A phylogenetic supertree of the fowls (Galloanserae, Aves)

Zoologica Scripta

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 465-481

  Eo, Soo Hyung ^a   Bininda Emonds, Olaf R P ^b   Carroll, John P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATIDAE; ANHIMIDAE; ANSERANATIDAE; ANSERIFORMES; AVES; CRACIDAE; GALLIFORMES; MEGAPODIIDAE;

EID: 68949107994     PISSN: 03003256     EISSN: 14636409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2008.00382.x     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Armstrong, M. H., Braun, E. L. Kimball, R. T. (2001). Phylogenetic utility of avian ovomucoid intron G: a comparison of nuclear and mitochodrial phylogenies in Galliformes. Auk, 118, 799 804.
2. Baum, B. R. (1992). Combining trees as a way of combining datasets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon, 41, 3 10.
3. Beck, R. M. D., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Cardillo, M., Liu, F.-G. R. Purvis, A. (2006). A higher-level MRP supertree of placental mammals. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 6, 93.
4. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. (2003). Novel versus unsupported clades: Assessing the qualitative support for clades in MRP supertrees. Systematic Biology, 52, 839 848.
5. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. (2004). The evolution of supertrees. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 315 322.
6. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. (2005). Supertree construction in the genomic age. In E. A. Zimmer E. Roalson (Eds) Molecular Evolution: Producing the Biochemical Data, Part B, Methods in Enzymology, 395 (pp. 745 757). San Diego : Elsevier.
7. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Beck, R. M. D. Purvis, A. (2005). Getting to the roots of matrix representation. Systematic Biology, 54, 668 672.
8. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Cardillo, M., Jones, K. E., MacPhee, R. D. E., Beck, R. M. D., Grenyer, R. et al 2007). The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature, 446, 507 512.
9. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Gittleman, J. L. Purvis, A. (1999). Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biological Reviews, 74, 143 175.
10. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Gittleman, J. L. Steel, M. A. (2004a). The supertree of life: Procedures, problems, and prospects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 265 289.
11. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Jones, K. E., Price, S. A., Cardillo, M., Grenyer, R. Purvis, A. (2004b). Garbage in, garbage out: Data issues in supertree construction. In O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds (Ed.) Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life (pp. 267 280). Dordrecht : Kluwer.
12. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. Sanderson, M. J. (2001). An assessment of the accuracy of MRP supertree reconstruction. Systematic Biology, 50, 565 579.
13. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Jones, K. E., Price, S. A., Grenyer, R., Cardillo, M., Habib, M., Purvis, A. Gittleman, J. L. (2003). Supertrees are a necessary not-so-evil: a comment on Gatesy et al. Systematic Biology, 52, 724 729.
14. Birks, S. M. Edwards, S. V. (2002). A phylogeny of the megapodes (aves: Megapodiidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 23, 408 421.
15. Bremer, K. (1988). The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution, 42, 795 803.
16. Cardillo, M., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Boakes, E. Purvis, A. (2004). A species-level phylogenetic supertree of marsupials. Journal of Zoology, 264, 11 31.
17. Chen, D., Diao, L., Eulenstein, O., Fernández-Baca, D. Sanderson, M. (2003). Flipping: a supertree construction method. In M. F. Janowitz, F.-J. Lapointe, F. R. McMorris, B. Mirkin F. S. Roberts (Eds) Bioconsensus (pp. 135 160). DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Sciences, Vol. 61. American Mathematical Society.
18. Cracraft, J., Feinstein, J., Garcia-Moreno, J., Barker, F. K., Stanley, S., Sorenson, M. D. et al 2004). Phylogenetic relationships among modern birds (Neornithes): Toward an avian tree of life. In J. Cracraft M. J. Donoghue (Eds) Assembling the Tree of Life (pp. 468 489). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
19. Crowe, T. M. (1978). The evolution of guinea-fowl (Galliformes, Phasianidae, Numidinae) taxonomy, phylogeny, speciation and biogeography. Annals of the South African Museum, 76, 43 136.
20. Crowe, T. M., Harley, E. H., Jakutowicz, M. B., Komen, J. Crowe, A. A. (1992). Phylogenetic, taxonomic and biogeographical implications of genetic, morphological, and behavioral variations in francolins (Phasianidae: Francolinus). Auk, 109, 24 42.
21. Crowe, T. M., Bowie, R. C. K., Bloomer, P., Mandiwana, T. G., Hedderson, T. A. J., Randi, E. et al 2006). Phylogenetics, biogeography and classification of, and character evolution in, gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes): Effects of character exclusion, data partitioning and missing data. Cladistics, 22, 495 532.
