Alien plants in temperate weed communities: Prehistoric and recent invaders occupy different habitats

Ecology

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 772-785

  Pyšek, Petr ^a,b   Jarošík, Vojtěch ^a,b   Chytrý, Milan ^c   Kropáč, Zdeněk ^d   Tichý, Lubomír ^c   Wild, Jan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^d NONE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Agricultural management; Archaeophytes; Biological invasions; Central Europe; Climate; Crop characteristics; Exotic species; Invasion history; Neolithic agriculture; Neophytes; Soil type

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; ARABLE LAND; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CLIMATE; FLORISTICS; SPECIES RICHNESS; WEED;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; WORLD;

TRACHEOPHYTA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 15344344413     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/04-0012     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Andersson, T. N., and P. Milberg. 1998. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen. Weed Science 46:30-38.
2. Andreasen, C., H. Stryhn, and J. C. Streibig. 1996. Decline of the flora in Danish arable fields. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:619-626.
3. Bullied, W. J., M. H. Entz, S. R. Smith, and K. C. Bamford. 2002. Grain yield and N benefits to sequential wheat and barley crops from single-year alfalfa, berseem and red clover, chickling vetch and lentil. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82:53-65.
4. Chicoine, T. K., P. K. Fay, and G. A. Nielsen. 1985. Predicting weed migration from soil and climate maps. Weed Science 34:57-61.
5. Chytrý, M. 2001. Phytosociological data give biased estimates of species richness. Journal of Vegetation Science 12:439-444.
6. Chytrý, M., and M. Rafajová. 2003. Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. Preslia 75:1-15.
7. Cox, D. R., and E. J. Snell. 1990. Analysis of binary data. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
8. Crawley, M. J. 1987. What makes a community invasible? Pages 429-543 in A. J. Gray, M. J. Crawley, and P. J. Edwards, editors. Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.
9. Crawley, M. J. 1993. GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.
10. Crawley, M. J., P. H. Harvey, and A. Purvis. 1996. Comparative ecology of the native and alien floras of the British Isles. Biological Transactions of the Royal Society B 351:1251-1259.
11. Dale, M. R. T., A. G. Thomas, and E. A. John. 1992. Environmental factors including management practices as correlates of weed community composition in spring seeded crops. Canadian Journal of Botany 70:1931-1939.
12. Castri, F. 1989. History of biological invasions with special emphasis on the Old World. Pages 1-30 in J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, and M. Williamson, editors. Biological invasions: a global perspective. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
13. Ellenberg, H. 1950. Unkrautgemeinschaften als Zeiger für Klima und Boden. Landwirtschaftliche Pflanzensoziologie I. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart/Ludwigsburg, Germany.
14. Ellenberg, H. 1988. Vegetation ecology of central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Erviö, R., S. Hyvärinen, L.-R. Erviö, and J. Salonen. 1994. Soil properties affecting weed distribution in spring cereal and vegetable fields. Agricultural Science in Finland 3:497-504.
16. PAO-UNESCO. 1988. Soil map of the World. FAO, Rome, Italy.
17. Francis, B., M. Green, and C. Payne, editors. 1994. The GLIM System. Release 4 Manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
18. Gilbert, O. L. 1989. The ecology of urban habitats. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
19. Gill, J. L., and W. H. Fick. 2001. Soil nitrogen mineralization in mixtures of eastern gamagrass with alfalfa and red clover. Agronomy Journal 93:902-910.
20. Hallgren, E., M. W. Palmer, and P. Milberg. 1999. Data diving with cross-validation: an investigation of broad-scale gradients in Swedish weed communities. Journal of Ecology 87:1037-1051.
21. Hilbig, W. 1987. Changes in segetal vegetation under conditions of industrialized agriculture. Archiv für Naturschutz und Landschaftsforschung 27:229-249.
22. Hilbig, W., and G. Bachthaler. 1992. Wirtschaftsbedingte Veränderungen der Segetalvegetation in Deutschland in Zeitraum von 1950-1990. Angewandte Botanik 66:192-209.
23. Holub, J., and V. Jirásek. 1967. Zur Vereinheitlichung der Terminologie in der Phytogeographie. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 2:69-113.
24. Holzner, W., and R. Immonen. 1982. Europe: an overview. Pages 203-226 in W. Holzner and N. Numata, editors. Biology and ecology of weeds. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands.
25. Hügin, G. 1999. Was sind Wärmezeiger? Untersuchungen zum Wärmebedürfnis von Ruderal- und Segetalpflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Tuexenia 19:425-445.
