A longitudinal study of consequential transitions in the teaching of literature

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 89-126

  Newell, George E ^a   Tallman, Linda ^a   Letcher, Mark ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69749124152     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. APPLEBEE, A. N. (1981). Writing in the secondary schools: English and the content areas (Research Monograph 21).Urbana, IL: NCTE.
2. APPLEBEE, A. N. (1984). Contexts for learning to write: Studies of secondary school instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3. APPLEBEE, A. N. (1993). Literature in the secondary school: Studies of curriculum and instruction in the United States. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
4. APPLEBEE, A.N.(1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. BEACH, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 101-139.
6. BEACH, K. (2003). Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organizations. In T. Tuomi-Grdhn & Y. Engestrom (Eds.). Between school and work: New Perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 39-61). Boston: Pergamon.
7. BEACH, R., APPLEMAN, D., HYNDS, S., & WILHELM, J. (2006). Teaching literature to adolescents. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. BERLINER, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performance. In J.N. Mangieri, C.C. Block, & H. Barnes (Eds.) Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives, (pp. 161-186). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
9. BERLINER, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 463-482.
10. BRUNER, J (1983). in search of mind: Esay in autobiography. New York Harper & Row.
11. COCHRAN-SMITH, M. & FRIES, K. (2006). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In M. Cochran-Smith& K. M. Zeichner (Eds.). Studying teacher education: The report on the AERA panel on research and teacher education, (pp. 69-110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. COCHRAN-SMITH, M.& LYTLE, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Educational Research, 24, 249-305.
13. COLE, M (1996). Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. COOK, L. S., SMAGORINSKY, P., FRY, P. G., KONOPAK, B. & MOORE, C. (2002). Problems developing a constructivist approach to teaching: One teacher's transition from teacher preparation to teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 389-413.
15. ELBOW, P. (1990). What is English? New York: Modern Language Association.
16. ENGESTROM, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. ERICSSON, K. A. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights form the study of expert performance. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence through education (pp. 21-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. ERICSSON, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice in the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericcson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683-704). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. FEIMAN-NEMSER, S. & FEATHERSTONE, H. (Eds.). (1992). Exploring teaching: Reinventing an introductory course. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. FULLER, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207-226.
21. GIBSON, W. (1975). The miracle worker. New York: Bantam Books.
22. GOODLAD, J. I. (1984). A place called school Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill Company.
23. GROSSMAN, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. GROSSMAN, P. L. (1992). Why models matter: An alternative view on professional growth in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 62, 171-179.
25. GROSSMAN, P. L. & MCDONALD, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 184-205.
26. GROSSMAN, P. L., SMAGORINSKY, P. & VALENCIA, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108, 1-29.
27. GROSSMAN, P. L., THOMPSON, C, & VALENCIA, S. W. (2002). The impact of district policy on beginning teachers. ERS Spectrum, 20, 10-20.
28. HILLOCKS, JR., G. (1999). Ways of thinking/ Ways of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow's schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools. East Lansing, MI: Holmes Group.
30. HOLT-REYNOLDS, D. (2000). What does the teacher do? Constructivist pedagogies and prospective teachers' beliefs about the role of the teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 21-32.
31. JOHNSON, T. S., SMAGORINSKY, P., THOMPSON, L.& FRY, P. G. (2003). Learning to teach the five paragraph theme. Research in the Teaching of English, 38, 136-176.
32. KAGAN, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129-169.
33. LANGER, J.A. (1995). Envisioning literature: Literary understanding and literature instruction.Newark, De: International REading Association.
34. LANGER, J. A.& APPLEBEE, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
35. LAVE, J. & WENGER, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. LEE, C.D. (2007).Culture, literacy, and learning.Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. New York: Teachers Colleges Press.
37. LEONT'EV A.V.(1981).Problems of the development of the mind (M. Kopylova, Trans.) Moscow: Progress Publishers.
38. LORTIE, D. C.(1975).Schoolteacher: A sociologocal study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. MCCANN, T. M., JOHANNESSEN, L. R., & RICCA, B. P. (2005). Supporting beginning English teachers: Research and implications for teacher induction. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
40. MCDIARMID, G. W. (1992). Tilting at webs of belief: Field experiences as a means of breaking with experience. In S. Feiman-Nemser& H. Featherstone (Eds.) Exploring teaching: Reinventing an introductory course (pp. 34-58). New York: Teachers College Press.
41. MCLAUGHLIN, M. W.& TALBERT, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. MERRIAM. S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
43. MUNGOSHI, C. (1975). Waiting for the rain. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
44. National Council of Teachers of English (2006). Guidelines for the preparation of teachers of English language arts. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
45. NEWELL, G. E. GINGRICH, R. S.& JOHNSON, A. B. (2001). Considering the contexts for appropriating theoretical and practical tools for teaching middle and secondary English. Research in the Teaching of English, 35, 302-343.
46. NYSTRAND, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
47. PURVES, A. C, ROGERS, T., & SOTER, A. O. (1995). How porcupines make love III: Readers, texts cultures in a response-based classroom. New York: Longman.
48. RICHARDSON, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105, 1623-1640.
49. ROSENBLATT, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
50. SCHOLES, R.(1985) Textual power: Literary theory and the teaching of English, New Haven: Yale University Press.
51. SHAKESPEARE, W. (1988). The tragedy of Julius Caesar. In D. Bevington & D. S. Kastan (Eds.), Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. New York: Bantam Classics Paperback. (Original work published c. 1599)
52. SHEERAN, Y.& BARNES, D. (1991). School writing: Discovering the ground rules. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
53. SIZER T.R.(1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of American high school Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
54. SIZER, T.R.(1992).Horace's school: Redesigning the american high school.Boston:Houghton Miffin.
55. SMAGORINSKY, P., COOK, L. S., & JOHNSON, T. S. (2003). The twisting path of concept development in learning to teach. Teachers College Record, 105, 1399-1436.
56. SMAGORINSKY, P., & WHITING, M. E. (1995). How English teachers get taught: Methods of teaching the methods course. Urbana, IL: Conference on English Education and NCTE.
57. SMITH, M. W.& WILHELM, J. D. (2002). "Reading don't fix no Chevys" Literacy in the lives of young men. Portsmouth, NJ: Heinemann.
58. STEINBECK, J. (1994). The Pearl New York: Penguin Books. (Original work published in 1945)
59. STODOLSKY, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. WERTSCH, J. V. (1981). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: An introduction. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.& Trans.). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 3-36). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
61. WERTSCH, J. V. (1993). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. ZEICHNER, K. M.& NOFFKE, S. E. (2001). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Teaching. (4th ed., pp. 298-330.) Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
63. ZEICHNER, K. M.& TABACHNIK, B. R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education "washed out" by school experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 7-11.
64. ZEMELMAN, S.& DANIELS, H. (1988). A community of writers: Teaching writing in the junior and senior high school Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.