Computational prediction of the specificities of proteasome interaction with antigen protein

Cellular and Molecular Immunology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 135-142

  Liu, Tao ^a   Liu, Wei ^a   Song, Zhe ^a   Jiao, Chunbo ^a   Zhu, Minghua ^a   Wang, Xiaogang ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Major histocompatibility complex; Proteasome; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

PROTEASOME; ANTIGEN; HLA ANTIGEN CLASS 1; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; ARTICLE; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; PREDICTION; PROTEIN CLEAVAGE; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ANIMAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; GENETICS; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; METABOLISM; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; ANTIGEN SPECIFICITY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PROTEIN TARGETING;

EUKARYOTA;

ANIMALS; ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; ANTIGENS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS CLASS I; HUMANS; PEPTIDES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 68549090881     PISSN: 16727681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cmi.2009.19     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adams J. The proteasome: structure, function, and role in the cell. Cancer Treat Rev. 2003;29:3-9. (Pubitemid 36626287)
2. Smith D, Benaroudj N, Goldberg AL. Proteasomes and their associated ATPases: A destructive combination. J Structural Biol. 2006;156:72-83. (Pubitemid 44486067)
3. Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:801-847. (Pubitemid 26255262)
4. Heinemeyer W, Ramos PC, Dohmen RJ. The ultimate nanoscale mincer: assembly, structure and active sites of the 20S proteasome core. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61:1562-1578. (Pubitemid 38962039)
5. Nussbaum AK, Kuttler C, Hadeler KP, Rammensee HG, Schild H. PAProC: a prediction algorithm for proteasomal cleavages available on the WWW. Immunogenetics. 2001;53:87-94.
6. Holzhütter HG, Kloetzel PM. A kinetic model of vertebrate 20S proteasome accounting for the generation of major proteolytic fragments from oligomeric peptide substrates. Biophysical J. 2000;79:1196-1205.
7. Kesmir C, Nussbaum AK, Schild H, Detours V, Brunak S. Prediction of proteasome cleavage motifs by neural networks. Protein Eng. 2002;15:287-296. (Pubitemid 34532767)
8. Bhasin M, Raghava GPS. Pcleavage: an SVM based method for prediction of constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome cleavage sites in antigenic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:202-207. (Pubitemid 44529909)
9. Ginodi I, Vider-Shalit T, Tsaban L, Louzoun Y. Precise score for the prediction of peptides cleaved by the proteasome. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:477-483. (Pubitemid 351256290)
10. Goldberg AL, Cascio P, Saric T, Rock KL. The importance of the proteasome and subsequent proteolytic steps in the generation of antigenic peptides. Mol Immunol. 2002;39:147-164. (Pubitemid 35013508)
11. Blythe MJ, Doytchinova IA, Flower DR. JenPep: a database of quantitative functional peptide data for immunology. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:434-439.
12. Saxova P, Buus S, Brunak S, Kesmir C. Predicting proteasomal cleavage sites: a comparison of available methods. Int Immunol. 2003;15:781-787. (Pubitemid 36827066)
13. Burges CJC. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 1998;2:121-167. (Pubitemid 128695475)
14. Keerthi SS, Shevade SK, Bhattacharyya C, Murthy KRK. Improvements to platt's SMO algorithm for SVM classifier design. Neural Comput. 2001;13:637-649. (Pubitemid 33595014)
15. Bhasin M, Raghava GP. Prediction of CTL epitopes using QM, SVM and ANN techniques. Vaccine. 2004;22:3195-3204.
16. Altuvia Y, Margalit H. Sequence signals for generation of antigenic peptides by the proteasome: implications for proteasomal cleavage mechanism. J Mol Biol. 2000;295:879-890. (Pubitemid 30700932)
17. Wenzel T, Eckerskorn C, Lottspeich F, Baumeister W. Existence of a molecular ruler in proteasomes suggested by analysis of degradation products. FEBS Lett. 1994;349:205-209. (Pubitemid 24263263)
18. Kisselev AF, Akopian TN, Woo KM, Goldberg AL. The sizes of peptides generated from protein by mammalian 26 and 20 S proteasomes. Implications for understanding the degradative mechanism and antigen presentation. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:3363-3371.
19. Dick LR, Moomaw CR, DeMartino GN, Slaughter CA. Degradation of oxidized insulin B chain by the multiproteinase complex macropain (proteasome). Biochemistry. 1991;30:2725-2734.
20. Altuvia Y, Margalit H. A structure-based approach for prediction of MHC-binding peptides. Methods. 2004;34:454-459. (Pubitemid 39469052)
21. Falk K, Rotzschke O, Stevanovic S, Jung G, Rammensee HG. Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules. Nature. 1991;351:290-296. (Pubitemid 21896578)
22. Nussbaum AK, Dick TP, Keilholz W, et al. Cleavage motifs of the yeast 20S proteasome β subunits deduced from digests of enolase 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:12504-12509. (Pubitemid 28483794)
23. Unno M, Mizushima T, Morimoto Y, et al. The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 A resolution. Structure. 2002;10:609-618. (Pubitemid 34518706)
24. Song Z, Liu T, Liu W, Zhu MH, Wang XG. The QSAR model study of interaction between peptides and MHC molecules. Acta Phys Chim Sin. 2007;23:198-205.
25. Liu T, Song Z, Liu W, Wang XY, Qiu XM. Prediction of CTL epitopes based on modified artificial neural network. J Dalian Univ Technol. 2007;47:473-478. (Pubitemid 47453129)
26. Song Z, Liu T, Wang XY, Liu W. Application of partial least square method in studying of the quantitative structure-activity relationship of T cells epitopes. Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007;23:166-171.