26. Humphries, S. E., R. H. Groves, and D. S. Mitchell. 1991. Plant invasions of Australian ecosystems. Kowari 2:1-134.
27. Hyvönen, T., and J. Salonen. 2002. Weed species diversity and community composition in cropping practices at two intensity levels - a six-year experiment. Plant Ecology 159:73-81.
28. Kleijn, D., and M. Verbeek. 2000. Factors affecting the species composition of arable field boundary vegetation. Journal of Applied Ecology 37:256-266.
29. Klotz, S., I. Kühn, and W. Durka. 2002. BIOLFLOR - Eine Datenbank mit biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 38:1-334.
30. Kowarik, I. 1990. Some responses of flora and vegetation to urbanization in Central Europe. Pages 45-74 in H. Sukopp, S. Hejný and I. Kowarik, editors. Urban ecology. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.
31. Kowarik, I. 2003. Biologische Invasionen: Neophyten und Neozoen in Mitteleuropa. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.
32. Kropáč, Z. 1988. Veränderungen der Unkrautgemeinschaften in der Tschechoslowakei und die Konsequenzen für die landwirtschaftliche Praxis. Wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift der Universität Halle 37:100-126.
33. Kropáč, Z., E. Hadač, and S. Hejný. 1971. Some remarks on the synecological and syntaxonomic problems of weed plant communities. Preslia 43:139-153.
34. Kubát, K., L. Hrouda, J. Chrtek Jun, Z. Kaplan, J. Kirschner, J. Štěpánek, and J. Zázvorka, editors. 2002. Klíč ke květeně České republiky. Academia, Praha, Czech Republic.
35. Lang, G. 1994. Quartäre Vegetationsgeschichte Europas. Methoden und Ergebnisse. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany.
36. Lonsdale, M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522-1536.
37. Lososová, Z. 2003. Estimating past distribution of vanishing weed vegetation in South Moravia. Preslia 75:71-79.
38. Lososová, Z., M. Chytrý, Š. Cimalová, Z. Kropáč, Z. Otýpková, P. Pyšek, and L. Tichý. 2004. Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: gradients of diversity and species composition. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:415-422.
39. Lososová, Z., J. Danihelka, and M. Chytrý. 2003. Seasonal dynamics and diversity of weed vegetation in tilled and mulched vineyards. Biologia 58:49-57.
40. Ložek, V. 1973. Příroda ve čtvrtohorá ch. Academia, Praha, Czechoslovakia.
41. Malhi, S. S., R. P. Zentner, and K. Heier. 2002. Effectiveness of alfalfa in reducing fertilizer N input for optimum forage yield, protein concentration, returns and energy performance of bromegrass-alfalfa mixtures. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 62:219-227.
42. Mansfeld, R. 1986. Verzeichnis landwirtschaftlicher und gärtnerischer Kulturpflanzen (ohne Zierpflanzen). Second edition. Volumes 1-4. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
43. McCullagh, P., and J. A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
44. Mihulka, S. 1998. The effect of altitude on the pattern of plant invasions: a field test. Pages 313-320 in U. Starfinger, K. Edwards, I. Kowarik, and M. Williamson, editors. Plant invasions: ecological mechanisms and human responses. Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands.
45. Neuhäuslová, Z., et al. 2001. Potential natural vegetation of the Czech Republic. Braun-Blanquetia 30:1-80.
46. Opiz, F. M. 1852. Seznam rostlin květeny české. Spisů Musejních 44. V kommissí u Fr. Řivná če, Praha, Austria.
47. Panetta, F. D., and N. D. Mitchell. 1991. Bioclimatic prediction of the potential distribution of some weed species prohibited entry to New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34:341-350.
48. Piutti, S., S. Hallet, S. Rousseaux, L. Philippot, G. Soulas, and F. Martin-Laurent. 2002. Accelerated mineralization of atrazine in maize rhizosphere soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 36:434-441.
49. Preston, C. D., D. A. Pearman, and T. D. Dines. 2002. New atlas of the British and Irish flora. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
50. Pyšek, A., P. Pyšek, V. Jarošík, M. Hájek, and J. Wild. 2003a. Diversity of native and alien plant species on rubbish dumps: effects of dump age, environmental factors and toxicity. Diversity and Distributions 9:177-189.
51. Pyšek, P., V. Jarošík, Z. Kropáč, M. Chytrý, J. Wild, and L. Tichý. 2005. Species richness and cover in Central-European weed communities: the effect of abiotic environment, crop and management over time. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, in press.
52. Pyšek, P., V. Jarošík, and T. Kučera. 2002a. Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves. Biological Conservation 104:13-24.
53. Pyšek, P., V. Jarošík, and T. Kučera. 2003b. Inclusion of native and alien species in temperate nature reserves: an historical study from Central Europe. Conservation Biology 17:1414-1424.