22. Davies, T. J., Barraclough, T. G., Chase, M. W., Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. Savolainen, V. (2004). Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the Angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 101, 1904 1909.
23. Delacour, J. Mayr, E. (1945). The family Anatidae. Wilson Bulletin, 57, 3 55.
24. Dickinson, E. C. (2003). The Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World. London : Christopher Helm.
25. Dimcheff, D. E., Drovetski, S. V. Mindell, D. P. (2002). Phylogeny of Tetraoninae and other galliform birds using mitochondrial 12S and ND2 genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 24, 203 215.
26. Donne-Gousse, C., Laudet, V. Hanni, C. (2002). A molecular phylogeny of Anseriformes based on mitochondrial DNA analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 23, 339 356.
27. Drovetski, S. V. (2002). Molecular phylogeny of grouse: Individual and combined performance of W-linked, autosomal, and mitochondrial loci. Systematic Biology, 51, 930 945.
28. Dunning, J. B. (1993). CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses. Ann Arbor : CRC Press.
29. Dyke, G. J., Gulas, B. E. Crowe, T. M. (2003). Suprageneric relationships of galliform birds (Aves, Galliformes): a cladistic analysis of morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 137, 227 244.
30. Ericson, P. G. (1996). The skeletal evidence for a sister group relationship of anseriform and galliform birds- a critical evaluation. Journal of Avian Biology, 27, 195 202.
31. Ericson, P. G. (1997). Systematic relationships of the paleogene family Presbyornithidae (Aves: Anseriformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 121, 429 483.
32. FAO 2007). FAO Statistical Yearbook pp. 2005 2006). Rome : FAO.
33. Felsenstein, J. (1985a). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783 791.
34. Felsenstein, J. (1985b). Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist, 125, 1 15.
35. Frank-Hoeflich, K., Silveira, L. F., Estudillo-López, J., García-Koch, A. M., Ongay-Larios, L. Piñero, D. (2007). Increased taxon and character sampling reveals novel intergeneric relationships in the Cracidae (Aves: Galliformes). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 45, 242 254.
36. Gatesy, J., Matthee, C., DeSalle, R. Hayashi, C. (2002). Resolution of a supertree/supermatrix paradox. Systematic Biology, 51, 652 664.
37. Gutierrez, R. J., Zink, R. M. Yang, S. Y. (1983). Genic variation, systematic, and biogeographic relationships of some galliform birds. Auk, 100, 33 47.
38. Gutierrez, R. J., Barrowclough, G. F. Groth, J. G. (2000). A classification of the grouse (Aves: Tetraoninae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Wildlife Biology, 6, 205 211.
39. Harvey, P. H. Pagel, M. D. (1991). The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
40. Holman, J. A. (1961). Osteology of living and fossil new world quails (Aves, Galliformes). Bulletin of Florida State of Museum Biological Sciences, 6, 131 233.
41. del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. Sargatal, J. (1992). Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 1. Barcelona : Lynx Ediciones.
42. del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. Sargatal, J. (1994). Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 2. Barcelona : Lynx Ediciones.
43. IUCN 2007 December). IUCN red list of threatened species. Available via http://www.iucnredlist.org/.
44. Johnsgard, P. A. (1965). Handbook of Waterfowl Behavior. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
45. Johnsgard, P. A. (1983). The Grouse of the World. Lincoln : University of Nebraska Press.
46. Jones, D. N., Dekker, R. W. R. J. Roselaar, C. S. (1995). The Megapodes: Megapodiidae. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
47. Jones, K. E., Purvis, A., MacLarnon, A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. Simmons, N. B. (2002). A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Biological Reviews, 77, 223 259.
48. Jønsson, K. A. Fjeldså, J. (2006). A phylogenetic supertree of oscine passerine birds (Aves: Passeri). Zoologica Scripta, 35, 149 186.
49. Keane, A., Brooke, M. D. L. Mcgowan, P. J. K. (2005). Correlates of extinction risk and hunting pressure in gamebirds (Galliformes). Biological Conservation, 126, 216 233.
50. Kear, J. (2005). Ducks, Geese and Swans. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
51. Kennedy, M. Page, R. D. M. (2002). Seabird supertrees: combining partial estimates of Procellariform phylogeny. Auk, 119, 88 108.
52. Kolm, N., Stein, R. W., Verspoor, J. J., Mooers, A. O. Cunningham, E. J. (2007). Can sexual selection drive female life histories? A comparative study on galliform birds. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 627 638.
