Display-control compatibility: The relationship between performance and judgements of performance

Ergonomics

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 281-295

  Tlauka, Michael ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Display control compatibility; Judgements; Performance; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY DEVICES; ERROR ANALYSIS; MAPPING; SEMANTICS;

DISPLAY-CONTROL COMPATIBILITY; SPATIAL CONGRUENCE;

ERGONOMICS;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DISPLAY SYSTEM; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEMANTICS; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DATA DISPLAY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 1042281009     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0014013031000157931     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Chapanis, A. and Lindenbaum, L. E. 1959, A reaction time study of four control-display linkages, Human Factors, 1, 1-7.
2. Clark, H. H. and Brownell, H. H. 1975, Judging up and down, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 339-352.
3. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S. and Giraux, P. 1993, The mental representation of parity and number magnitude, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 371-396.
4. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C. and Lauber, E. 1994, Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
5. Duncan, J. 1977, Response selection rules in spatial choice reaction tasks, in S. Dornic (ed), Attention and performance VI (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 49-71.
6. Dyer, F. N. 1972, Latencies for movement naming with congruent and incongruent word stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 377-380.
7. Eimer, M. 1995, Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
8. Fitts, P. M. and Seeger, C. M. 1953, S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
9. Hommel, B. and Prinz, W. (eds) 1997, Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
10. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. and Osman, A. 1990, Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy, Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
11. Ladavas, E. and Moscovitch, M. 1984, Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 205-215.
12. Nicoletti, R., Anzola, G. P., Luppino, G., Rizzolatti, G. and Umilta, C. 1982, Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 664-673.
13. Oborne, D. J. 1987, Ergonomics at work (2nd edn) (Chichester: Wiley).
14. Payne, S. J. 1995, Naive judgments of stimulus-response compatibility, Human Factors, 37, 495-506.
15. Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L. and Umilta, C. 1986, What is crossed in crossed-hand effects, Acta Psychologica, 62, 89-100.
16. Roswarski, T. E. and Proctor, R. W. 1996, Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks, Psychological Research, 59, 196-211.
17. Sanders, M. S. and McCormick, E. J. 1993, Human factors in engineering and design (7th edn) (New York: McGraw-Hill).
18. Simon, J. R. 1990, The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing, in R. W. Proctor and T. G. Reeve (eds), Stimulus-Response Compatibility (Amsterdam: North-Holland), 31-86.
19. Smith, S. L. 1981, Exploring compatibility with words and pictures, Human Factors, 23, 305-315.
20. Tlauka, M. and McKenna, F. P. 2000, Hierarchical knowledge influences stimulus-response compatibility effects, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 85-103.
21. Umilta, C. and Nicoletti, R. 1990, Spatial stimulus-response compatibility, in R. W. Proctor and T. G. Reeve (eds), Stimulus-Response Compatibility (Amsterdam: North-Holland), 89-116.
22. Weeks, D. J., Proctor, R. W. and Beyak, B. 1995, Stimulus-response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: evidence for spatial coding, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 367-383.