The human embryo: Ethical and legal aspects

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 550, Issue , 2009, Pages 281-305

  Knoppers, Bartha Maria ^a   Bordet, Sylvie ^a   Isasi, Rosario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Embryo research; ethical and legal aspects; legal status of the embryo; moral status of the embryo; stem cell research; the human embryo

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EMBRYO; ARTICLE; CANADA; ETHICS; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; MORALITY;

CANADA; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; ETHICS; HUMANS; JURISPRUDENCE; MORALS;

EID: 69849101606     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-009-0_18     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Dhonte-Isnard, E. (2004) L'embryon humain in vitro et le droit, ́ Edition L'Harmattan, Paris, France.
2. Assisted Human Reproduction Act, S.C. 2004, c. 2 (Canada).
3. Deckers, J. (2007) Why Eberl is wrong. Reflections on the beginning of personhood. Bioethics 21, 270-89.
4. Walin, L. (2007) Ambiguity of the embryo protection in the human rights and biomedicine convention: Experiences from the Nordic countries. Eur. J. Health Law. 14, 131-48. (Pubitemid 47422211)
5. Green, R.M. (2001) The Human Embryo Research Debates: Bioethics in the Vortex of Controversy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
6. DeGrazia, D. (2006) Moral status, human identity and early embryos: a Critique of the President's approach. J. Law Med. Ethics 34, 49-57. (Pubitemid 43448619)
7. Gomez-Lobo, A. (2007) Individuality and human beginnings: A reply to David DeGrazia. J. Law Med. Ethics 35, 457-62.
8. Krones, T., Schl̈uter, E., Neuwohner, E., El Ansari, S.,Wissner, T. and Richter, G. (2006) What is the preimplantation embryo? Soc. Sci. Med. 63, 1-20. (Pubitemid 43668405)
9. Charo, R.A. (2001) Every cell is sacred: Logical consequences of the argument from potential in the age of cloning. In: Lauritzen, P. (ed.), Cloning and the Future of Human Embryo Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp. 82-89.
10. FitzPatrick, W.J. (2004) Totipotency and the moral status of embryo: new problems for an old argument. J. Soc. Philos. 35, 108-22.
11. Deckers, J. (2007) Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson's analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations. J. Med. Ethics 33, 160-64.
12. Agar, N. (2007) Embryonic potential and stem cells. Bioethics 21, 198-207. (Pubitemid 46426610)
13. Hyun, I. and Jung, K.W. (2006) Human research cloning, embryos, and embryo-like artifacts. Hastings Center Rep. 36, 34.
14. Singer, P. and Dawson, K. (1988) IVF technology and the argument from potential. Philos. Public Aff. 17, 87.
15. Camporesi, S. (2007) The context of embryonic development and its ethical relevance. Biotechnol. J. 2, 1147-53. (Pubitemid 47520954)
16. Annas, G. (1996) The politics of humanembryo research: avoiding ethical gridlock. N. Engl. J. Med. 334, 1329-32. (Pubitemid 26138018)
17. Lizza, J.P. (2007) Potentiality and human embryos. Bioethics 21, 379-85. (Pubitemid 47174297)
18. Tauer, C. (2001) Responsibility and regulation: reproductive technologies, cloning and embryo research. In: Lauritzen, P. (ed.), Cloning and the Future of the Human Embryo. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp. 145-61.
19. Elliott, K. (2007) An ironic reductio for a "pro-life" argument: Hurlbut's proposal for stem cell research. Bioethics 21, 98-110. (Pubitemid 46046383)
20. Steinbock, B. (1992) Life Before Birth-The Moral and Legal Status of Embryos and Fetuses. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
21. Steinbock, B. (2007) The science, policy and ethics of stem cell research. Reprod. BioMed. Online 14, 130.
22. Bortolotti, L. and Harris, J. (2005). Stem cell research, personhood and sentience. Reprod. BioMed. Online 10, 68.
23. Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. (1993) Proceed with Care-Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Minister of Government Services, Ottawa, Canada.
24. Warnock, M. (1984) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. H. M. Stationery Office, London, UK.
25. National Institutes of Health. (1994) Report of the Human Embryo Research Panel. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
26. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, 1990 c. 37 (U.K.), as amended by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, 2008 c. 22 (U.K.) (the "HFE Act").