53. Kriegs, J. O., Matzke, A., Churakov, G., Kuritzin, A., Mayr, G., Brosius, J. Schmitz, J. (2007). Waves of genomic hitchhikers shed light on the evolution of gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 190.
54. Levasseur, C. Lapointe, F.-J. (2003). Increasing Phylogenetic Accuracy with Global Congruence. In M. F. Janowitz, F.-J. Lapointe, F. R. McMorris, B. Mirkin F. S. Roberts (Eds) Bioconsensus (pp. 221 230) DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Sciences, Vol. 61. American Mathematical Society.
55. Livezey, B. C. (1991). A phylogenetic analysis and classification of recent dabbling ducks (tribe Anatini) based on comparative morphology. Auk, 108, 471 507.
56. Livezey, B. C. (1997). A phylogenetic classification of waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes), including selected fossil species. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 66, 457 496.
57. Maddison, D. R. Maddison, W. P. (2000). Macclade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 4.0. Sunderland : Sinauer Associates.
58. Nixon, K. C. (1999). The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics, 15, 407 414.
59. Olson, S. L. Fecuccia, A. (1980). Presbyornis and the origin of Anseriformes. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 323, 1 24.
60. PACEC 2007 August). The economic and environmental impact of sports hunting. Available via http://www.Shootingfacts.Co.Uk/.
61. Piaggio-Talice, R., Burleigh, J. G. Eulenstein, O. (2004). Quartet supertrees. In O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds (ed.) Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life (pp. 173 191) Dordrecht : Kluwer.
62. Pisani, D., Yates, A. M., Langer, M. C. Benton, M. J. (2002). A genus-level supertree of the Dinosauria. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 269, 915 921.
63. Prager, E. M. Wilson, A. C. (1976). Congruency of phylogenies derived from different proteins: a molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of cracid birds. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 9, 45 57.
64. Price, S. A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. Gittleman, J. L. (2005). A complete phylogeny of the whales, dolphins and even-toed hoofed mammals (Cetartiodactyla). Biological Reviews, 80, 445 473.
65. Purvis, A. (1995). A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 348, 405 421.
66. Ragan, M. A. (1992). Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1, 53 58.
67. Salamin, N., Hodkinson, T. R. Savolainen, V. (2002). Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae). Systematic Biology, 51, 136 150.
68. Sanderson, M. J., Donoghue, M. J., Piel, W. Eriksson, T. (1994). TreeBASE: a prototype database of phylogenetic analyses and an interactive tool for browsing the phylogeny of life. American Journal of Botany, 81, 183.
69. Sanderson, M. J., Purvis, A. Henze, C. (1998). Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 105 109.
70. Sanderson, M. J., Driskell, A. C., Ree, R. H., Eulenstein, O. Langley, S. (2003). Obtaining maximal concatenated phylogenetic data sets from large sequence databases. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20, 1036 1042.
71. Sibley, C. G. Ahlquist, J. E. (1990). Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: a Study in Molecuular Evolution. New Heaven : Yale University Press.
72. Sorenson, M. D., Oneal, E., Garcia-Moreno, J. Mindell, D. P. (2003). More taxa, more characters: the hoatzin problem is still unresolved. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20, 1484 1499.
73. Springer, M. S. de Jong, W. W. (2001). Phylogenetics: which mammalian supertree to bark up? Science, 291, 1709 1711.
74. Swofford, D. L. (2002). Paup*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts : Sinauer Associates.
75. Thomas, G. H., Wills, M. A. Szekely, T. (2004). A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 4, 28.
76. USDA 2007 August). Poultry yearbook. Available Via (http://usda.Mannlib. Cornell.Edu/mannusda/viewdocumentinfo.Do?Documentid=1367).
77. USFWS 2007 August). Economic Analysis of the Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations for the 2007-08 Season. Available Via (http://www.Fws.Gov/ migratorybirds/reports/specialtopics/economicanalysis-2007update.Pdf).
78. Wetmore, A. (1960). A classification for the birds of the world. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection, 139, 1 37.
79. Wilkinson, M., Cotton, J. A., Creevey, C., Eulenstein, O., Harris, S. R., Lapointe, F.-J., Levasseur, C., McInerney, J. O., Pisani, D. Thorley, J. L. (2005). The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods. Systematic Biology, 54, 419 431.
80. Wilkinson, M., Cotton, J. A., Lapointe, F.-J. Pisani, D. (2007). Properties of supertree methods in the consensus setting. Systematic Biology, 56, 330 337.
81. Woolfenden, G. (1961). Post-cranial osteology of the waterfowl. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum Biological Sciences, 6, 1 129.