54. Pyšek, P., T. Kučera, and V. Jarošík. 2002c. Plant species richness of nature reserves: the interplay of area, climate and habitat in a central European landscape. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11:279-289.
55. Pyšek, P., and J. Lepš. 1991. Response of weed community to nitrogen fertilization: a multivariate analysis, Journal of Vegetation Science 2:237-244.
56. Pyšek, P., D. M. Richardson, M. Rejmánek, G. Webster, M. Williamson, and J. Kirschner. 2004a. Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131-143.
57. Pyšek, P., D. M. Richardson, and M. Williamson. 2004b. Importance of residence status and source areas in analyses of alien floras. Diversity and Distributions 10:179-187.
58. Pyšek, P., J. Sádlo, and B. Mandák. 2002b. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 74:97-186.
59. Pyšek, P., J. Sádlo, and B. Mandák. 2003c. Alien flora of the Czech Republic, its composition, structure and history. Pages 113-130 in L. E. Child, J. H. Brock, G. Brundu, K. Prach, P. Pyšek, P. M. Wade, and M. Williamson, editors. Plant invasions: ecological threats and management solutions. Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands.
60. Pyšek, P., J. Sádlo, B. Mandák, and V. Jarošík. 2003d. Czech alien flora and a historical pattern of its formation: what came first to Central Europe? Oecologia 135:122-130.
61. Quitt, E. 1975. Klimatické oblasti České socialistické republiky. Institute of Geography, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechoslovakia.
62. Randall, J. M. 1997. Defining weeds of natural areas. Pages 18-25 in J. O. Luken and J. W. Thieret, editors. Assessment and management of plant invasions. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
63. Reichard, S. H., and C. W. Hamilton. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology 11:193-203.
64. Rejmánek, M. 2000. Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25:497-506.
65. Richardson, D. M., W. J. Bond, W. R. J. Dean, S. I. Higgins, G. F. Midgley, S. J. Milton, L. Powrie, M. C. Rutherford, M. J. Samways, and R. E. Schulze. 2000a. Invasive alien species and global change: a South African perspective. Pages 303-349 in H. A. Mooney and R. J. Hobbs, editors. Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, D. C., USA.
66. Richardson, D. M., P. Pyšek, M. Rejmánek, M. G. Barbour, F. D. Panetta, and C. J. West. 2000b. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6:93-107.
67. Roberts, N. 1998. The Holocene. An environmental history. Second edition. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
68. Salonen, J. 1993. Weed infestation and factors affecting weed incidence in spring cereals in Finland - a multivariate approach. Agricultural Science in Finland 2:525-536.
69. Scott, J. K., and F. D. Panetta. 1993. Predicting the Australian weed status of southern African plants. Journal of Biogeography 20:87-93.
70. Skalický, V. 1988. Regionálně fytogeografické členění. Pages 103-121 in S. Hejný and B. Slavík, editors. Květena České socialistické republiky. Academia, Praha, Czechoslovakia.
71. Sokal, R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. Third edition. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
72. Štěpánek, J., and P. Tomšovic. 2000. 7. Solanum L. - lilek. Pages 260-280 in B. Slavík, J. Ště pánková, and J. Chrtek Jun, editors. Květena České republiky. Volume 6. Academia, Praha, Czech Republic.
73. Stevenson, F. C., A. Legere, R. R. Simard, D. A. Angers, D. Pageau, and J. Lafond. 1997. Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage, but not with nutrient source. Weed Science 45:798-806.
74. Sukopp, H. 2002. On the early history of urban ecology in Europe. Preslia 74:373-393.
75. Thellung, A. 1905. Einteilung der Ruderal- und Adventivflora in genetische Gruppen. Die Flora des Kanton Zürich, I. Teil. Die Ruderal- und Adventivflora des Kanton Zürich. Pages 232-236 in O. Naegeli and A. Thellung, editors. Vierteljahrschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 50.
76. Tomášek, M. 2000. Půdy České republiky. Czech Geological Institute, Praha, Czech Republic.
77. Tomšovic, P. 1990. 2. Beta L. - řepa. Pages 219-223 in S. Hejný, B. Slavík, L. Hrouda, and V. Skalický, editors. Květena České republiky. Volume 2. Academia, Praha, Czechoslovakia.
78. Tüxen, R. 1962. Gedanken zur Zerstörung der mitteleuropäischen Ackerbiozoenosen. Mitteilungen der Floristisch- Soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft, N. F. 9:60-61.
79. Vesecký, A., Š. Petrovič, V. Briedoň, and V. Karský. 1958. Climatic atlas of Czechoslovakia. Academia, Praha, Czechoslovakia.
80. Westhoff, V., and E. van der Maarel. 1978. The Braun-Blanquet approach. Pages 287-399 in R. H. Whittaker, editor. Classification of plant communities. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands.
81. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
82. Zelený, V. 1992. 45. Brassica L. - brukev. Pages 215-218 in S. Hejný, B. Slavík, J. Kirschner, and J. Křísa, editors. Květena České republiky. Volume 3. Academia, Praha, Czechoslovakia.