Strength and reversibility of stereotypes for a rotary control with linear scales

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 341-353

  Chan, Alan H S ^a   Chan, W H ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENGINEERING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PRODUCTIVITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; ROTATION; STATISTICS; STEREOTYPY;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; DATA DISPLAY; EFFICIENCY; ENGINEERING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RESEARCH DESIGN; ROTATION; STEREOTYPED BEHAVIOR;

EID: 41849098453     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PMS.106.1.341-353     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BREBNER, J., & SANDOW, B. (1976) The effect of scale side on population stereotype. Ergonomics, 19, 571-580.
2. CAREY, J. R., BOGARD, C. L., YOUDAS, J. W., & SUMAN, V. J. (1995) Stimulus-response compatibility effects in a manual tracking task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 155-170.
3. CHAN, A. H. S., & CHAN, W. H. (2006) Movement compatibility for circular display and rotary controls positioned at peculiar positions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 737-745.
4. CHAN, A. H. S., COURTNEY, A. T., & SO, K. W. Y. (2000) Circular displays with thumbwheels: Hong Kong Chinese preferences. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 10, 453-463.
5. CHAN, A. H. S., SHUM, V. W. Y., LAW, H. W., & HUI, I. K. (2003) Precise effects of control position, indicator type, and scale side on human performance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 22, 380-386.
6. CHAN, W. H., & CHAN, A. H. S. (2003) Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display: computer simulated test and real hardware test. Applied Ergonomics, 34, 61-67.
7. CHAN, W. H., & CHAN, A. H. S. (2006a) A study on movement compatibility for lever control and circular display with computer simulated test. Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS), 20-22 June 2006. Pp. 625-629.
8. CHAN, W. H., & CHAN, A. H. S. (2006b) Hardware test on movement compatibility for rotary control and digital display. Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS). 20-22 June 2006. Pp. 721-725.
9. CHAN, W. H., & CHAN, A. H. S. (2007a) Movement compatibility for lever control and circular display. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, 233-244.
10. CHAN, W. H., & CHAN, A. H. S. (2007b) Movement compatibility for lever control with digital counter in man machine interface. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A.
11. COURTNEY, A. J. (1991) Strength of stereotypes response time for linear displays and rotary controls. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 573-574.
12. COURTNEY, A. J. (1994a) The effect of scale-side, indicator type, and control plane on direction-of-turn stereotypes for Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Ergonomics, 37, 865-877.
13. COURTNEY, A. J. (1994b) Hong Kong Chinese direction-of-motion stereotypes. Ergonomics, 37, 417-426.
14. FITTS, P. M. (1951) Engineering psychology and equipment design. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley. Pp. 1287-1340.
15. GRANDJEAN, E. (1988) Fitting the task to the man. London: Taylor & Francis.
16. HOFFMANN, E. R. (1997) Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes-linear displays with rotary controls. Ergonomics, 40(2), 199-222.
17. HOFFMANN, E. R., BROWN, C., & MORGAN, S. (1992) Stereotypes for operation of water taps. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia, Inc. Melbourne, Australia, 2-4 December 1992. Edited by E. Hoffmann & O. Evans. Downer, ACT, Australia: Ergonomics Society of Australia, Inc. Pp. 63-71.
18. HOTTA, A., & YOSHIOKA, M. (1988) Experiment on direction-of-motion stereotypes for indicator or figure control. Ergonomics International 88: Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. Sydney, Australia, 1-5 August 1988. Edited by A. S. Adams, R. R. Hall, B. J. McPhee, & M. S. Oxenburgh. London: Taylor & Francis. Pp. 154-156.
19. KANG, H. Y., & SEONG, P. H. (2001) Information theoretic approach to man-machine interface complexity evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 31(3), 163-171.
20. KRUK, R. V., RUNNINGS, D. W., MCK INNON, G. M., & LIPPAY, A. L. (1985) Simulation fidelity: is it real or is it virtual? Proceedings of the Human Factors Assodation of Canada, 18th Annual Meeting. Hull, Quebec, 27-28 September 1985. Rexsdale, Ont. Can.: HFAC. Pp. 115-118.
21. LOVELESS, N. E. (1962) Direction-of-motion stereotypes: a review. Ergonomics, 5, 357-383.
22. PETROPOULOS, H., & BREBNER, J. (1981) Stereotypes for direction-of-movement of rotary controls associated with linear displays: the effects of scale presence and position, of pointer direction, and distances between the control and the display. Ergonomics, 24, 143-151.
23. ROSS, S., SHEPP, B. E., & ANDREWS, T. G. (1955) Response preferences in display-control relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 39, 425-428.
24. SANDERS, M. S., & MCCORMICK, E. J. (1993) Human control of systems. In Human factors in engineering and design. Singapore: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 301-334.
25. WARRICK, M. J. (1947) Direction of movement in the use of control knobs to position visual indicators. In P. M. Fitts (Ed.), Psychological research on equipment design. Army Air Force Aviation Psychology Program Research Department. Pp. 137-146.
26. WORRINGHAM, C. J., & BERINGER, D. B. (1998) Direction stimulus-response compatibility: a test of three alternative principles. Ergonomics, 41(6), 864-880.
27. YU, R. F., & CHAN, A. H. S. (2004) Comparative research on response stereotypes for daily operation tasks of Chinese and American engineering students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 179-191.