Getting to the roots of matrix representation

Systematic Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 668-672

  Bininda Emonds, Olaf R P ^a   Beck, Robin M D ^b,c   Purvis, Andy ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW;

CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 25144456389     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150590947113     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Amrine-Madsen, H., K. P. Koepfli, R. K. Wayne, and M. S. Springer. 2003. A new phylogenetic marker, apolipoprotein B, provides compelling evidence for eutherian relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28:225-240.
2. Arnason, U., J. A. Adegoke, K. Bodin, E. W. Born, Y. B. Esa, A. Gullberg, M. Nilsson, R. V. Short, X. Xu, and A. Janke. 2002. Mammalian mitogenomic relationships and the root of the eutherian tree. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:8151-8156.
3. Asher, R. J., M. J. Novacek, and J. H. Geisler. 2003. Relationships of endemic African mammals and their fossil relatives based on morphological and molecular evidence. J. Mamm. Evol. 10:131-194.
4. Baum, B. R. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3-10.
5. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. 2004. Trees versus characters and the supertree/supermatrix "paradox". Syst. Biol. 53:356-359.
6. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., and H. N. Bryant. 1998. Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. Syst. Biol. 47:497-508.
7. Böcker, S. 2004. Unrooted supertrees: Limitations, traps, and phylogenetic patchworks. Pages 331-351 in Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the Tree of Life (O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, ed.). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
8. Chen, D., O. Eulenstein, and D. Fernández-Baca. 2004. Rainbow: A toolbox for phylogenetic supertree construction and analysis. Bioinformatics 20:2872-2873.
9. Donoghue, M. J., and S. Mathews. 1998. Duplicate genes and the root of angiosperms, with an example using phytochrome sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:489-500.
10. Farris, J. S., A. G. Kluge, and M. J. Eckhardt. 1970. A numerical approach to phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 19:172-191.
11. Gatesy, J., C. Matthee, R. DeSalle, and C. Hayashi. 2002. Resolution of a supertree/supermatrix paradox. Syst. Biol. 51:652-664.
12. Huelsenbeck, J. P., J. P. Bollback, and A. M. Levine. 2002. Inferring the root of a phylogenetic tree. Syst. Biol. 51:32-43.
13. Lin, Y.-H., P. A. McLenachan, A. R. Gore, M. J. Phillips, R. Ota, M. D. Hendy, and D. Penny. 2002. Four new mitochondrial genomes and the increased stability of evolutionary trees of mammals from improved taxon sampling. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2060-2070.
14. Liu, F.-G. R., M. M. Miyamoto, N. P. Freire, P. Q. Ong, M. R. Tennant, T. S. Young, and K. F. Gugel. 2001. Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals. Science 291:1786-1789.
15. Maddison, D. R., and W. P. Maddison. 2000. MacClade 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
16. Maddison, W. P., M. J. Donoghue, and D. R. Maddison. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33:83-103.
17. Mathews, S., and M. J. Donoghue. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286:947-950.
18. Mathews, S., and M. J. Donoghue. 2000. Basal angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochromes A and C. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 161:S41-S55.
19. Messenger, S. L., and J. A. McGuire. 1998. Morphology, molecules, and the phylogenetics of cetaceans. Syst. Biol. 47:90-124.
20. Misawa, K., and A. Janke. 2003. Revisiting the Glires concept - phylogenetic analysis of nuclear sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28:320-327.
21. Murphy, W. J., E. Eizirik, S. J. O'Brien, O. Madsen, M. Scally, C. J. Douady, E. Teeling, O. A. Ryder, M. J. Stanhope, W. W. de Jong, and M. S. Springer. 2001. Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science 294:2348-2351.
22. Piaggio-Talice, R., J. G. Burleigh, and O. Eulenstein. 2004. Quartet supertrees. Pages 173-191 in Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the Tree of Life (O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, ed.). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
23. Purvis, A. 1995. A modification to Baum and Ragan's method for combining phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 44:251-255.
24. Ragan, M. A. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:53-58.
25. Rokas, A., and P. W. Holland. 2000. Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:454-459.
26. Sharrock, R. A., and S. Mathews. In press. Phytochrome genes in higher plants: Structure, expression, and evolution. In Photomorphogenesis in plants, 3rd ed. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
27. Shoshani, J., and M. C. McKenna. 1998. Higher taxonomic relationships among extant mammals based on morphology, with selected comparisons of results from molecular data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:572-584.
28. Springer, M. S., M. J. Stanhope, O. Madsen, and W. W. de Jong. 2004. Molecules consolidate the placental mammal tree. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:430-438.
29. Steel, M., A. W. M. Dress, and S. Böcker. 2000. Simple but fundamental limitations on supertree and consensus tree methods. Syst. Biol. 49:363-368.
30. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
31. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
32. Wilkinson, M., J. L. Thorley, D. T. J. Littlewood, and R. A. Bray. 2001. Towards a phylogenetic supertree of Platyhelminthes? Pages 292-301 in Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes (D. T. J. Littlewood and R. A. Bray, eds.). Taylor and Francis, London.
33. Wilkinson, M., J. L. Thorley, D. Pisani, F.-J. Lapointe, and J. O. McInerney. 2004. Some desiderata for liberal supertrees. Pages 227-246 in Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the Tree of Life (O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, ed.) Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.