27. Robertson, J.A. (1995) Symbolic issues in embryo research. Hastings Center Rep 25, 37.
28. Gibson, S. (2007) Uses of respect and uses of the human embryo. Bioethics 21, 370-78. (Pubitemid 47174292)
29. Beyleveld, D. (2000) Is embryo research and preimplantation diagnosis ethical? Forensic Sci Int. 113, 461-75. (Pubitemid 30649773)
30. Th́evoz, J.-M. (1990) Entre nos mains l'embryon: recherche bióethique. Labor et Fides, Geneva, Switzerland.
31. Ryan, M.A. (2001) Creating embryos for research: on weighing symbolic costs. In: Lauritzen, P. (ed.), Cloning and the Future of Embryo Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp. 50-66.
32. Keenan, J.S.J. (2001) Casuistry, virtue and the slippery slope: major problems with producing human embryonic life for research purposes. In: Lauritzen, P. (ed.), Cloning and the Future of Human Embryo Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp. 67-81.
33. Steering Committee on Bioethics (CDBI). (2003) The Protection of the Human Embryo In Vitro-Report by the Working Party on the Protection of the Human Embryo and Fetus, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.
34. Deckers, J. (2005) Why current UK legislation on embryo research is immoral.How the argument from lack of qualities and the argument from potentiality have been applied and why they should be rejected. Bioethics 19, 251-71. (Pubitemid 40872239)
35. Callahan, D. (1995) The puzzle of profound respect. Hastings Center Rep. 23, 39.
36. Campbell, C.S. (2001) Source or resource? Human embryo research as an ethical issue. In: Lauritzen, P. (ed.), Cloning and the Future of Human Embryo Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp. 34-49.
37. Mykitiuk, R., Nisker, J. and Bluhm, R. (2007) The Canadian assisted human reproduction act: protecting women's health while potentially allowing human somatic cell nuclear transfer into non-human oocytes. Am. J. Bioeth. 7, 71-73. (Pubitemid 46364831)
38. McLeod, C. and Baylis, F. (2007) Donating fresh versus frozen embryos to stem cell research: in whose interests? Bioethics 21, 465-77. (Pubitemid 47561571)
39. R. v. Morgentaler. (1988) 1 S.C.R. 30.
40. Tremblay v. Daigle. (1989) 2 S.C.R. 530.
41. Dobson (Lit. Guardian of) v. Dobson. (1999) 2 S.C.R. 753.
42. Winnipeg Child and Family Services (NW Area) v. DFG (1997) 3 S.C.R. 925.
43. R. v. Sullivan. (1991) 1 S.C.R. 489.
44. NSERC, SSHRC, CIHR. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Conduct of Research Involving Humans, 1998-2005, online: http://www. pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/ policystatement/policystatement.cfm, accessed November 14, 2008.
45. Order in council 1177-2004, December 15, 2004 (G.O.Q. 2005.ii.62), subsequently amended by order in council 73-2006, February 14, 2006 (G.O.Q. 2006.ii.1290).
46. Renvoi fait par le gouvernement du Qúebec en vertu de la Loi sur les renvois ̀a la Cour d'appel, L.R.Q. ch. R-23, relativement ̀a la constitutionnalit́e des articles 8 ̀a 19, 40 ̀a 53, 60, 61 et 68 de la Loi sur la procŕeation assist́ee, L.C. 2004, ch. 2 (Dans l'affaire du), 2008 QCCA 1167.
47. CIHR. (2007) Updated Guidelines for Pluripotent Stem Cell Research, June 29, 2007, online: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/34460.html, accessed November 14, 2008.
48. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. (2001) I. The moral status of the pre-implantation embryo. Human Reprod. 16, 1046.
49. Standing Committee on Health, House of Commons. (2001) Assisted Human Reproduction: Building Families, online: http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/Committee Publication.aspx?COM=218&Lang=1& SourceId=213651, accessed November 14, 2008.
50. Caulfield, T. and Bubela, T. (2007) Why a criminal ban? Analyzing the arguments against somatic cell nuclear transfer in the Canadian parliamentary debate. Am. J. Bioeth. 7, 51-61.
51. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2007) HFEA Statement on Donating Eggs for Research, 21 February 2007, online: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/en/ 1491.html, accessed November 14, 2008.
52. Act Ensuring the Protection of Embryos in Connection with the Importation and Utilization of Human Embryonic Stem Cells (Stem Cell Act), 28 June 2002, as modified by the Bundestag on April 11, 2008, German Bundestag relaxes Stem Cell Act, online: http://www.bio-pro.de/en/life/magazin/04713/index.html, accessed November 14, 2008.
53. German National Ethics Council. (2007) Should the Stem Cell Law Be Amended? Opinion, online: http://www.ethikrat.org/? english/publications/ Opinion?Should?the? Stem?Cell?Law?be? amended.pdf, accessed November 14, 2008.
