group structure in CSCL: Some new approaches. Information Systems Frontiers 7 1 (2005) 13-25
17. De Wever B., Schellens T., Valcke M., and Van Keer H. Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers and Education 46 1 (2006) 6-28
18. Dillenbourg P. Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner P.A. (Ed). Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (2002), Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen 61-91
19. Dillenbourg, P., & Schneider, D. (1995). Collaborative learning and the Internet. ICCAI 95 article - 08 FEB 95. Retrieved 08.08.08.
20. Doise W., Mugny G., and Perret-Clermont A.N. Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations. European Journal of Social Psychology 5 (1975) 367-383
21. Engel A., and Onrubia J. Scripting computer-supported collaboration by university students. Interactive Educational Multimedia 16 (2008) 33-53
22. Engeström Y. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In: Engeström Y., Miettinen R., and Punamaki R. (Eds). Perspectives on activity theory (1999), Cambridge University Press, New York 19-38
23. Erickson F. Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure. In: Wilkinson L.Ch. (Ed). Communicating in the classroom (1982), Academic Press, New York 153-181
24. Flower L., and Hayes J. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32 4 (1981) 365-387
25. Forman E., and Cazden C. Perspectivas vigotskianas en la educciçon: El valor cognitivo de la interacción entre iguales. Infancia y Aprendizaje 27-28 (1985) 139-157
26. Garrison D.R., Anderson T., and Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 15 1 (2001)
27. Gunawardena L., Lowe C., and Anderson T. Interaction analysis of a global on-line debate and the development of a constructivist interaction analysis model for computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17 4 (1997) 395-429
28. Hara N., Bonk C.J., and Angeli C. Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science 28 (2000) 115-152
29. Harasim L. What makes online learning communities successful? The role of collaborative learning in social and intellectual development. In: Vrasidas C., and Glass G. (Eds). Distance education and distributed learning (2002), Information Age Publishing Inc., Greenwich, CT 181-200
30. Järvelä S., and Häkkinen P. Levels of web-based discussion: Theory of perspective-taking as a tool for analyzing interaction. In: Fishman B., and O'Connor-Divelbiss S. (Eds). Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (2000), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 22-26
31. Johnson D.W. Student-student interaction: The neglected variable in education. Educational Researcher 10 (1981) 5-10
32. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Researcher 49 (1979) 52-70
33. Kanuka H., and Anderson T. Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education 13 1 (1998)
34. Kirschner P.A., Martens R.L., and Strijbos J.W. CSCL in higher education? A framework for designing multiple collaborative environments. In: Strijbos J.W., Kirschner P., and Martens R. (Eds). What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands 3-30
35. Lipponen L., Rahikainen M., Lallimo J., and Hakkarainen K. Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction 13 5 (2003) 487-509
36. Lockhorst, D. (2004). Design principles for a CSCL environment in teacher training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands. Retrieved 05.05.06.
37. Lowry P.B., Curtis A., and Lowry M.R. A taxonomy of collaborative writing to improve empirical research, writing practice, and tool development. Journal of Business Communication (JBC) 41 1 (2004) 66-99
38. McLoughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2000). Cognitive engagement and higher order thinking through computer conferencing: We know why but do we know how? In A. Herrmann & M. M. Kulski (Eds), Proceedings of the 9th annual teaching learning forum, 2-4 February 2000. Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. Retrieved 03.11.06.
39. Mercer N. The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners (1995), Multilingual Matters, Clevedon
40. Mercer N. Words and minds (2000), Routledge, London
41. Miyake N. Constructive interaction and the iterative process of understanding. Cognitive Science 10 2 (1986) 151-177
42. Muukkonen H., Hakkarainen K., and Lakkala M. Technology-mediation and tutoring: How do they shape progressive inquirí discourse?. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 4 (2004) 527-565
43. Newman D., Griffin P., and Cole M. The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school (1989), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
44. Onrubia. J. (2005). Aprender y enseñar en entornos virtuales de enseñanza y aprendizaje: actividad conjunta, ayuda pedagógica y construcción del conocimiento. RED: Revista de Educación a Distancia, monográfico II. Retrieved 08.08.08.
45. Rourke L., Anderson T., Garrison D.R., and Archer W. Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12 (2001) 8-22
46. Saunders W. Collaborative writing tasks and peer interaction. International Journal of Educational Research 13 (1989) 101-112
47. Scardamalia M., and Bereiter C. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3 3 (1994) 265-283
48. Scardamalia M., and Bereiter C. Knowledge building. In: Guthrie J.W. (Ed). Encyclopedia of education. 2nd ed. (2003), Macmillan Reference, USA, New York 1370-1373
49. Schellens T., and Valcke M. Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing?. Computers in Human Behavior 21 (2005) 957-975
50. Schrire S. Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers and Education 46 1 (2006) 49-70
51. Selman R.L. The growth of interpersonal understanding (1980), Academic Press, New York
52. Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition: The collaborative locus of agency in CSCL. In T. Koschmann, D. D Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of The 2005 Conference on Computer Support For Collaborative Learning. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! (pp. 632-640). Mahwan, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Stahl G., Koschmann T., and Suthers D. Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In: Sawyer R.K. (Ed). Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 409-426
54. Stodolsky S.S. The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies (1988), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
55. Strijbos J.W., Martens R.L., and Jochems W.M.G. Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers and Education 42 (2004) 403-424
56. Tharp R.G., Estrada P., Stoll Dalton S., and Yamauchi L.A. Teaching transformed. Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony (2000), Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado
57. Van Drie J., Van Boxtel C., Jaspers J., and Kanselaar G. Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computer in Human Behavior 21 (2005) 575-602
58. Veldhuis-Diermanse, A. E. (2002). CSCLearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Wageningen University, The Netherlands. http://www.gcw.nl/dissertations/3187/dis3187.pdf Retrieved 15.08.04.
59. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (1978), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
60. Wallace R.M. Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and student. Education Communication and Information 3 2 (2003) 241-280
61. Webb N.M. Predicting learning form student interaction: Defining the interaction variables. Educational Psychologist 18 (1983) 33-41
62. Webb N.M. Task related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22 5 (1991) 366-389
63. Weinberger A., and Fischer F. A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education 46 (2006) 71-95
64. Wertsch J.V. Vygotsky and the social formation of the mind (1985), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
65. Xin, M. C. (2002). Validity centred design for the domain of engaged collaborative discourse in computer conferencing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Brigham Young University, UTA, USA. Retrieved 13.12.06.
66. Yin R.K. Case study research: Design and methods (1989), Sage Publications, London