Prosthesis-patient mismatch is less frequent and more clinically indolent in patients operated for aortic insufficiency

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 138, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 639-645

  Price, Joel ^a   Lapierre, Harry ^a   Ressler, Ladislaus ^a   Lam, Buu Khanh ^a   Mesana, Thierry G ^a   Ruel, Marc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FAILURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHETIC VALVE DYSFUNCTION; SURVIVAL RATE;

AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FITTING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT; VENTRICULAR REMODELING;

EID: 68749115079     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de LA Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 20061;48:e1-148.
2. Howell N.J., Keogh B.E., Barnet V., Bonser R.S., Graham T.R., Rooney S.J., et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 (2006) 10-14
3. Flameng W., Meuris B., Herijgers P., and Herregods M.C. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is not clinically relevant in aortic valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve. Ann Thorac Surg 82 (2006) 530-536
4. Fuster R.G., Montero Argudo J.A., Albarova O.G., Sos F.H., Lopez S.C., Codoner M.B., et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27 (2005) 441-449
5. Tasca G., Brunelli F., Cirillo M., DallaTomba M., Mhagna Z., Troise G., et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 79 (2005) 505-510
6. Mohty-Echahidi D., Malouf J.F., Girard S.E., Schaff H.V., Grill D.E., Enriquez-Sarano M.E., et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 113 (2006) 420-426
7. Ruel M., Rubens F.D., Masters R.G., Pipe A.L., Bedard P., Hendry P.J., et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127 (2004) 149-159
8. Rao V., Jamieson W.R., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., and David T.E. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 102 suppl 3 (2000) III5-III9
9. Blais C., Dumesnil J.G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., and Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108 (2003) 983-988
10. Ruel M., Al-Faleh H., Kulik A., Chan K.L., Mesana T.G., and Burwash I.G. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131 (2006) 1036-1044
11. Moon M.R., Pasque M.K., Munfakh N.A., Melby S.J., Lawton J.S., Moazami N., et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006) 481-488
12. Walther T., Rastan A., Falk V., Lehmann S., Garbade J., Funkat A.K., et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 (2006) 15-19
13. Kulik A., Burwash I.G., Kapila V., Mesana T.G., and Ruel M. Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 114 suppl (2006) I553-I558
14. Ruel M., Masters R.G., Rubens F.D., Bedard P.J., Pipe A.L., Goldstein W.G., et al. Late incidence and determinants of stroke after aortic and mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 78 (2004) 77-83
15. Akins C.W., Miller D.C., Turina M.I., Kouchoukos N.T., Blackstone E.H., Grunkemeier G.L., et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135 (2008) 732-738
16. Pibarot P., and Dumesnil J.G. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 36 (2000) 1131-1141
17. Sahn D.J., DeMaria A., Kisslo J., and Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 58 (1978) 1072-1083
18. Devereux R.B., Alonso D.R., Lutas E.M., Gottlieb G.J., Campo E., Sachs I., et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 57 (1986) 450-458
19. McGowan J.H., and Cleland J.G. Reliability of reporting left ventricular systolic function by echocardiography: a systematic review of 3 methods. Am Heart J 146 (2003) 388-397
20. Krayenbuehl H.P., Hess O.M., Monrad E.S., Schneider J., Mall G., and Turina M. Left ventricular myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before, intermediate, and late after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 79 (1989) 744-755
21. Ruel M., Kulik A., Rubens F.D., Bedard P., Masters R.G., Pipe A.L., et al. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25 (2004) 364-370
22. Rahimtoola S.H. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 58 (1978) 20-24
23. Dumesnil J.G., and Pibarot P. Prosthesis-patient mismatch and clinical outcomes: the evidence continues to accumulate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131 (2006) 952-955
24. Sasayama S., Ross Jr. J., Franklin D., Bloor C.M., Bishop S., and Dilley R.B. Adaptations of the left ventricle to chronic pressure overload. Circ Res 38 (1976) 172-178
25. Bleiziffer S., Eichinger W.B., Hettich I., Guenzinger R., Ruzicka D., Bauernschmitt R., et al. Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method?. Heart 93 (2007) 615-620
26. Vandervoort P.M., Greenberg N.L., Powell K.A., Cosgrove D.M., and Thomas J.D. Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position. Circulation 92 (1995) 3464-3472
27. Henneke K.H., Pongratz G., and Bachmann K. Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of prosthetic valve hemodynamics. J Heart Valve Dis 4 (1995) 18-25
28. Baumgartner H., Khan S., DeRobertis M., Czer L., and Maurer G. Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 19 (1992) 324-332