Do paper-and-pencil tests give an accurate measure of stereotype strength? A review of available data

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 904-912

  Hoffmann, Errol R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH   (Macao)

Author keywords

Controls and displays; Simulations; Stereotypes; Validity of simulations

Indexed keywords

CONTROL ERRORS; PAPER TESTS; PROPER DESIGN; REACTION TIME; SIMULATIONS; STEREOTYPES; VALIDITY OF SIMULATIONS;

TESTING;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DISPLAY SYSTEM; DRAWING; EVALUATION; MACHINE; MEASUREMENT; PAPER; PHYSICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STEREOTYPY; VALIDITY;

EID: 68349135412     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brebner, J., Sandow, B., 1976. The effect of scale side on population stereotype. Ergonomics 19(5), 571-580.
2. Chan W.H., and Chan A.H.S. Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display - computer simulated test and real hardware test. Applied Ergonomics 34 (2003) 61-71
3. Chan A.H.S., and Chan W.H. Strength and reversibility of stereotypes for a rotary control with linear scales. Perceptual and Motor Skills 106 (2008) 341-353
4. Chan A.H.S., and Chan W.H. Movement compatibility for circular display and rotary controls positioned at peculiar positions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36 (2006) 737-745
5. Chapanis A., and Lindenbaum L.E. A reaction time study of four control-display linkages. Human Factors 1 4 (1959) 1-7
6. Courtney A.J. Chinese response preferences for display-control arrangements. Human Factors 30 3 (1988) 367-372
7. Courtney A.J. Control-display stereotypes for multicultural user systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 22 4 (1992) 681-687
8. Courtney A.J. Hong Kong Chinese direction-of-motion stereotypes. Ergonomics 37 3 (1994) 417-426
9. Courtney A.J. The effect of scale-side, indicator type, and control plane on direction-of-turn stereotypes for Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Ergonomics 37 5 (1994) 865-877
10. Duncan J. Response selection rules in spatial choice reaction tasks. In: Dornic S. (Ed). Attention and Performance VI (1977), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 49-71
11. Evans O.M., and Kwok W. Pencil-and-paper and realistic tests of control stereotypes in two types of water tap. Proceedings of 28th Annual Conference, December 1992 (1992), Ergonomics Society of Australia 56-62
12. Hoffmann E.R., Brown C., and Morgan S. Stereotypes for operation of water taps. Proceedings of 28th Annual Conference, December 1992 (1992), Ergonomics Society of Australia 63-71
13. Hoffmann E.R. Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes - linear displays with rotary controls. Ergonomics 40 2 (1997) 199-222
14. Hoffmann, E.R., Whitfield, R.C., Students of Design Studio III. Stereotypes for water tap operation: the role of testing realism. Submitted for publication.
15. Hoffmann, E.R., 2008. Warrick's principle, implied linkages and the effect of hand/control location. Unpublished report available from the author.
16. Hotta A., Takahashi T., Takahashi K., and Kogi K. Relations between direction-of-motion stereotypes for controls in living space. Journal of Human Ergology 10 (1981) 73-82
17. Hsu S.H., and Peng Y. Control/display relationship of the four-burner stove: a re-examination. Human Factors 35 4 (1993) 745-749
18. Leong, W.-S., Hiew, Y.-K., 1995. Expectancies for tap operation. Unpublished student project. Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Melbourne.
19. Loveless N.E. Direction-of-motion stereotypes: a review. Ergonomics 5 (1962) 357-383
20. Naqvi S.A., and Jabbar A.B. Population stereotype of human movement. Journal of Human Movement Studies 26 (1994) 67-73
21. Payne S.J. Naïve judgments of stimulus-response compatibility. Human Factors 37 3 (1995) 495-506
22. Petropoulos H., and Brebner J. Stereotypes for direction-of-motion of rotary controls associated with linear displays: the effects of scale presence and position, of pointer direction, and distances between the control and the display. Ergonomics 24 2 (1981) 143-151
23. Proctor R.W., and Vu K.-P. Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory and Application (2006), CRC Press
24. Ray R.D., and Ray W.D. An analysis of domestic cooker control design. Ergonomics 22 (1979) 1243-1248
25. Shinar D., and Acton M.B. Control-display relationships on the four-burner range: population stereotypes versus standard. Human Factors 20 (1978) 13-17
26. Smith S.L. Exploring compatibility with words and pictures. Human Factors 23 3 (1981) 305-315
27. Tlauka M. Display-control compatibility: the relationship between performance and judgments of performance. Ergonomics 47 3 (2004) 281-295
28. Vu K.-P., and Proctor R.W. Naïve and experienced judgements of stimulus-response compatibility: implications for interface design. Ergonomics 46 1-3 (2003) 169-187
29. Wu S.-P. Further studies on the spatial compatibility of four control-display linkages. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 19 (1997) 353-360