Realizing constructivist objectives through collaborative technologies: Threaded discussions

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 58-86

  Weasenforth, Donald ^a   Biesenbach Lucas, Sigrun ^b   Meloni, Christine ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042544786     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. American Psychological Association. (1997, November). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school redesign and reform. Retrieved February 10, 2001, from the American Psychological Association Web site: http://www.apa.org/ed/ lcp.html
2. Bailey, M. L., & Luetkehans, L. (1998). Ten great tips for facilitating virtual learning teams. In Distance Learning '98: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning (pp. 19-25). Madison, WI. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED422838)
3. Bannon, L. J. (1995). Issues in computer supported collaborative learning. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 267-281). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
4. nd ed., pp. 100-112). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
5. Benbunan-Fich, R., & Hiltz, S. R. (1999). Impacts of asynchronous learning networks on individual and group problem solving: A field experiment. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 409-426.
6. Berge, Z. (1998). Changing roles of teachers and learners are transforming the online classroom. Retrieved December 10, 1999, from the ONLINE-ED Web site: http://www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/ online-ed/mailouts/1998/aug30.html
7. Berge, Z., & Collins, M. (1993). Computer conferencing and online education. The Arachnet Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture, 1(3). Retrieved May 20, 2001 from http://www.emoderators.com/papers/ bergev1n3.html
8. Berge, Z., & Collins, M. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom in distance learning. Computer-Mediated Communication Magazine, 2(4). Retrieved May 20, 2001, from http://www.ibiblio.org/cmc/mag/1995/apr/berge.html.
9. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
10. Bonk, C., & King, K. (Eds.). (1998). Electronic collaborators. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Bonk, C., & Cunningham, D. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. Bonk & K. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators (p. 25-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 19-43. Retrieved June 29, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/chapelle/ default.html
13. Chong, S-M. (1998). Models of asynchronous computer conferencing for collaborative learning in large college classes. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators (pp. 157-182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20.
15. Collins, M., & Berge, Z. (1996). Facilitating interaction in computer mediated online courses. Retrieved June 15, 2000, from http://www.emoderators.com/moderators/flcc.html
16. Davis, B., & Thiede, R. (2000). Writing into change: Style shifting in asynchronous electronic discourse. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 87-120). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. DeLoach, S. B., & Greenlaw, S. A. (2002). Do electronic discussions create critical-thinking spillovers? Unpublished manuscript.
18. Gamas, W., & Solberg, B. (1997). Classroom collaboration in cyberspace. Retrieved December 4, 2000, from http://www.coe.uh.edu/insite/elec_pub/HTML1997/de_gama.htm (This site was not working at publication time.)
19. Greenlaw, S. A., & DeLoach, S. B. (in press). Teaching critical thinking with electronic discussion. Journal of Economic Education.
20. Hutton, S. (1999, November). Course design strategies - Traditional versus on-line. What transfers? What doesn't? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Adult and Continuing Education, Phoenix, AZ. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430115)
21. Irvine, S. E. (2000). What are we talking about? The impact of computer-mediated communication on student learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444494)
22. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Technology as cognitive tools: Learners as designers. IT Forum Paper #1. Retrieved May 30, 2000, from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper1/paper1.html
23. Kamhi-Stein, L. (2000a). Adapting US-based TESOL education to meet the needs of nonnative English speakers. TESOL Journal, 9(3), 10-14.
24. Kamhi-Stein, L. (2000b). Looking to the future of TESOL teacher education: Web-based bulletin board discussions in a methods course. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 423-455.
25. Killion, J. (1998). Establishing a community in a virtual classroom. Retrieved December 4, 2000, from http://leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu/org/tcc_conf97/pres/killion.html
26. Knowlton, D., Knowlton, H., & Davis, C. (2000). The whys and hows of online discussion. Syllabus, 13(10), 54-58.
27. Korenman, J., & Wyatt, N. (1996). Group dynamics in an email forum. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computermediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 225-242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. nd ed.). New York: Grove Press.
29. Lamy, M-N., & Goodfellow, R. (1999). "Reflective conversation" in the virtual language classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 43-61. Retrieved June 29, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol2num2/article2/
30. Lang, D. (2000, September). Critical thinking in Web courses: An oxymoron? Syllabus, 14(2), 20-24.
31. MacKinley, K. (1999, September 6). Planning to use e-mail to support the learning process? Retrieved December 10, 1999, from the ONLINE-ED Web site: http://www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/online-ed/ mailouts/1999/Sept6.html
32. Merron, J. (1998). Managing a Web-based literature course for undergraduates. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 1(4). Retrieved October 26, 2000, from http://www.westga.edu/ ∼distance/merron14.html
33. Muirhead, B. (2000). Enhancing social interaction in computer-mediated distance education. Educational Technology & Society, 3(4). Retrieved June 29, 2001, from http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_4_2000/ discuss_august2000.html
34. Müller-Hartmann, A. (2000). The role of tasks in promoting intercultural learning in electronic learning networks. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 129-147. Retrieved June 29, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num2/muller/default.html
35. Nunan, D. (1999a). A foot in the world of ideas: Graduate study through the Internet. Language Learning and Technology, 3(1), 52-74. Retrieved June 29, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/nunan/
36. Nunan, D. (1999b). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
37. Ocker, R. J., & Yaverbaum, G. J. (1999). Asynchronous computer-mediated communication versus faceto-face collaboration: Results on student learning, quality, and satisfaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8(5), 427-440.
38. O'Malley, C. (1995). Designing computer support for collaborative learning. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 283-297). New York: Springer-Verlag.
39. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-93. Retrieved June 29, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/
40. Parker, M. J. (1999). Web-based extended learning through discussion forums. Research paper: Connecting technology to teaching and learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444455).
41. Peirce, W. (2000, September). Online strategies for teaching thinking. Syllabus, 14(2), pp. 21, 24.
42. Peters, K. (2000, August 29). Concrete steps for on-line discussion. Retrieved September 19, 2000, from the OTL Newsletter: http://booboo.webct.com/otln/Asynchronous_Strategies.htm
43. Prometheus 3.0-4.7. (1998-2001). Blackboard.com [Online courses server software].
44. Richardson, J. A., & Turner, A. (2000). A large-scale "local" evaluation of students' learning experiences using virtual learning environments. Educational Technology and Society, 3(4), 1-24. Retrieved November 20, 2000, from http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_4_2000/richardson.html
45. Robbins, T. (Director). (1995). Dead man walking [Film]. Hollywood, CA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
46. Scarce, R. (1997, July). Using electronic mail discussion groups to enhance students' critical thinking skills. Retrieved June 7, 2000, from The Technology Source: http://ts.mivu.org/ default.asp?show=article&id=526
47. Schallert, D. L., Benton, R. E., Dodson, M. M., Lissi, M. R., Amador, N. A., & Reed, J. H. (1998). Conversational indicators of the social construction of knowledge in oral and written classroom discussions of reading assignments. Unpublished manuscript. University of Texas at Austin.
48. Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language Learning and Technology, 5(1), 103-134. Retrieved June 29, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol5num1/Sengupta/
49. Schank, R., & Cleary, C. (1995). Engines for education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Tella, S., & Mononen-Aaltonen, M. (1998). Developing dialogic communication culture in media education: Integrating dialogism and technology. Helsinki: Media Education Publications 7. Retrieved February 10, 1999, from http://www.helsinki.fi/∼tella/mep7.html
51. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
52. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2/3), 7-26.
53. Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.