Naïve and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility: Implications for interface design

Ergonomics

Volumn 46, Issue 1-3, 2003, Pages 169-187

  Vu, Kim Phuong L ^a   Proctor, Robert W ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Display control configurations; Judgments of compatibility; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AIDS; MAPPING; PERFORMANCE;

STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ERGONOMICS; EXPERIMENTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF COMPATIBILITY; SPATIAL MEMORY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; BIOENGINEERING; COLOR VISION; HEARING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; UNITED STATES; VISION;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DATA DISPLAY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; INDIANA; JUDGMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037440235     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130303525     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andre, A. D. and Wickens, C. D. 1990, Display-Control Compatibility in the Cockpit: Guidelines for Display Layout Analysis. Technical Report, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.
2. Duncan, J. 1977, Response selection rules in spatial choice reaction tasks, in S. Dornic (ed.), Attention and Performance VI (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 49-61.
3. Dutta, A. and Proctor, R. W. 1992, Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 801-809.
4. Fitts, P. M. and Deininger, R. L. 1954, S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.
5. Fitts, P. M. and Seeger, C. M. 1953 S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
6. Hommel, B. and Prinz, W. (eds) 1997, Theoretical Issues in Stimulus - Response Compatibility (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
7. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. and Osman, A. 1990, Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy, Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
8. Payne, S. J. 1995, Naïve judgments of stimulus-response compatibility, Human Factors, 37, 495-506.
9. Proctor, R. W. and Reeve, T. G. (eds) 1990, Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
10. Proctor, R. W. and Van Zandt, T. 1994 Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems (Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon).
11. Proctor, R. W. and Vu, K.-P.L. 2002, Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant and irrelevant trials, in W. Prinz and B. Hommel (eds) Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance, Vol. XIX (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 443-473.
12. Shaffer, L. H. 1965, Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 284-288.
13. Umiltà, C. and Nicoletti, R. 1990, Spatial stimulus-response compatibility, in R. W. Proctor and T. G. Reeve (eds), Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective (Amsterdam: North-Holland), 89-116.
14. Vu, K.-P.L. and Proctor, R. W. 2001, Stimulus-response compatibility in interface design, in M. J. Smith, G. Salvendy, D. Harris and R. J. Koubek (eds), Usability Evaluation and Interface Design: Cognitive Engineering, Intelligent Agents, and Virtual Reality, Vol. 1 (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 1368-1372.
15. Vu, K.-P.L. and Proctor, R. W. 2002. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: Elimination, reduction, and enhancement of the spatial compatibility effect. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16. Vu, K.-P.L., Hanley, G. L., Strybel, T. Z. and Proctor, R. W. 2000, Metacognitive processes in human-computer interaction: Self-assessments of knowledge as predictors of computer expertise, International Journal of Human - Computer Interaction, 12, 43-71
17. Wickens, C. D., Gordons, S. E. and Liu, Y. 1997, An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering (New York: Longman).
18. Zhao, B. and Salvendy, G. Psychology of computer use: XXXVIII. Compatibility of task presentation and task structure in human-computer interaction, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 163-175.