Facing up to the challenge: Why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes?

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 17-29

  Green, Wendy ^a   Hammer, Sarah ^b   Star, Cassandra ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Employability; Generic skills; Graduate attributes; Graduate outcomes; Implementation

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149126571     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360802444339     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderson, D., Johnson, R., & Saha, L. (2002). Changes in academic work: Implications for universities of the changing age distribution and work roles of academic staff. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training. Retrieved October 13, 2006, from http:// www.dest.gov.au/archive/ highered/otherpub/academic-work.pdf
2. Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (2002). Employability skills - an employer perspective. Retrieved October 16, 2006, from http://www.acci.asn.au/text-files/ issues-papers/Employ-Educ/ee21.pdf
3. Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee (AVCC). (2003). Excellence and equity: Foundations for the future of Australia's Universities: The AVCC response to the higher education reforms in the 2003 budget. Canberra: Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee.
4. Ballantyne, C., Lowe, K., & Marshall, L. (2004). What employers want: An initiative in testing graduate attributes and informing curriculum. Proceedings of the 2004 Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA). Retrieved 13 October, 2006, from http://www.herdsa.org.au/ conference2004/ Contributions/NRPapers/P052-jt.pdf
5. Barnett, R. (2000). Supercomplexity and the curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 255-265.
6. Barrie, S. (2004). A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(3), 261-275.
7. Barrie, S. (2005). Rethinking generic graduate attributes. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia News, 27(1), 1-6.
8. Barrie, S. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51, 215-241.
9. Barrow, M. (2004). Student assessment and knowing in contemporary Western societies. Proceedings of the 2004 Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA). Retrieved 13 October, 2006, from http://www.herdsa.org.au/conference2004/ Contributions/RPapers/P001-jt.pdf
10. Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: Bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 313-328.
11. B-HERT. (2003, April). Developing generic skills: Examples of best practice. B-HERT News, No. 16, p.1. Retrieved March 1, 2005, from http://www.bhert.com/documents/BHERT-NEWS No.16-001.pdf
12. Bloom, B.S., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.
13. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151-167.
14. Bryant, M., Scoufis, M., & Cheers, M. (1999). The transformation of higher education in Australia: University teaching is at a crossroad. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA). Retrieved 17 October, 2006, from http://www.herdsa.org.au/vic/cornerstones/ pdf/Bryant.PDF
15. Business Council of Australia. (2006). New concepts in innovation: The keys to a growing Australia. Melbourne: Author.
16. Butler, T., & Rubenstein, E. (2004). Aristotle on Nous of Simples. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 34(3), 327-353.
17. Candy, J. (2000). Knowledge navigators and lifelong learners: Producing graduates for the information society. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(3), 261-277.
18. Cannon, M. (2000). Evaluating learning or evaluating teaching: Is there a difference and does it matter? In E. Santhanam (Ed.), Student feedback on teaching: Reflections and projections. Refereed proceedings of teaching evaluation forum (pp. 81-92). Perth: University of Western Australia.
19. Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching. (2006). Carrick awards for university teaching: Guidelines and nomination instructions. Department of Education, Science and Training. Retrieved 17 October, 2006, from http://www.carrickinstitute.edu.au/carrick/webdav/site/ carricksite/users/ siteadmin/public/CAAUT%20Guidelines24Mar.doc
20. Cartwright, P., & Noone L. (2000). Is this what we're supposed to be learning in this unit? Insights from TULIP (Tertiary undergraduate literacy integration program). In K. Chanock (Ed.), Sources of confusion: Refereed proceedings of the National Language and Academic Skills Conference held at Latrobe University (pp. 45-60). Bundoora Vic: La Trobe University, Language and Academic Skills Unit. Retrieved 13 October, 2006, from http://www.latrobe. edu.au/lasu/conference/cartwrighta.doc
21. Chanock, K. (2004). Challenges of the graduate attributes movement. In K. Dellar-Evans & P. Zeegers (Eds.), Language and academic skills development in higher education. Retrieved 13 October, 2006, from http://www.flinders.edu.au/SLC/Chanock2.pdf
22. Chanock, K., Clerehan, R., Moore, T., & Prince, A. (2004). Shaping university teaching towards measurement for accountability: Problems of the Graduate Skills Assessment test. Australian Universities Review, 47(1), 22-29.
23. Christensen, S., & Cuffe, N. (2002), Embedding graduate attributes in law: Why, how and is it working? In K. Appleton, C. Macpherson, & D. Orr (Eds.), Refereed papers from the 2nd International Lifelong Learning Conference (pp. 108-118). Rockhampton: Central Queensland University Press.
