Effective instructor feedback: Perceptions of online graduate students

Journal of Educators Online

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 3-

  Getzlaf, Beverley ^a   Perry, Beth ^a   Toffner, Greg ^a   Lamarche, Kimberley ^a   Edwards, Margaret ^a  

^a ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer assisted instruction; Computer assisted learning; Graduate education; Instructor feedback; Online teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 69849092137     PISSN: 1547500X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.9743/JEO.2009.2.1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. nd ed., pp. 343-365). Athabasca, AB: Athabasca University Press.
2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
3. Arbaugh, J. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2).
4. Arbaugh, J., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S., Garrison, D., Ice, P., Richardson, J., et al. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 133-136.
5. Arbaugh, J., & Hornik, S. (2006). Do Chickering and Gamson's seven principles also apply to online MBAs? The Journal of Educators Online, 3(2), 1-18.
6. Arbaugh, J., & Hwang, A. (2006). Does "teaching presence" exist in online MBA courses? Internet and Higher Education, 9, 9-21.
7. Atack, L. (2003). Becoming a web-based learner: Registered nurses' experiences. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(3), 289-297.
8. Bangert, A. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating online teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 217-232.
9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
10. Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233.
11. Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3-6.
12. Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1999). Development and adaptation of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 75-81.
13. Ely, M. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. London: Falmer Press.
14. Garrison, D. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 161-172.
15. Garrison, D., & Arbaugh, J. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 157-172.
16. Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
17. Grandzol, J., & Grandzol, C. (2006). Best practices for online business education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), 1-18.
18. Higgins, R. (2000). "Be more critical!": Rethinking assessment feedback. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference. Retrieved November 25, 2008 from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001548.htm.
19. Hattie, J., & Jaeger, R. (1998). Assessment and classroom instruction: A deductive approach. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 111-122.
20. Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269-274.
21. Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53-64.
22. Huckstadt, A., & Hayes, K. (2005). Evaluation of interactive online courses for advanced practice nurses. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 17(3), 85-89.
23. Hummell, H. (2006). Feedback model to support designers of blended-learning courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3), 1-16.
24. Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in internet-based distance education. Washington, DC: Author.
25. Mancuso-Murphy, J. (2007). Distance education in nursing: An integrated review of online nursing students' experience with technology-delivered education. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(6), 253-260.
26. Miller, S. (2008). Liberating grades/liberatory assessment. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 1(2), 16-171.
27. Mitchell, T., & Jones, S. (2004). Leading and co-ordinating a multi-nurse researcher project. Nurse Researcher, 12(2), 42-56.
28. Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
29. Owen, W.F. (1984). Interpretative themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274-287.
30. Perry, B., & Edwards, M. (2005). Exemplary online educators: Creating a community of inquiry. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(2), 46-54.
31. Perry, B., & Edwards, M. (2006). Using photographic images as an interactive online teaching strategy. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 229-240.
32. Redmond, P., & Lock, J. (2006). A flexible framework for online collaborative learning. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 267-276.
33. Sadler, D. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
34. Sadler, D. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77-84.
35. Seiler, K., & Billings, D. (2004). Student experiences in web-based nursing courses: Benchmarking best practices. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 1(1), 1-12.
36. Shea, P., Li, C., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 175-190.
37. Smith, T. (2005). Fifty-one competencies for online instruction. The Journal of Educators Online, 2(2).
38. Swan, K. (2004). Relationships between interactions and learning in online environments. Sloan-C. Available at www.sloan-c.org/publications/books/interactions.pdf.
39. Taras, M. (2002). Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 501-510.
40. Thurmond, V. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253-258.
41. van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience. London, ON: Althouse Press.
42. Wolsey, T. (2008). Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 311-329.