Movement compatibility for circular display and rotary controls positioned at peculiar positions

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 737-745

  Chan, Alan H S ^a   Chan, W H ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Circular display; Movement compatibility; Peculiar position; Rotary knob; Stereotype reversibility

Indexed keywords

CONTROL EQUIPMENT; CONTROL THEORY; ERGONOMICS; MOTION ESTIMATION; PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT DESIGN;

CIRCULAR DISPLAY; MOVEMENT COMPATIBILITY; PECULIAR POSITION; ROTARY KNOB; STEREOTYPE REVERSIBILITY;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROL STRATEGY; CONTROL SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTYPY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 33746319661     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brebner J., and Sandow B. The effect of scale side on population stereotype. Ergonomics 19 (1976) 571-580
2. Chan, A.H.S., Courtney, A.J., 1998. Color Associations for Hong Kong Chinese. In: Ergonomics Practice and its Theory, Proceedings of the Fifth Pan-Pacific Conferences on Occupational Ergonomics, 21-24 July, 1998. Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 298-302.
3. Chan A.H.S., Courtney A.J., and So K.W.Y. Circular displays with thumbwheels: Hong Kong Chinese preferences. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 10 4 (2000) 453-463
4. Chan W.H., and Chan A.H.S. Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display-computer simulated test and real hardware test. Applied Ergonomics 34 (2003) 61-67
5. Courtney A.J. Chinese response preferences for display-control relationships. Human Factors 30 3 (1988) 367-372
6. Courtney A.J. Hong Kong Chinese direction-of-motion stereotypes. Ergonomics 37 (1994) 417-426
7. Courtney A.J. The effect of scale-side, indicator type, and control plane on direction-of-turn stereotypes for Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Ergonomics 37 (1994) 865-877
8. Courtney, A.J., Chan, A.H.S., 1998. Testing Hong Kong stereotypes with a questionnaire. In: Ergonomics Practice and its Theory, Proceedings of the Fifth Pan-Pacific Conferences on Occupational Ergonomics, 21-24 July, 1998. Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 288-292.
9. Fitts P.M., and Simon C.W. Some relations between stimulus patterns and performance in a continuous dual pursuit task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (1952) 428-438
10. Graham N.E. Manual tracking on a horizontal sale and in the four quadrants of a circular scale. British Journal of Psychology 43 (1952) 70-77
11. Hoffman, E.R., 1990a. Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes for horizontally moving displays, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 34th Annual Meeting, pp. 457-461.
12. Hoffman, E.R., 1990b. Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes of three-dimensional display/control arrangements. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 34th Annual Meeting, pp. 462-466.
13. Hoffman E.R. Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes-linear displays with rotary controls. Ergonomics 40 2 (1997) 199-222
14. Hoffmann, E., Brown, C., Morgan, S., 1992. Stereotypes for operation of water taps. In: Hoffmann, E., Evans, O. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia Inc., Melbourne, Australia, 2-4 December 1992. Ergonomics Society of Australia Inc., Downer, ACT, Australia, pp. 63-71.
15. Hotta, A., Yoshioka, M., 1988. Experiment on Direction-of-Motion Stereotypes for Indicator or Figure Control. In: Adams, A.S., Hall, R.R., McPhee, B.J., Oxenburgh, M.S., (Eds.), Ergonomics International 88: Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Sydney, Australia, 1-5 August 1988. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 154-156.
16. Kroemer K., Kroemer H., and Kroemer-Elbert K. Ergonomics: How to Design for Ease and Efficiency (1994), Englewood Cliffs,, NJ
17. Loveless N.E. Display-control relationships on circular and linear scales. British Journal of Psychology 47 (1956) 271-282
18. Mital A., and Ramanan S. Accuracy of check-reading dials. In: Eberts R.E., and Eberts C.G. (Eds). Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II (1985), North Holland, Amsterdam
19. Mital A., and Ramanan S. Results of the simulation of a qualitative information display. Human Factors 28 3 (1986) 341-346
20. Petropoulos H., and Brebner J. Stereotypes for direction-of-movement of rotary controls associated with linear displays: the effects of scale presence and position, of pointer direction, and distances between the control and the display. Ergonomics 24 (1981) 143-151
21. Pulat B.M. Fundamentals of industrial ergonomics. In: Selection and Design of Displays and Controls (1992), Englewood Cliffs,, NJ pp. 235-277
22. Ross S., Shepp B.E., and Andrews T.G. Response preferences in display-control relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 39 (1955) 425-428
23. Sanders M.S., and McCormick E.J. Human Factors in Engineering and Design. seventh ed. (1992), McGraw-Hill International Editions
24. Sen R.S., and Das S. An ergonomics study on compatibility of controls of overhead cranes in a heavy engineering factory in West Bengal. Applied Ergonomics 31 (2000) 179-184
25. Warrick, M.J., 1948. Direction of motion stereotypes in positioning a visual indicator by use of a control knob. II. Results from a printed test. USAF AMC Report No. MCREXD-694-19A.
26. Warrick, M.J., 1949. Effects of motion relationships on speed of positioning visual indicators by rotary control knobs. USAF AMC Technical Report No. 581.
27. Warrick, M.J., Grether, W.F., 1948. The effect of pointer alignment on the check reading of engine instrument panels. USAF AMC Memorandum Report No. MCREXD-694-172.
28. Woodson W.E., Tillman B., and Tillman P. Human Factors Design Handbook: Information and Guidelines for the Design of Systems, Facilities, Equipment, and Products for Use. second ed. (1992), McGraw Hill Inc., USA
29. Worringham C.J., and Beringer D.B. Directional stimulus-response compatibility: a test of three alternative principles. Ergonomics 41 6 (1998) 864-880