Extra-regional residence time as a correlate of plant invasiveness: European archaeophytes in north America

Ecology

Volumn 90, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 2589-2597

  Sorte, Frank A L A ^a   Petr, Pyšek ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Beta diversity; Biotic homogenization; Compositional similarity; Distance decay; European archaeophyte; Invasiveness; Nonnative species; North america; Plant species invasion potential; Residence time; Vascular plants

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; HUMAN ACTIVITY; RESIDENCE TIME; SPECIES DIVERSITY; VASCULAR PLANT; WEED CONTROL;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPE; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; UNITED STATES;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; EUROPE; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; PLANTS; REPRODUCTION; UNITED STATES;

NORTH AMERICA;

TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 69449086822     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/08-1528.1     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Boyle, B. L. 2006. The SALVIAS project. TaxonScrubber Version 2.0. (http://www.salvias.net/pages/taxonscrubber. html)
2. Castro, S. A., J. A. Figueroa, M. Muñoz-Schick, and F. M. Jaksic. 2005. Minimum residence time, biogeographical origin, and life cycle as determinants of the geographical extent of naturalized plants in continental Chile. Diversity and Distributions 11:183-191.
3. Chytrý, M., V. Jarošík, P. Pyšek, O. Hájek, I. Knollová, L. Tichý, and J. Danihelka. 2008a. Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology 89:1541-1553.
4. Chytrý, M., L. C. Maskell, J. Pino, P. Pyšek, M. Vilà, X. Font, and S. M. Smart. 2008b. Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:448-458.
5. Chytrý,M.,P.Pyšek,L.Tichý,I.Knollová,andJ. Danihelka.2005.InvasionsbyalienplantsintheCzechRepublic: aquantitativeassessmentacrosshabitats.Preslia77:339-354.(Pubitemid43273630)
6. Colautti, R. I., I. A. Grigorovich, and H. J. MacIsaac. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biological Invasions 8:1023-1037. (Pubitemid 44222589)
7. Daehler, C. C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:183-211.
8. Elton, C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, UK.
9. Gould, S. J., and E. S. Vrba. 1982. Exaptation; a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4-15.
10. Hamilton, M. A., B. R. Murray, M. W. Cadotte, G. C. Hose, A. C. Baker, C. J. Harris, and D. Licari. 2005. Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecology Letters 8:1066-1074.
11. Hayes, K. R., and S. C. Barry. 2008. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biological Invasions 10:483-506.
12. Hillebrand, H., D. M. Bennett, and M. W. Cadotte. 2008. Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology 89:1510-1520.
13. Holm, L., J. Doll, E. Holm, J. Pancho, and J. Herberger. 1997. World weeds: natural histories and distributions. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
14. Jaccard, P. 1900. Contribution au problème de l'immigration post-glaciare de la flore alpine. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 36:87-130.
15. Kolar, C. S., and D. M. Lodge. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:199-204.
16. Koleff, P., K. J. Gaston, and J. J. Lennon. 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology 72:367-382. (Pubitemid 36551492)
17. Kowarik, I. 1995. Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. Pages 15-38 in P. Pyšek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek, and M. Wade, editors. Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
18. Kühn, I., and S. Klotz. 2002. Floristischer Status und gebietsfremde Arten. Pages 47-56 in S. Klotz, I. Kühn, and W. Durka, editors. BIOLFLOR-Eine Datenbank zu biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen der Gefäßpflanzen in Deutschland. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 38. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, Germany.
19. Kühn, I., and S. Klotz. 2006 Urbanization and homogenization- comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany. Biological Conservation 127:292-300. (Pubitemid 41728077)
20. Kühn, I., R. May, R. Brandl, and S. Klotz. 2003. Plant distribution patterns in Germany-Will aliens match natives? Feddes Repertorium 114:559-573.
21. Küster, E. C., I. Kühn, H. Bruelheide, and S. Klotz. 2008. Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora. Journal of Ecology 96:860-868.
22. La Sorte, F. A., and M. L. McKinney. 2007. Compositional changes over space and time along an occurrence-abundance continuum: anthropogenic homogenization of the North American avifauna. Journal of Biogeography 34:2159-2167.
23. La Sorte, F. A., M. L. McKinney, and P. Pyšek. 2007. Compositional similarity among urban floras within and across continents: biogeographical consequences of humanmediated biotic interchange. Global Change Biology 13:913-921.
24. La Sorte, F. A., M. L. McKinney, P. Pyšek, S. Klotz, G. L. Rapson, L. Celesti-Grapow, and K. Thompson. 2008. Distance decay in similarity among European urban floras: the impact of anthropogenic activities on beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17:363-371.
25. Lambdon, P. W., et al. 2008. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80:101-149.
26. Lennon, J. J., P. Koleff, J. J. D. Greenwood, and K. J. Gaston. 2001. The geographic structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale. Journal of Animal Ecology 70:966-979.
27. Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10:689-710.
28. McKinney, M. L. 2004. Measuring floristic homogenization by nonnative plants in North America. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13:47-53. (Pubitemid 38531103)
29. McKinney, M. L., and F. A. La Sorte. 2007. Invasiveness and homogenization: synergism of wide dispersal and high local abundance. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:394-400.
30. McKinney, M. L., and J. L. Lockwood. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 450-453.
31. McNeely, J. A. 2005. Human dimensions of invasive alien species. Pages 285-309 in H. A. Mooney, R. N. Mack, J. F. McNeely, L. E. Neville, P. J. Schei, and J. K. Waage, editors. Invasive alien species. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
32. Nekola, J. C., and P. S. White. 1999. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. Journal of Biogeography 26:867-878.
33. Parker, C., B. P. Caton, and L. Fowler. 2007. Ranking nonindigenous weed species by their potential to invade the United States. Weed Science 55:386-397. (Pubitemid 47186329)
34. Preston, C. D., D. A. Pearman, and A. R. Hall. 2004. Archaeophytes in Britain. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 145:257-294.
35. Pyšek, P., and V. Jarošík. 2005. Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants. Pages 77-96 in S. Inderjit, editor. Invasive plants: ecological and agricultural aspects. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
36. Pyšek,P.,V.Jarošík,M.Chytrý,Z. Kropáč,L.Tichý,andJ.Wild.2005. Alienplantsintemperateweedcommunities: prehistoricandrecentinvadersoccupydifferenthabitats.Ecology86:772-785. (Pubitemid40390670)
37. Pyšek, P., and D. M. Richardson. 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? Pages 97-125 in W. Nentwig, editor. Biological invasions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
38. Pyšek, P., D. M. Richardson, J. Pergl, V. Jarošík, Z. Sixtová, and E. Weber. 2008. Geographical and taxonomie biases in invasion ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23:237-244. (Pubitemid 351626202)
39. Pyšek,P.,D.M.Richardson,M.Rejmánek,G.L.Webster,M. Williamson,andJ.Kirschner.2004a.Alienplantsinchecklistsandfloras: towardsbettercommunicationbetweentaxonomistsandecologists.Taxon53:131-143. (Pubitemid38329455)
40. Pyšek, P., D. M. Richardson, and M. Williamson. 2004b. Predicting and explaining plant invasions through analysis of source area floras: some critical considerations. Diversity and Distributions 10:179-187. (Pubitemid 38600477)
41. Pyšek,P.,J.Sádlo,andB.Mandák.2002. CatalogueofalienplantsoftheCzechRepublic.Preslia74:97-186.(Pubitemid34718456)
42. Qian, H., and R. E. Ricklefs. 2006. The role of exotic species in homogenizing the North American flora. Ecology Letters 9: 1293-1298. (Pubitemid 44789721)
43. Rejmánek, M. 2000. Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25:497-506.
44. Rejmánek, M., D. M. Richardson, S. I. Higgins, M. J. Pitcairn, and E. Grotkopp. 2005. Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. Pages 104-161 in H. A. Mooney, R. M. Mack, J. A. McNeely, L. Neville, P. Schei, and J. Waage, editors. Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
45. Richardson, D. M., and P. Pyšek. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography 30:409-431.
46. Sádlo,J.,M.Chytrý,andP.Pyšek.2007. RegionalspeciespoolsofvascularplantsinhabitatsoftheCzechRepublic.Preslia79: 303-321.(Pubitemid350253600)
47. Scholz, H. 1995. Das Archäophytenproblem in neuer Sicht. Pages 431-439 in I. Kowarik, U. Starfinger, and L. Trepl, editors. Dynamik und Konstanz. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 27. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, Germany.
48. Scholz, H. 2007. Questions about indigenous plants and anecophytes. Taxon 56:1255-1260.
49. Settele, J., et al. 2005. ALARM: Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods: the concept, objectives, structure and management of a large integrated project within the 6th framework programme of the European Commission. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 14:69-72.
50. Soininen, J., R. McDonald, and H. Hillebrand. 2007. The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30:3-12. (Pubitemid 46310624)
51. Thuiller,W.,D.M.Richardson,M.Rouget,S.Procheş,andJ.R.U.Wilson. 2006.Interactionsbetweenenvironment,speciestraits, andhumanusesdescribepatternsofplantinvasions.Ecology87:1755-1769. (Pubitemid44141553)
52. USDA, NRCS [USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service]. 2008. The PLANTS database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA. (http://plants.usda. gov)
53. Vitousek,P.M.,C.M.D'Antonio,L.L.Loope,M.Rejmánek,andR.Westbrooks. 1997.Introducedspecies:asignificantcomponentofhuman-causedglobalchange. NewZealandJournalofEcology21:1-16.(Pubitemid127596633)
54. Weber, E. 2003. Invasive plant species of the world: a reference guide to environmental weeds. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
55. Whittaker, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213-251.
56. Williamson, M. 1999. Invasions. Ecography 22:5-12.
57. Williamson, M., K. Dehnen-Schmutz, I. Kühn, M. Hill, S. Klotz, A. Milbau, J. Stout, and P. Pyšek. 2009. The distribution of range sizes of native and alien plants in four European countries and the effects of residence time. Diversity and Distributions 15:158-166.
58. Wilson, J. R. U., D. M. Richardson, M. Rouget, S. Prochedş, M. A. Amis, L. Henderson, and W. Thuiller. 2007. Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions. Diversity and Distributions 13:11-22.