Resources and pollinators contribute to population sex-ratio bias and pollen limitation in Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae)

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1250-1260

  Case, Andrea L ^a,b   Ashman, Tia Lynn ^a,b  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; FLOWER VISITING; FREQUENCY DEPENDENCE; GYNODIOECY; HERMAPHRODITE; POLLEN LIMITATION; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; SEED PRODUCTION; SEX RATIO;

FRAGARIA VIRGINIANA; FRAGARIA X ANANASSA; ROSACEAE;

EID: 68149107561     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17520.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ashman, T-L. 1999. Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism J. Evol. Biol. 12 : 648 661.
2. Ashman, T-L. 2000. Pollinator selectivity and its implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism Ecology 81 : 2577 2591.
3. Ashman, T-L. 2006. The evolution of separate sexes: a focus on the ecological context Barrett, S. C. H. Harder, L. D. The ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford Univ. Press 419 465.
4. Ashman, T-L. Stanton, M. L. 1991. Seasonal variation in pollination dynamics of sexually dimorphic Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata (Malvaceae) Ecology 72 : 993 1003.
5. Ashman, T-L. Hitchens, M. S. 2000. Dissecting the causes of variation in intra-inflorescence allocation in a sexually polymorphic species, Fragaria virginiana Am. J. Bot. 87 : 197 204.
6. Ashman, T-L. Diefenderfer, C. 2001. Sex ratio represents a unique context for selection on attractive traits: consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism Am. Nat. 157 : 334 347.
7. Ashman, T-L. King, E. A. 2005. Are flower-visiting ants mutualists or antagonists? A study in a gynodioecious wild strawberry Am. J. Bot. 92 : 891 895.
8. Ashman, T-L. et al. 2000. Understanding the basis of pollinator selectivity in sexually dimorphic Fragaria virginiana Oikos 90 : 347 356.
9. Ashman, T-L. et al. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences Ecology 85 : 2408 2421.
10. Ashman, T-L. et al. 2005. The scent of a male: the role of floral volatiles in pollination of a gender dimorphic plant Ecology 86 : 2099 2105.
11. Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 224 : 223 265.
12. Busch, J. W. Schoen, D. J. 2008. The evolution of self-incompatibility when mates are limiting Trends Plant Sci. 13 : 128 136.
13. Case, A. L. Barrett, S. C. H. 2004. Floral biology of gender monomorphism and dimorphism in Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae) in Western Australia Int. J. Plant Sci. 165 : 289 301.
14. Case, A. L. Ashman, T-L. 2007. An experimental test of the effects of resources and sex ratio on maternal fitness and phenotypic selection in gynodioecious Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae) Evolution 61 : 1900 1911.
15. Cuevas, E. et al. 2008. Variation in sex ratio, morph-specific reproductive ecology and an experimental test of frequency-dependence in the gyodioecious Kallstroemia grandiflora (Zygophyllaceae) J. Evol. Biol. 21 : 1117 1124.
16. Delph, L. F. 1990. Sex-ratio variation in the gynodioecious shrub Hebe strictissima (Scrophulariaceae) Evolution 44 : 134 142.
17. Delph, L. F. Lively, C. M. 1992. Pollinator visitation, floral display, and nectar production of the sexual morphs of a gynodioecious shrub Oikos 63 : 161 170.
18. Delph, L. F. et al. 1996. Sexual dimorphism in flower size Am. Nat. 148 : 299 320.
19. Eckhart, V. M. 1991. The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae) Evol. Ecol. 5 : 370 384.
20. Eckhart, V. M. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences Geber, M. A. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer 123 148.
21. Eckhart, V. M. et al. 2006. Frequency-dependent pollinator foraging in polymorphic Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana populations: implications for flower colour evolution and pollinator interactions Oikos 112 : 412 421.
22. Ganders, F. R. 1978. The genetics and evolution of gynodioecy in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae) Can. J. Bot. 56 : 400 408.
23. Geber, M. A. et al. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer.
24. Kesseli, R. Jain, S. K. 1984. An ecological genetic study of gyndioecy in Limnanthes douglasii (Limnanthaceae) Am. J. Bot. 71 : 775 786.
25. Knight, T. M. et al. 2005. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36 : 467 497.
26. Knight, T. M. et al. 2006. A quantitative synthesis of pollen supplementation experiments highlights the contribution of resource reallocation to estimates of pollen limitation Am. J. Bot. 92 : 270 276.
27. Kohn, J. R. Biardi, J. E. 1995. Outcrossing rates and inferred levels of inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Cucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae) Heredity 75 : 77 83.
28. Lewis, D. 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants New Phytol. 40 : 56 63.
29. Lloyd, D. G. 1974. Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms Heredity 31 : 11 34.
30. Maurice, S. Fleming, T. H. 1995. The effect of pollen limitation on plant reproductive systems and the maintenance of sexual polymorphisms Oikos 74 : 55 60. (Pubitemid 3005223)
31. McCauley, D. E. Brock, M. T. 1998. Frequency-dependent fitness in Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant Evolution 52 : 30 36.
32. Potvin, C. 2001. ANOVA: experimental layout and analysis Scheiner, S. M. Gurevitch, J. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford Press 63 76.
33. Ramula, S. et al. 2007. Demographic consequences of pollen limitation and inbreeding depression in a gynodioecious herb Int. J. Plant Sci. 168 : 443 453.
34. Robertson, A. W. et al. 1999. Bumble bee selection of Mimulus guttatus flowers: the effects of pollen quality and reward depletion Ecology 80 : 2594 2606.
35. Shykoff, J. A. et al. 2003. Effects of male sterility on reproductive traits in gynodioecious plants: a meta-analysis Oecologia 135 : 1 9.
36. Sokal, R. R. Rolff, F. J. 1995. Biometry, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co.
37. Spigler, K. S. et al. 2008. Genetic mapping of sex determination in a wild strawberry, Fragaria virginiana reveals earliest form of sex chromosome Heredity 101 : 507 517.
38. Staudt, G. 1989. The species of Fragaria, their taxonomic and geographical distribution Acta Hort. 265 : 23 33.
39. Stehlik, I. et al. 2006. Spatial ecology of mating success in a sexually polymorphic plant Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273 : 387 394.
40. Vaughton, G. Ramsey, M. 1998. Floral display, pollinator visitation and reproductive success in the dioecious perennial herb Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae) Oecologia 115 : 93 101.
41. Vaughton, G. Ramsey, M. 2004. Dry environments promote the establishment of females in monomorphic populations of Wurmbea biglanulosa (Colchicaceae) Evol. Ecol. 18 : 323 341.
42. Weller, S. G. Sakai, A. K. 2005. Selfing and resource allocation in Schiedea salicaria (Caryophyllaceae), a gynodioecious species J. Evol. Biol. 18 : 301 308.
43. Weller, S. G. et al. 1990. Evolution of dioecy in Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae: Alsinoideae) in the Hawaiian Islands (USA): biogeographical and ecological factors Syst. Bot. 15 : 266 276.
44. Wolfe, L. M. Shmida, A. 1997. The ecology of sex expression in a gynodioecious Israeli desert shrub (Ochradenus baccatus) Ecology 78 : 101 110.