Biotic homogenization: A few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 450-453

  McKinney, Michael L ^a   Lockwood, Julie L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHY; GEOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; REVIEW; TAXONOMY;

EID: 0033231959     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1     Document Type: Note

References (40)

1. Lodge D.M. Species invasions and deletions: community effects and responses to climate and habitat change. Kareiva P., Kingsolver J., Huey R. Biotic Interactions and Global Change. 1993;367-387 Sinauer.
2. Harrison S. Species diversity, spatial scale, and global change. Kareiva P., Kingsolver J., Huey R. Biotic Interactions and Global Change. 1993;388-401 Sinauer.
3. Brown J.H. Macroecology. 1995;University of Chicago Press.
4. Vitousek P.M.et al. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 84:1996;468-478.
5. Myers N. Mass extinction and evolution. Science. 278:1997;597-598.
6. Baskin Y. Winners and losers in a changing world. BioScience. 48:1998;788-792.
7. Quammen D. Planet of weeds: tallying the losses of Earth's animals and plants. Harper's Magazine. 282(10):1998;57-69.
8. Morris D.W., Heidinga L. Balancing the books on biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 11:1997;287-290.
9. Erwin D.H. The end and beginning: recoveries from mass extinctions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:1998;344-349.
10. Williamson M. Biological Invasions. 1996;Chapman & Hall.
11. Lockwood J.L. Using taxonomy to predict success among introduced aviafauna: the relative importance of transport and establishment. Conserv. Biol. 13:1999;560-567.
12. Russell G.J.et al. Taxonomic selectivity in past and present bird and mammal extinctions. Conserv. Biol. 12:1999;1365-1376.
13. Brown J.H. Patterns, modes and extents of invasions of vertebrates. Drake J.et al. Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective. 1989;85-109 John Wiley & Sons.
14. Baillie J., Groombridge B. Red list of threatened animals. 1996;IUCN (The World Conservation Union).
15. McKinney M.L. On predicting biotic homogenization: species-area patterns in marine biota. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 7:1998;297-301.
16. Lever C. Naturalized Mammals of the World. 1987;Longman Scientific and Technical Books.
17. Daehler C.C. The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biol. Conserv. 84:1998;167-180.
18. Carlton J.T. Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology. 77:1996;1653-1655.
19. McKinney M.L. Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:1997;495-516.
20. Bennett P.M., Owens I. Variation in extinction risk among birds: chance or evolutionary predisposition? Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 264:1997;401-408.
21. Goerck J.M. Patterns in rarity in the birds of the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Conserv. Biol. 11:1997;112-118.
22. Pysek P. Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos. 82:1998;282-294.
23. Reichard S.H. Prevention of invasive plant introductions on national and local levels. Luken J., Thieret J. Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. 1997;215-227 Springer-Verlag.
24. Pearman P.B. Correlates of amphibian diversity in an altered landscape of Amazonian Ecuador. Conserv. Biol. 11:1997;1211-1225.
25. Ingham D., Samways M. Application of fragmentation and variegation models to epigaeic invertebrates in South Africa. Conserv. Biol. 10:1996;1353-1358.
26. Collar N.et al. Birds to Watch 2: The World List of Threatened Birds (Birdlife Conservation Series No. 4). 1996;BirdLife International.
27. Thiollay J-M. The role of traditional agroforests in the conservation of rain forest bird diversity in Sumatra. Conserv. Biol. 9:1995;335-353.
28. Blair R.B. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6:1996;506-519.
29. Hobbs R.J., Mooney H. Broadening the extinction debate: population deletions and additions in California and Western Australia. Conserv. Biol. 12:1998;271-283.
30. van Swaay C. An assessment of the changes in butterfly abundance in the Netherlands during the 20th century. Biol. Conserv. 52:1990;287-302.
31. Demaynadier P.G., Hunter M. Jr. Effects of silvicultural edges on the distribution and abundance of amphibians in Maine. Conserv. Biol. 12:1998;340-352.
32. Heath J.et al. Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. 1984;Viking.
33. Falk S. A Review of the Scarce and Threatened Bees, Wasps and Ants of Great Britain. 1991;The Nature Conservancy Council.
34. Holloway J.D. The relative vulnerabilities of moth higher taxa to habitat change in Borneo. Forey P.et al. Systematics and Conservation Evaluation. 1991;197-205 Clarendon Press.
35. Turner I.et al. A century of plant species loss from an isolated fragment of lowland tropical rain forest. Conserv. Biol. 10:1995;1229-1244.
36. Marsden S.J. Changes in bird abundance following selective logging on Seram, Indonesia. Conserv. Biol. 12:1998;605-611.
37. Adams L.W. Urban Wildlife Habitats: A Landscape Perspective. 1994;University of Minnesota Press.
38. Hernandez H.M., Barcenas R. Endangered cacti in the Chihuahuan Desert. Conserv. Biol. 10:1996;1200-1209.
39. Niemela J. Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conserv. Biol. 11:1996;601-610.
40. Tennessen T., Hudson R.J. Traits relevant to the domestication of herbivores. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 7:1981;87-102.