24. Clanchy, J., & Ballard, B. (1995). Generic skills in the context of higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 14(2), 155-166.
25. Davies, W.M. (2006). An 'infusion' approach to critical thinking: Moore on the critical thinking debate. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(2), 179-193.
26. De la Harpe, B., Radloff, A., & Wyber, J. (2000). Quality and generic (professional) skills. Quality in Higher Education, 6(3), 231-243.
27. Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). (2005). Our universities: Backing Australia's future. Retrieved 16 October, 2006, from http://www.backingasutraliasfuture. gov.au/publications/striving-for-quality/5. htm
28. Devlin, M. (2002). An improved questionnaire for gathering student perceptions of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(3), 289-304.
29. Ennis, R. (1997). Incorporating critical thinking in the curriculum: An introduction to some basic issues. Inquiry, 16(3), 1-9.
30. Hager, P., Holland, S., & Beckett, D. (2002). Enhancing the learning and employability of graduates: The role of generic skills. Business/ Higher Education Round Table Position Paper No 9. Melbourne, Australia.
31. Jackson, M. (2006). Great classroom teaching and more: Awards for outstanding teaching evaluated. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(4/5) 261-278.
32. James, B., Lefoe, G., & Hadi, M. (2004). Working 'through' graduate attributes: A bottom-up approach. In F. Sheehy & B. Stauble (Eds.), Transforming knowledge into wisdom: Holistic approaches to teaching and learning, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia HERDSA Conference, Miri, Sarawak, (pp. 174-184). Milperra, NSW: Author.
33. Karns, G. (2005). An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(2), 163-171.
34. Kift, S. (2002). Harnessing assessment and feedback to assure quality outcomes for graduate capability development: A legal education case study. Curriculum review for generic competency: the Faculty of Law. Retrieved 9 June, 2006, from http://www.aare.edu.au/ 02pap/kift02151.htm
35. Kift, S. (2003). Assuring quality in the casualisation of teaching, learning and assessment: Towards best practice for the First Year Experience. 6th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference: Changing Agendas - Te Ao Hurihuri, Christchurch NZ, University of Canterbury. Retrieved October 13, 2006, from http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/ march03/kift1.htm
36. Kimber, M. (2003). The tenured 'core' and the tenuous 'periphery': The casualisation of academic work in Australian universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(1), 41-50.
37. Kirkpatrick, A., & Mulligan, D. (2002). Cultures of learning: Critical reading in the social and applied sciences. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 73-99.
38. Luca, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Developing an instructional design strategy to support generic skills development. In A. Williamson, C. Gunn, A. Young, & T. Clear (Eds.), Winds of change in a sea of learning: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) (pp. 401-411). Auckland: UNITEC Institute of Technology.
39. McGrail, M.R., Rickard, C.M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 19-35.
40. Moore, T. (2004). The critical thinking debate: How general are general thinking skills? Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 3-18.
41. Parry, S., & Debowski, S. (2004, December). The evaluative state. HERDSA News, pp. 12- 13.
42. Phillips, V., & Bond, C. (2004). Undergraduates' experiences of critical thinking. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 277-294.
43. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1998). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Milton Keynes: Open University.
44. Reid, I., & Parker, L. (2002). Framing institutional policies on literacies. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 19-27.
45. Roberts, G., & Mentowski, M. (2004). Abilities that distinguish the effectiveness of five-year alumna performance across work, family and civic roles: A higher education validation. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 347-374.
46. San Miguel, C. (1996). Cultural influences on academic literacy: A case study. Open Letter, 6(2), 31-43.
47. Schapper, J.M., & Mayson, S.E. (2004). Internationalisation of curricula: An alternative to the Taylorisation of academic work. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(2), 189-205.
48. Scoufis, M. (2000). Graduate attributes projects: A focus for grass roots change in teaching and learning practices. Retrieved 13 October, 2006, from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/ 24986/20020705/cea.curtin.edu.au/tlf/ tlf2000/scoufis.html
49. Smith, L., & Riley, D. (2003, September/October). Mode 1 and Mode 2 knowledge: Implications for Australian education. Thinking about tomorrow. National Conference, Darling Harbour, Sydney. Retrieved 2 November 2006, from http://www.aspa.asn.au/Confs/ Aspa2003/smith%20&%20riley.rtf
50. Sumsion, J., & Goodfellow, J. (2004). Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: A critical evaluation. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 329-346.