54. Merkel, R. (2007) The legal status of the human embryo. Reprod. BioMed. Online 14, 54.
55. Public Law 104-99 (The Balanced Budget Downpayment Act, 1), (1996) 104th Congress (U.S.)
56. Fukuyama, F. and Franco, F. (2008) Beyond bioethics. A Proposal for Modernizing the Regulation of Human Biotechnologies.The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, DC, available online from: http://www.biotechgov.org/, accessed November 14, 2008.
57. Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 (H.R. 810), (2006) 109th Congress (U.S.)
58. Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007 (S. 5), (2007) 110th Congress (U.S.)
59. Office of the Press Secretary. President Bush Discusses Stem Cell Veto and Executive Order, 2007, online: http://www. whitehouse.gov/news/releases/ 2007/06/print/20070620-8.html, accessed November 14, 2008.
60. Executive Order No. 13435, 2007 Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 120, p. 34589.
61. Ratajczak, M.Z., Machalinski, B., Wojakowski, W., Ratajczak, J. and Kucia, M. (2007) A hypothesis for an embryonic origin of pluripotent Oct-4(+) stem cells in adult bone marrow and other tissues. Leukemia 21, 860-67. (Pubitemid 46672060)
62. Zaehres, H. and Scholer, H. (2007) Induction of pluripotency: from mouse to human. Cell 131, 834-35. (Pubitemid 350138100)
63. Pera, M.F. and Hasegawa, K. (2008) Simpler and safer cell reprogramming. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 59-60.
64. European Molecular Biology Organization. (2006) Stem Cell Research-Status Prospects Prerequisites, online: http://www.embo. org/scisoc/EMBO?Stem?Cell?30? nov.pdf, accessed November 14, 2008.
65. The President's Council on Bioethics. (2002) Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry, Washington, DC, online: http://bioethics.gov/ reports/cloningreport/index.html, accessed November 14, 2008.
66. Holden, C. (2006) Stem cell research. Korean cloner admits lying about egg donations. Science 310, 1402-03. (Pubitemid 41746311)
67. Editorial. (2006) Ethics and fraud. Nature 439, 117-18.
68. Cyranoski, D. (2006) Verdict: Hwang's human stem cells were all fakes. Nature 439, 122-23. (Pubitemid 43083111)
69. Park, I.H., Zhao, R., West, J.A., Yabuuchi, A., Huo, H., Ince, T.A., Lerou, P.H., Lensch, M.W. and Daley, G.Q. (2008) Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 451, 141-46.
70. Yu, J., Vodyanik, M.A., Smuga-Otto, K., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Frane, J.L., Tian, S., Nie, J., Jonsdottir, G.A., Ruotti, V., Stewart, R., Slukvin, I.I. and Thomson, J.A. (2007) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318, 1917-20.
71. Nakagawa, M., Koyanagi, M., Tanabe, K., Takahashi, K., Ichisaka, T., Aoi, T., Okita, K., Mochiduki, Y., Takizawa, N. and Yamanaka, S. (2008) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 101-06.
72. Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K. and Yamanaka, S. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861-72. (Pubitemid 350138099)
73. Chung, Y., Klimanskaya, I., Becker, S., Li, T., Maserati, M., Lu, S.J., Zdravkovic, T., Ilic, D., Genbacev, O., Fisher, S., Krtolica, A. and Lanza, R. (2008) Human embryonic stem cell lines generated without embryo destruction. Cell Stem Cell. 2, 113-17. (Pubitemid 351168713)
74. Hudson, K. (2006) Embryo biopsy for stem cells: trading old problems for new ones. Hastings Center Rep. 36, 50.
75. Drukker, M. (2008) Recent advancements towards the derivation of immunecompatible patient-specific human embryonic stem cell lines. Semin. Immunol. 20, 123.
76. Hurlbut, W.B., George, R.P. and Grompe, M. (2006) Seeking consensus: a clarification and defense of altered nuclear transfer. Hastings Center Rep. 36, 42.
77. Liao, S.M. (2005) Rescuing human embryonic stem cell research: the blastocyst transfer method. Am. J. Bioeth. 5, 8-16. (Pubitemid 43111930)
78. Philpott, S. (2005) Eggs, lies and compromise. Am. J. Bioeth. 5, 1-3. (Pubitemid 43111928)
79. Assisted Human Reproduction (Section 8 Consent) Regulations (the "Regulations"), SOR/2007-137, P.C. 2007-958, Canada Gazette Part. II, Vol. 14, No. 13, p. 1520.
80. Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001, 2001 c. 23 (UK).
81. HFEA Statement on licensing of applications to carry out research using humananimal cytoplasmic hybrid embryos, online: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/en/1640. html, accessed November 14, 2008.