Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time?

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1564-1569

  Cao, Caroline G L ^a   Zhou, Mi ^a   Jones, Daniel B ^b   Schwaitzberg, Steven D ^c  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

^b BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Cambridge Health Alliance ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive loading; Haptic feedback; Surgical training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; SURGERY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; SURGERY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 35148838672     PISSN: 1091255X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0279-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Strasber SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1995;180:101-125.
2. Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, Liu K, Lee CM, Whang K, Hunter JG. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries-Analysis of 25 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 2003;237:460-469.
3. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, Euhus DM, Jeyarajah DR, Thompson WM, Jones DB. Laparoscopic training on bench models: Better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 2000;191(3):272-283.
4. Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, O'Brien M, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomised, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002;236:458-463.
5. Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ. Surgical Simulation: A systematic review. Ann Surg 2006;243(3):291-300.
6. Perreault JO, Cao CGL. Effects of vision and friction on haptic perception. Hum Factors 2006;48(3):574-586.
7. Picod G, Jambon AC, Vinatier D, Dubois P. What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 2005;19:95-100.
8. Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM. Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:349-355.
9. Brydges R, Carnahan H, Dubrowski A. Surface exploration using laparoscopic surgical instruments: The perception of surface roughness. Ergonomics 2005;48(7):874-894.
10. Tang B, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Analysis of errors enacted by surgical trainees during skills training courses. Surgery 2005;138:14-20.
11. Menciassi A, Eisinberg A, Carrozza MC, Dario P. Force sensing microinstrument for measuring tissue properties and pulse in microsurgery. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2003;8(1):10-17.
12. Rosen J, Hannaford B, MacFarlane MP, Sinanan MN. Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery: Experimental performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999;46(10):1212-1221.
13. Ottensmeyer MP, Salisbury JK. In vivo mechanical tissue property measurement for improved simulations. Proc Soc Photo-Opt Instrum Eng (SPIE) 2000;4037:286-293.
14. Hassan I, Maschuw K, Rothmund M, Koller M, Gerdes B. Novices in surgery are the target group of a virtual reality training laboratory. Eur Surg Res 2006;38:109-113.
15. Aggarwal R, Black SA, Hance JR, Darzi A, Cheshire NJW. Virtual Reality simulation training can improve inexperienced surgeons' endovascular skills. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;31:588-593.
16. Adams RJ, Klowden D, Hannaford B. Virtual Training for a manual assembly task. Haptics-e 2001; 2(2), retrieved October 17, http://www.haptics-e.org.
17. Kitagawa M, Okamura AM, Bethea BT, Gott VL, Baumgartner WA. Analysis of suture manipulation forces for teleoperation with force feedback. In Dohi T, Kikinis R, eds. MICCAI 2002, LNCS 2488, pp 155-162.
18. Tholey G, Desai JP, Castellanos AE. Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery. Ann Surg 2005;241:102-109.
19. Lamata P, Gomez EJ, Sanchez-Margallo FM, Lamata F, Antolin M, Rodriguez S, Oltra A, Uson J. Study of laparoscopic forces perception for defining simulation fidelity. In Westwood JD, ed. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, vol. 14. IOS Press, 2006, pp 288-292.
20. Wagner CR, Stylopoulos N, Howe RD. The role of force feedback in surgery: Analysis of blunt dissection. Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Orlando, FL, March 2002, pp. 68-74.
21. Heijnsdijk EAM, Pasdeloup A, Van der Pijl AJ, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ. The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically. Surg Endosc 2004;18:980-985.
22. Higgins GA, Champion HR. The military simulation experience: Charting the vision for simulation training in combat trauma, US army medical research and material command, Fort Detrick, MD DAMD17-99-9028, 2000.
23. Gandsas A, Adrales GL, Park AE. Simulation in general surgery. In Loyd GE, Lake CL, Greenberg RB, eds. Practical health care simulations. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2004.
24. Goodell KH, Cao CGL, Schwaitzberg SD. Effects of cognitive distraction on performance of laparoscopic surgical tasks. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2006;16(2):94-98.
25. Pool M, Koolstra C, Van Der Voort T. Distraction effects of background soap operas on homework performance: An experimental study enriched with observational data. Educ Psychol 2003;23:361-380.
26. Weerdesteyn V, Schillings A, van Galen G, Duysens J. Distraction affects the performance of obstacle avoidance during walking. J Mot Behav 2003;35:53-63.